Subaru TA340C: the hot Scooby lives!


Embarrassing to admit it, but I can remember where I was when the Subaru Impreza Turbo entered my life. I was sitting in my Peugeot 205 XS in my lunch break, reading Autocar.
The cover read: "Subaru Impreza Turbo, 208bhp, 0-60 in 5.8sec, £17,499."

Scooby + B-road = business as usual...
Scooby + B-road = business as usual...
It felt like a significant moment. Just looking at the bare numbers, rationalising the speed against the all-wheel drive, the relative value, the compact dimensions and the reputation for reliability. Little did any of us know that the dumpy little Subaru would launch the career of the most famous rally driver in history and define performance motoring for an entire generation.

The party is over...
But like any Empire that burgeoned with breathtaking speed, the demise of the Subaru as the heartland of affordable performance has been brisk and, at times, made uncomfortable viewing. It has been a story of changing consumer demands, increased competition, exchange-rate difficulties and, lest we should forget, a global recession.

Moody grey wrap looks suitably mean
Moody grey wrap looks suitably mean
There are communities still in the grip of Subaru-rapture though. There are many reasons to visit Wales, but one of the strangest has to be Scooby-viewing. It's like The Land That Time Forgot in the valleys, and understandably so. Yes, these people are die-hard rally fans, but alter your frame of reference for someone living where precipitation and modification are key influencers and you can see why Subarus and Mitsubishis still parp and hiss their way at great speed in all conditions. They are just unbeatable on those roads.

I was driving through Wales before Christmas and it suddenly struck me that with sales of new Impreza STIs being so slow and Mitsubishi abandoning the sector to build air-conditioning units, what are these lads going to drive in 10 years time? Who is maintaining the culture of fast Subarus in the UK? Who is nurturing it for future generations? What did John Major say about stuff 'cascading through generations'? OK, I'll stop - but you get the point.

Factory 'big wing' and Prodrive 19s bulk up looks
Factory 'big wing' and Prodrive 19s bulk up looks
...or is it?
Well, there is a shining beacon of boxer-enthusiam, but sadly for residents of The Principality, it is in Warwickshire.

Cross Roads Subaru is, at face value, a normal Subaru dealership whose name has been slightly undermined by the insertion of a roundabout bang outside the front door. But anyone who drives past this forecourt cannot fail to notice the unmistakable signs of rampant car-enthusiasm. An American police car, a mint RS500 Cosworth and a bevy of various-vintaged Imprezas crowd the forecourt.

Jon Mathers and his team don't just live and breathe Subarus, they appear to subsist on any kind of performance car. Lurking in among the new Subaru models in the showroom is an X-Pack bodied Mk2 Escort with Honda VTEC power and a beautifully adapted rear-axle assembly. Just one look at the quality of preparation on this track-day toy and you know these are people who do things the right way.

TA340C in its element...
TA340C in its element...
Keeping it real
To avoid this reading like an advertorial, I won't list the awards that Jon and his team have won over the years, suffice to say they are to Impreza sales what Don Bradman was to the five-day test match. They sell more than any other dealer in the UK.

This makes them culturally important for the survival of genus Scooby, but it is their work supporting the wider community of fettlers, Time-Attackers and also spicing-up the current range of cars that really endorses their role in the support of a great Japanese-British tradition. To prove as much, we are going to drive a limited edition Impreza called a TA 340C, which they have developed. TA denotes Time Attack, the championship Jon won last year in his loopy 600hp race car.

Pro-R branded Alcon brakes part of the package
Pro-R branded Alcon brakes part of the package
Local home brew
Testing modified Subarus is a sketchy business. It's easy to allow dyno printouts and sundry bullshit to cloud your feelings about how the car actually drives on the road. Added thump normally means compromised power delivery and suspension mods remove the chassis' chances of smothering bumps. The 340C couldn't be more different. After the standard 320 it feels much more responsive below 3,000rpm, then pulls harder all the way to the limiter. This is apparently all down to a re-map and less back pressure in the revised exhaust system, complete with a Scorpion back box. If such mild changes elicit such advantages, you can only assume the car is horribly strangled in standard form.

The chassis is a peach too. Supple, absorbing and agile: it reminded me that, despite your RS4s and 911 Turbos, there will always be something about these cars on damp, scummy UK roads. It feels more direct than the standard car. It's been re-bushed (Superpro), but as is often the case, new Eibach springs and roll bars have slightly tightened everything up but not at the expense of compliance or comfort. They may not have the firepower, but what these cars have - have always had - is that ability to screw themselves into the surface with unrivalled efficiency. And, of course, they just want to be driven fast. To me, this car felt like a very potent version of the original RB5. Those who know it will understand that's a compliment.

Shades of the RB5 live on in the TA340C
Shades of the RB5 live on in the TA340C
Where progress has been unkind to the Impreza is in the finer details. The plastics are hard, the cabin styling is bland - you know the score by now - as showroom eye-candy this struggles against anything German.

But as a car that feels good moving slow and fast, one that will clip you along regardless of weather conditions, the £39,995 340C remains compelling for the committed few. Hopefully enough will be sold so that in five years time, young lads in the Valleys can buy them and drive them at unfeasible speed following Wales Rally GB.


SUBARU WRX STI TA340C
Engine:
2,457cc flat-four turbo
Power (hp): 340@5,400rpm
Torque (lb ft): 376@3,600rpm
0-62mph: c. 4.7 sec
Top speed: 158mph
Weight: 1,505kg
MPG: 26.9mpg (NEDC combined, standard WRX STI)
CO2: 243g/km (standard WRX STI)
Price: £39,995

 





 

P.H. O'meter

Join the PH rating wars with your marks out of 10 for the article (Your ratings will be shown in your profile if you have one!)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rate this article

Comments (143) Join the discussion on the forum

  • ThePlanner 07 Feb 2012

    Ali_T said:
    LukeyLikey said:
    EVO X superior in every way?! The STI has a brilliantly engineered flat four engine with massive character, the EVO has an in-line four, like, well pretty much everything else, sounds average, little or no character. Never liked the looks of the EVO and while the Impreza has never been an oil painting it looks meaner and more purposeful (subjective, I know, but that works both ways). The STI four wheel drive system is better, Subaru call it Symmetrical and when you look into the details it is better (why shouldn't it be, they pioneered all wheel drive on saloon cars 40 years ago before even Audi got there). The point of symmetrical all wheel drive is that the weight and drive is split evenly side to side so the handling is more even and consistent. The low CoG from the boxer engine helps with that too. Group N results mentioned above would seem to back this up.

    I know this is an age old argument and you can clearly see where I stand but EVO X is certainly not superior in every way, in fact it could well be the reverse. I for one could not think of spending £30k+ on an in-line four cylinder Mitsubishi.
    I've owned both. Have you? The Evo X FQ330 is better in every way than the STI 330S. Handling, ride, build quality, transmission smoothness (ever lifted off and then quickly reapplied the throttle on a 330S over 100mph....you won't do twice in a hurry, drivetrain shunt is shocking), engine smoothness, turbo lag (the Subaru makes a characterful noise, but suffers large dollops of '70s style lag)....you get the picture. I even went out of my way and spent money on the Prodrive springs for the 330S to try and improve the floaty, rep mobile, handling but it would take a complete bush kit to get it anywhere close to a standard Evo X, never mind a modified one. The chronic understeer in sharp corners was also rep mobile-like and no amount of symmetrical AWD could prevent it ploughing straight on in the wet. There was a lot I did like about it but, even disregarding the engine issue, I wouldn't buy another one, not now I've seen how much better the opposition is.

    As for that brilliantly engineered engine? I don't regard any engine that lunches a piston and block inside 20,000 miles as brilliant. Feel free to do more homework and see how bad the situation is worldwide. It's a joke.
    Are you sure you haved owned them? The my one I would give to the Evo is handling. Evo build quality is st. The FQ I looked a buying were shockingly bad. Interior on the impreza has moved on. Turbo lag hmm yes they ave lag but not as you suggest, you sure you were not lulling off in 3rd gear.

    Rep mobile handling, the 330s I went out in was planted on the b-roads, not as precise as the Evo, but more compliant and inspired trust in the car. It was more forgiving than the Evo. It sound like you have been out in the entry WRX and not the 330s

  • LukeyLikey 07 Feb 2012

    paulmoonraker said:
    Ali_T said:
    I've owned both. Have you? The Evo X FQ330 is better in every way than the STI 330S. Handling, ride, build quality, transmission smoothness (ever lifted off and then quickly reapplied the throttle on a 330S over 100mph....you won't do twice in a hurry, drivetrain shunt is shocking), engine smoothness, turbo lag (the Subaru makes a characterful noise, but suffers large dollops of '70s style lag)....you get the picture. I even went out of my way and spent money on the Prodrive springs for the 330S to try and improve the floaty, rep mobile, handling but it would take a complete bush kit to get it anywhere close to a standard Evo X, never mind a modified one. The chronic understeer in sharp corners was also rep mobile-like and no amount of symmetrical AWD could prevent it ploughing straight on in the wet. There was a lot I did like about it but, even disregarding the engine issue, I wouldn't buy another one, not now I've seen how much better the opposition is.

    As for that brilliantly engineered engine? I don't regard any engine that lunches a piston and block inside 20,000 miles as brilliant. Feel free to do more homework and see how bad the situation is worldwide. It's a joke.
    You have a sour taste because of your nightmare with Subaru wink However, for what it's worth, I would not trust the newer 2.5 lump - period.
    What doing the homework will tell you is that many of these cars are modified beyond what the manufacturer designed them for, but without the job being done properly. I have had a string of 2.5 turbos none of them ever missed a beat but then I rarely put them on tracks and bounce off the limiter. If you go above about 330 bhp you need to change more internals. That never used to be the case with older Imprezas but the newer cars have different pistons, might be something to do with emissions (not previously a Subaru strongpoint, only a little better now).

    I have a Cosworth. 400 bhp but with a very detailed list of upgrades. I've done 12k miles at warp speed with not any issues. My experience in numerous STI 2.5's without any problems at all cannot be luck. When you read what people do to upgrade their STI's, it does seem at least plausible that they are contributing to their problems (don't want to presume about others' experiences, can only be sure about my own)? That's of course their choice, but it doesn't seem to be right to blame the manufacturer if an owner chooses to change the product.

    I'm not sure about your STI but I just don't recognise your ownership/driving experience from mine. I have never owned an EVO but driven a number over enough miles to compare (all later cars though). Build is not better, ride is not better (all IMHO), STI's do have an underlying trait of under steer compared with EVO's but overall it does not seem reasonable to dismiss the Subaru. I can see you won't be persuaded for your own reasons but I frankly, feel exactly the same.

    Although STi's are often tracked, they are really road/rally cars, where under steer does not compromise the driving experience, especially with the diff and DCCD which eradicates the under steer mechanically (not very purist but the appeal of this genre is not like an M3).

    I'll shut up now but overall I've had enough experience with Subaru and other brands (Jag, BMW, Porsche, Audi, Mercedes, Aston, Ferrari, etc.) to know that my good experience with Subarus over the years is not luck.

  • paulmoonraker 07 Feb 2012

    Ali_T said:
    I've owned both. Have you? The Evo X FQ330 is better in every way than the STI 330S. Handling, ride, build quality, transmission smoothness (ever lifted off and then quickly reapplied the throttle on a 330S over 100mph....you won't do twice in a hurry, drivetrain shunt is shocking), engine smoothness, turbo lag (the Subaru makes a characterful noise, but suffers large dollops of '70s style lag)....you get the picture. I even went out of my way and spent money on the Prodrive springs for the 330S to try and improve the floaty, rep mobile, handling but it would take a complete bush kit to get it anywhere close to a standard Evo X, never mind a modified one. The chronic understeer in sharp corners was also rep mobile-like and no amount of symmetrical AWD could prevent it ploughing straight on in the wet. There was a lot I did like about it but, even disregarding the engine issue, I wouldn't buy another one, not now I've seen how much better the opposition is.

    As for that brilliantly engineered engine? I don't regard any engine that lunches a piston and block inside 20,000 miles as brilliant. Feel free to do more homework and see how bad the situation is worldwide. It's a joke.
    You have a sour taste because of your nightmare with Subaru wink However, for what it's worth, I would not trust the newer 2.5 lump - period.

  • paulmoonraker 07 Feb 2012

    Legacywr said:
    The STI is a nicer everyday car than the Evo X.
    This does seem the general consensus... To me, the Evo is more focused, but this comes with compromise...

  • Ali_T 07 Feb 2012

    LukeyLikey said:
    EVO X superior in every way?! The STI has a brilliantly engineered flat four engine with massive character, the EVO has an in-line four, like, well pretty much everything else, sounds average, little or no character. Never liked the looks of the EVO and while the Impreza has never been an oil painting it looks meaner and more purposeful (subjective, I know, but that works both ways). The STI four wheel drive system is better, Subaru call it Symmetrical and when you look into the details it is better (why shouldn't it be, they pioneered all wheel drive on saloon cars 40 years ago before even Audi got there). The point of symmetrical all wheel drive is that the weight and drive is split evenly side to side so the handling is more even and consistent. The low CoG from the boxer engine helps with that too. Group N results mentioned above would seem to back this up.

    I know this is an age old argument and you can clearly see where I stand but EVO X is certainly not superior in every way, in fact it could well be the reverse. I for one could not think of spending £30k+ on an in-line four cylinder Mitsubishi.
    I've owned both. Have you? The Evo X FQ330 is better in every way than the STI 330S. Handling, ride, build quality, transmission smoothness (ever lifted off and then quickly reapplied the throttle on a 330S over 100mph....you won't do twice in a hurry, drivetrain shunt is shocking), engine smoothness, turbo lag (the Subaru makes a characterful noise, but suffers large dollops of '70s style lag)....you get the picture. I even went out of my way and spent money on the Prodrive springs for the 330S to try and improve the floaty, rep mobile, handling but it would take a complete bush kit to get it anywhere close to a standard Evo X, never mind a modified one. The chronic understeer in sharp corners was also rep mobile-like and no amount of symmetrical AWD could prevent it ploughing straight on in the wet. There was a lot I did like about it but, even disregarding the engine issue, I wouldn't buy another one, not now I've seen how much better the opposition is.

    As for that brilliantly engineered engine? I don't regard any engine that lunches a piston and block inside 20,000 miles as brilliant. Feel free to do more homework and see how bad the situation is worldwide. It's a joke.

View all comments in the forums Make a comment