Is car finance the way to go now?

Is car finance the way to go now?

Author
Discussion

Sheepshanks

32,922 posts

120 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
It's two things.

1) The balloon payment.
Careful here - "Balloon" is a lease purchase thing - it's a term that's crept in as people merge types of finance together without understanding subtle differences.

With lease purchase you have to repay the balloon - it's not optional like it is with a PCP. Of course you can p/x the car and start a new agreement but if it's worth less you have to make up the difference.

Dr Jekyll said:
2) The minimum amount the vehicle will be valued at when the agreement finishes.
Strictly, that's wrong too. The GFV might be £15K but the car could be valued at £12K. This is an issue if you really wanted to keep the car - you'd have to pay £15K for a car only worth £12K.

For this reason GFV is tending to be dropped as a term now and you'll increasingly see it called Optional Final Payment.

SarGara

365 posts

177 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
Nickbrapp said:
So true, fked over by the baby boomers with their final salary pensions, cheap houses and buy to let portfolios. I earn more than the average uk employee, and even if can ever save the money for a deposit, I can't get a big enough mortgage because all the flats I want to buy have been bought by baby boomers and their bloody portfolios. To buy a 2 bed flat in Cardiff where I want to live it's £180k. To get a deposit on a mortgage like that I would have to save 40k, so forgive me for wanting to have a nice car in the mean time.

Generation buy will come to a end until the baby boomers come to retire and die and suddenly their bloody portfolios flood the market.

Don't even get me started on pensions, sure there are still good schemes out there, my partner gets 12% for every 6% he puts in, but I'm stuck with a poxy 1% contribution. Fantastic. Can't wait to be retired and have that dazzling £300 a year to spend! It's just not worth it. Be easier to just kill myself when I turn 70, if that's even when I can retire.

Why save for tomorrow and for go all the good things now while I have my health and good looks?

Maybe the solution is to buy in a awful area, but why should I? for now if I don't want to live at home I'm stuck renting paying off a fking baby boomers 2nd pension, so they can Swan about banging on about how my generation are the worst, shouldn't be buying shiny white audis and should be buying houses instead.

Does my head in.

Edited by Nickbrapp on Sunday 4th September 22:47
Underrated post right here, well said Nick.

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

213 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
kmpowell said:
TazLondon said:
leasing a car (HP or PCP)
Without wishing to sound pedantic, neither of those are leasing.

Purchasing
HP - Hire Purchase
PCP - Personal Contract Purchase
LP - Lease Purchase.

Leasing
PCL - Personal Contract Lease
PCH - Personal Contract Hire
PCP is a lease.

Granfondo

12,241 posts

207 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
TazLondon said:
There's one thing that confuses me about finance and that is the GFV.

Is this known as the balloon payment that you pay at the end of the term to keep the car?

I also see stuff about using the car to fund the deposit on a new car after the term. How does this work? Just as an example, if the balloon payment was £15K, then how would that fund a deposit on a new car?

I'm just doing some sums at the moment to see if it's better to go down the finance route as I almost always change cars at 3 years old at the very latest.
It's two things.

1) The balloon payment.
2) The minimum amount the vehicle will be valued at when the agreement finishes.

So the worst case is you can hand the car back as the balloon and walk away. But with luck the actual value will be higher so the difference can be used towards a deposit on a new car. The GFV may be deliberately set at a level intended to leave a deposit because that makes it easier to encourage you to get a fresh car. On the other hand it may be set at a high level leaving no equity to keep the monthly payments down (Mercedes used to be notorious for this).

Also bear in mind you are paying interest on the entire GFV all the way through the deal so the lower the GFV the cheaper in the long run. If you really don't need the option of keeping the car after the agreement it's probably cheaper to lease.
And also check the interest rate on the optional final payment "balloon" which can be far higher than the headline "hook" rate!

silentbrown

8,881 posts

117 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
Granfondo said:
And also check the interest rate on the optional final payment "balloon" which can be far higher than the headline "hook" rate!
Really? I'd be amazed. Do you have any example of that?

Butter Face

30,419 posts

161 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
silentbrown said:
Granfondo said:
And also check the interest rate on the optional final payment "balloon" which can be far higher than the headline "hook" rate!
Really? I'd be amazed. Do you have any example of that?
I'd also be amazed. Because it's not going to happen.

Lots of misinformation about this type of stuff!

kmpowell

2,943 posts

229 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
kmpowell said:
TazLondon said:
leasing a car (HP or PCP)
Without wishing to sound pedantic, neither of those are leasing.

Purchasing
HP - Hire Purchase
PCP - Personal Contract Purchase
LP - Lease Purchase.

Leasing
PCL - Personal Contract Lease
PCH - Personal Contract Hire
PCP is a lease.
No it's not. The clue is in the name. rolleyes

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

213 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
kmpowell said:
No it's not. The clue is in the name. rolleyes
Don't judge a book by its cover.

Unless of course you're also a qualified accountant that has spent the last 15 years advising on lease accounting.

kmpowell

2,943 posts

229 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
kmpowell said:
No it's not. The clue is in the name. rolleyes
Don't judge a book by its cover.

Unless of course you're also a qualified accountant that has spent the last 15 years advising on lease accounting.
I'm just somebody who's been using LP/PCP for the past 16years, working in the FS sector for 8 of those years. At any point in a PCP you can walk away and 'settle', pocketing any £difference, in a PCH/PCL you can't. You have no stake equity in a lease, becsuse you are hiring, not purchasing.

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

213 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
kmpowell said:
At any point in a PCP you can walk away and 'settle', pocketing any £difference, in a PCH/PCL you can't.
This is what makes it a lease and not a purchase,

silentbrown

8,881 posts

117 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
kmpowell said:
No it's not. The clue is in the name. rolleyes
Don't judge a book by its cover.

Unless of course you're also a qualified accountant that has spent the last 15 years advising on lease accounting.
OK... So what's the distinction between lease/non-lease?

I'd assumed it was something to do with intent to own, and if the entire value of the 'asset' appears on the balance sheet?

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

213 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
silentbrown said:
OK... So what's the distinction between lease/non-lease?

I'd assumed it was something to do with intent to own, and if the entire value of the 'asset' appears on the balance sheet?
Depends on which accounting standard you're reporting under.

New IFRS (IFRS 16) Finance and Operating Leases both on BS (boo hoo)
Old IFRS (IAS 17), UK (SSAP21) and US (FAS13) Finance Leases on BS, Operating Leases not (Slight definition difference US/IFRS v UK)

Difference mainly driven by how long you use the asset as % of its life, % value of residual value v original price and who carries residual value risk. Each contract would need to be assessed regardless of the name of the product (substance over form).

Usually with a car Contract Purchase arrangement it will last three or four years (of a lifetime of say ten years), the residual value is still a sizeable element (say ~30%) and because the Lessee has the option (BUT NOT THE OBLIGATION) to purchase the asset residual value risk stays with the Lessor, this means CP is an Operating Lease and will need to be accounted for as above.


eta
To answer your question, the difference is basically if you're committed to pay for the full amount and if you suffer the negative impact in a change in the second hand market value, which is why some leases are treated as purchases (Finance Leases).

Edited by CaptainSlow on Monday 5th September 17:33

Granfondo

12,241 posts

207 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
So are PCP'ers "renters" after all? biggrin

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 6th September 2016
quotequote all
SarGara said:
Nickbrapp said:
So true, fked over by the baby boomers with their final salary pensions, cheap houses and buy to let portfolios. I earn more than the average uk employee, and even if can ever save the money for a deposit, I can't get a big enough mortgage because all the flats I want to buy have been bought by baby boomers and their bloody portfolios. To buy a 2 bed flat in Cardiff where I want to live it's £180k. To get a deposit on a mortgage like that I would have to save 40k, so forgive me for wanting to have a nice car in the mean time.

Generation buy will come to a end until the baby boomers come to retire and die and suddenly their bloody portfolios flood the market.

Don't even get me started on pensions, sure there are still good schemes out there, my partner gets 12% for every 6% he puts in, but I'm stuck with a poxy 1% contribution. Fantastic. Can't wait to be retired and have that dazzling £300 a year to spend! It's just not worth it. Be easier to just kill myself when I turn 70, if that's even when I can retire.

Why save for tomorrow and for go all the good things now while I have my health and good looks?

Maybe the solution is to buy in a awful area, but why should I? for now if I don't want to live at home I'm stuck renting paying off a fking baby boomers 2nd pension, so they can Swan about banging on about how my generation are the worst, shouldn't be buying shiny white audis and should be buying houses instead.

Does my head in.

Edited by Nickbrapp on Sunday 4th September 22:47
Underrated post right here, well said Nick.
I agree, well said.

We are the 'entitled' generation when the baby boomers are the ones who destroyed the market and left us having to scrimp and save to afford a house or two!

C70R

17,596 posts

105 months

Sunday 11th September 2016
quotequote all
SarGara said:
Nickbrapp said:
So true, fked over by the baby boomers with their final salary pensions, cheap houses and buy to let portfolios. I earn more than the average uk employee, and even if can ever save the money for a deposit, I can't get a big enough mortgage because all the flats I want to buy have been bought by baby boomers and their bloody portfolios. To buy a 2 bed flat in Cardiff where I want to live it's £180k. To get a deposit on a mortgage like that I would have to save 40k, so forgive me for wanting to have a nice car in the mean time.

Generation buy will come to a end until the baby boomers come to retire and die and suddenly their bloody portfolios flood the market.

Don't even get me started on pensions, sure there are still good schemes out there, my partner gets 12% for every 6% he puts in, but I'm stuck with a poxy 1% contribution. Fantastic. Can't wait to be retired and have that dazzling £300 a year to spend! It's just not worth it. Be easier to just kill myself when I turn 70, if that's even when I can retire.

Why save for tomorrow and for go all the good things now while I have my health and good looks?

Maybe the solution is to buy in a awful area, but why should I? for now if I don't want to live at home I'm stuck renting paying off a fking baby boomers 2nd pension, so they can Swan about banging on about how my generation are the worst, shouldn't be buying shiny white audis and should be buying houses instead.

Does my head in.

Edited by Nickbrapp on Sunday 4th September 22:47
Underrated post right here, well said Nick.
I don't know about underrated - it sounds a bit entitled, if you ask me. Life has always, irrespective of generation, been a case of living within means. It's a simple fact of life that if you can't afford something then you can't have it. If you can't afford to live in the area you truly desire, then you're either not earning enough or not saving hard enough. Worrying about the car you own (and spending anything but the essentials on a hobby) at the same time as complaining that you can't afford to get on the property ladder is a bit tough to understand.

Did you ask your parents what they were doing before they bought their house? I bet they weren't renting privately, enjoying expensive hobbies, taking foreign holidays and having an active social life.

You might complain that previous generations had it easier to buy property, and that's absolutely true. But we have numerous advantages that they could only dream of, such as social mobility, world travel and access to technology. It's a case of swings and roundabouts.

RB5_245

72 posts

214 months

Sunday 11th September 2016
quotequote all
PCP is great, as long as you take it for what it is. It's not a great way to own your car.

If you want to regularly have a new car, and don't mind not owning it then it's the way to go. You take a new car, take the expected depreciation over the term you've picked and divide that depreciation into equal payments over that time. Given you're only paying depreciation, you may as well consider your initial payment, and future payments as rental. If you get something back at the end with your car being worth more than the final payment that's just a bonus. Give the car back at the end.

If you want to own the car outright and keep it for years, find a perfect one 1-2 years old. Get a bank loan/HP over the term that makes the payments manageable and avoid paying for the majority of the depreciation. A 1-2 year old main dealer car is as good as new, and a lot better deal financially.

Edited by RB5_245 on Sunday 11th September 12:48

JiggyJaggy

1,451 posts

141 months

Sunday 11th September 2016
quotequote all
Funny that the only reason I bought a BTL on top of my own home (eventually btw - I had to work bloody hard to get to that point) was to treat myself on the car stakes. My thinking was simply, buy a BTL which generates circa £200-£300 pcm which I happily spend towards finance on a fun weekend car. It doesn't pay for the weekend toy but it certainly pays the plus part of the costs. Hopefully the BTL asset will be worth more at retirement age, after the government have finished fleecing me!

WaferThinHam

1,680 posts

131 months

Sunday 11th September 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Why should it bother him?

If I could get the best return on investment with BTL then that's what I'd do.

Wouldn't you? (I assume you'll say no just to claim the moral high ground....)

akirk

5,407 posts

115 months

Sunday 11th September 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Why? - if something needs sorting out (and I agree it does) why do you, or why does anyone have the right to sit there and say that someone else should sort it out? if you believe it needs to be sorted out - get involved and sort it out - what this country needs more than anything else is decent politicians - we have some, we need a higher % what we do not need is people sitting there saying that someone else should do it...

anonymous said:
[redacted]
Do you actually know anything about economics? You can pay sub $100 per acre in parts of e.g. Texas - but an acre of farm land to build on in the UK might cost you £1m - 10,000x the price (or more if e.g. in the centre of London...) on that basis, we do well as our houses are bigger than 1:10,000 of a house in Texas... (NB building costs etc. will be more similar though still differ around the world... but land is the biggest issue in the UK).

anonymous said:
[redacted]
With the attitudes shown, perhaps so - but you won't find it better anywhere else...
It is a sad reflection on some parts of our society that they feel:
- they are owed a living
- owed a property
- it is someone else's responsibility to sort it out (usually the politicians / someone who has made money through hard work / their parents...)
- it is better everywhere else in the world

wake up to the real world - for generations there have been a few lucky enough to be born into wealth, everyone else has had to work to earn a living / earn a house / earn food etc. - the current 'young' generation is far better off than any before it. The average teenager owns 6 digital devices and leaves home wearing clothes and carrying devices on average worth up to £1,000 - a far cry from previous generations - today's teenager is more likely to expect new clothes / bikes / toys / phone / etc. - a generation ago, clothes were more likely to be handed down / passed to other families, bikes circulated amongst families and a few toys were all that would be in the house... Even when hitting adulthood there are now more opportunities than ever before for a variety of jobs and the ability to work worldwide, the opportunity to make money has never been so good... There has been a generation growing up where they expect their parents to both work in order to enjoy more consumables - and it seems that the same generation has now moved into their 20s and 30s somehow expecting to be bought houses as well...

get a reality check and start looking to change things, as I said above, I agree that the housing market is out of balance - but take responsibility for it, it is where it is, grouching about it will not suddenly put it back - so if there is a solution, be a part of that solution instead of expecting others to do it for you - if you are young then you have more to gain from changing the country to a better place, why should others do it for you?





JiggyJaggy

1,451 posts

141 months

Sunday 11th September 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Fleecing the young? I did this at 27. I'm not 36. I hope I still qualify as one of the "young" you are talking about. Lol. I purchased my BTL with hard saved money before you ask. No mummy daddy help. I simply didn't pi55 away all my wages when younger on beer and rubbish. Best thing I ever did as my 30's are now comfortable.

On a side note re cars it still amazes me you can lease a decent nice newish Merc for a few hundred a month yes people prefer to get a flash car and not own a home where you spend so much of your time and build most memories etc.