Katie Price discrimination

Author
Discussion

Mr Tidy

22,454 posts

128 months

Wednesday 13th March
quotequote all
CountyAFC said:
She deserves no sympathy. She lies and cheats her way through life whilst flouting laws, deceiving judges and fleecing her creditors, all behind the facade of being a single mum of a disabled child. Like everything in her life (and in her body) its fake.
thumbup

Short Grain

2,782 posts

221 months

Thursday 14th March
quotequote all
She'll be appearing on morning tv at some point soon then. Fake nails, fake tits, fake lips, fake sob story! What does she tell her kids?

98elise

26,680 posts

162 months

Thursday 14th March
quotequote all
Killer2005 said:
Chubbyross said:
What would hurt worst is if the whole world ignored her. A ban wouldn’t bother her at all. She’d keep driving anyway.
Once again

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/katie-...
Jesus Christ.

She is an absolute piss taker.

miniman

25,018 posts

263 months

Thursday 14th March
quotequote all


Laughable.

Hugo Stiglitz

37,190 posts

212 months

Thursday 14th March
quotequote all
98elise said:
Killer2005 said:
Chubbyross said:
What would hurt worst is if the whole world ignored her. A ban wouldn’t bother her at all. She’d keep driving anyway.
Once again

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/katie-...
Jesus Christ.

She is an absolute piss taker.
Many people would be doing jail time by now.

Bluevanman

7,333 posts

194 months

Thursday 14th March
quotequote all
Hugo Stiglitz said:
Many people would be doing jail time by now.
Been banned 5 times before and still escapes prison.
We need to be asking why .
It will be too late when she's run someone over.... don't forget she's already crashed her car while under the influence of drugs

Pat H

8,056 posts

257 months

Thursday 14th March
quotequote all
Bluevanman said:
Been banned 5 times before and still escapes prison.
We need to be asking why.
Probably because the offences of no licence and no insurance aren't imprisonable...



Bluevanman

7,333 posts

194 months

Thursday 14th March
quotequote all
Pat H said:
Probably because the offences of no licence and no insurance aren't imprisonable...
She's been found guilty twice before of driving whilst disqualified and that can carry a 6 month prison sentence

Pat H

8,056 posts

257 months

Thursday 14th March
quotequote all
Bluevanman said:
Pat H said:
Probably because the offences of no licence and no insurance aren't imprisonable...
She's been found guilty twice before of driving whilst disqualified and that can carry a 6 month prison sentence
Indeed it can.

But she wasn't disqualified on this occasion.



808 Estate

2,129 posts

92 months

Thursday 14th March
quotequote all
Should have been, Give her a 5 year ban.

poo at Paul's

14,162 posts

176 months

Thursday 14th March
quotequote all
So the fine is like a 20th what insurance would be, if she was able to get it.
That'll learn her.

Pathetic from the court

CT05 Nose Cone

24,993 posts

228 months

Thursday 14th March
quotequote all
Shame the courts can't ban the media from interviewing her or publishing her photos, that would be far more damaging than any fine of prison sentence.

Nigel_O

2,903 posts

220 months

Monday 18th March
quotequote all
Seems she’s been made bankrupt….

Again…

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ka...

3/4 million owed to HMRC!

Evanivitch

20,171 posts

123 months

Monday 18th March
quotequote all
I'm sure she'd make a killing doing her only fans from prison.

Katie Price said:
In October last year, Price said she was “fed up” with being threatened with legal action and would go to prison to be “done with it all”.

C5_Steve

3,144 posts

104 months

Monday 18th March
quotequote all
Nigel_O said:
Seems she’s been made bankrupt….

Again…

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ka...

3/4 million owed to HMRC!
Didn't respond to HMRC and didn't turn up for the hearing. I'm sensing a pattern here........

Evanivitch

20,171 posts

123 months

Monday 18th March
quotequote all
C5_Steve said:
Didn't respond to HMRC and didn't turn up for the hearing. I'm sensing a pattern here........
Per my quote, she thinks a custodial sentence will wipe the slate clean. I hope it doesn't.

Harry H

3,401 posts

157 months

Monday 18th March
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
Per my quote, she thinks a custodial sentence will wipe the slate clean. I hope it doesn't.
She's the one that's winning though.

They don't want to give her a custodial sentence as she's the sole family provider with multiple kids + carer responsibilities for Harvey.

They can't fine her because when she doesn't pay she's got nothing to take away.

She's beating the system right now.

Evanivitch

20,171 posts

123 months

Monday 18th March
quotequote all
Harry H said:
She's the one that's winning though.

They don't want to give her a custodial sentence as she's the sole family provider with multiple kids + carer responsibilities for Harvey.

They can't fine her because when she doesn't pay she's got nothing to take away.

She's beating the system right now.
40% of her earnings from Only Fans webcamming go to her debts directly.

She's not sole family provider. She's not carer for Harvey. The simple fact is our prisons are full and non-violent crimes rarely meet the threshold for custodial sentences.

Muzzer79

10,062 posts

188 months

Monday 18th March
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
She's not sole family provider. .
For Harvey, she is. Dwight Yorke doesn't want to know.

Rest of the kids can go to their respective Dad's but, IINM, Harvey is in a specialist home for his condition.

She'll be milking that fact for all it's worth whilst booking her next holiday to Thailand for a new tattoo and tits.

Evanivitch

20,171 posts

123 months

Monday 18th March
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
For Harvey, she is. Dwight Yorke doesn't want to know.
Harvey is 21. The state picks up the tab, and Yorke has never been financially off the hook when Harvey was a child.

But you'll read two sides to the story. One, he never paid a penny. Another that he put it all in trust to KP wouldn't financially abuse her son. I know which one I'd consider.