Insurance - is this collision now "on record"?

Insurance - is this collision now "on record"?

Author
Discussion

Bennet

Original Poster:

2,122 posts

132 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Hi.

Someone reversed into me whilst I was stationary. (Bizarre story really. They were engaging in a road rage incident with a pedestrian at the time.)

- My bumper is a bit scuffed. Their car is undamaged.
- They have taken full responsibility.
- They have reported the incident to their insurer, including my name and possibly registration plate.
- I am not planning to make any claim in relation to this, and neither are they.

From a pragmatic (rather than contractual) point of view, should I declare this incident to my insurer now, and for the next 5 years at renewal?

For clarity, if they hadn't already given the game away by reporting this, I wouldn't even be considering it.

Is this now on a database somewhere and will come back to bite if I don't declare it and then need to make an actual claim in the future?

Thanks.




E-bmw

9,240 posts

153 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
If they reported it to their insurance then my best guess would be that, that information in in their shared database & you will need to share it with yours & declare on renewal.

Declare it as a non-fault no claim with zero value & it won't change anything.

In spite of what others will CLAIM on here a non-fault claim rarely makes any difference & will only generally make a difference if there are multiple claims that basically increase your risk profile.

I have a non-fault write off that cost their insurer virtually £6000 from last year & my insurance went down on renewal.

Desiderata

2,386 posts

55 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
If it had happened while your car was parked and you weren't there, would you have known anything about it?

TwigtheWonderkid

43,407 posts

151 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
E-bmw said:
Declare it as a non-fault no claim with zero value & it won't change anything.
I think this needs to read "might not change anything", or even "probably won't change anything". But you can't say it won't change anything, because some insurers do charge extra for a non fault no cost incident.

carreauchompeur

17,852 posts

205 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
You should technically declare everything, however I think this is unlikely to be on CUE with your details listed since there is no actual claim-it’s an incident on their part.

Bennet

Original Poster:

2,122 posts

132 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
I think this needs to read "might not change anything", or even "probably won't change anything". But you can't say it won't change anything, because some insurers do charge extra for a non fault no cost incident.
Hi Twig. Appreciate the above.

Do you happen to have any insight on the "is this now on the database" question?

Thanks.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,407 posts

151 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Bennet said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
I think this needs to read "might not change anything", or even "probably won't change anything". But you can't say it won't change anything, because some insurers do charge extra for a non fault no cost incident.
Hi Twig. Appreciate the above.

Do you happen to have any insight on the "is this now on the database" question?

Thanks.
If the other party have reported the incident to their insurers, with your vehicle and name as the third party, then yes, it is on the database.

Mad Maximus

366 posts

4 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
It’s not worth the risk of being caught out now so I would tell them just incase. It’s a ste and unfair system but not a lot you can do.

2Btoo

3,429 posts

204 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Mad Maximus said:
It’s not worth the risk of being caught out now so I would tell them just incase. It’s a ste and unfair system but not a lot you can do.
Mad Maximus is right, but so is e-BMW. A singe non-fault no-cost claim is highly unlikely to make any difference to your insurance premium next year and not the tragedy many think it is. I had a non-fault claim of an alleged incident when a total CUNextTuesday alleged I had reversed into his car and put in a highly inflated claim against me. Long story cut short was that my insurance company told him to Foxtrot Oscar and my premium dropped substantially the following year.

In short: play it with a straight bat, declare it and don't lose any sleep over it.

cuprabob

14,676 posts

215 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Yes, I would tell your insurance company, not only for the reasons given above but just case they tell their insurance company you ran into the back of them. It won't be the first time someone has taken full responsibility at the scene and decided to change their story. Hopefully you have witnesses to confirm what really happened. Sadly, I'm speaking from experience.

BertBert

19,072 posts

212 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
It's not a no fault, no cost claim as no-one is claiming.

It's an accident.

Mr Tidy

22,421 posts

128 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Sadly as they have notified their insurer I think you'd need to declare it as an accident, but no claim and no cost because the data will be recorded somewhere.

e-honda

8,918 posts

147 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
You can request your data from CUE (Claims and Underwriting Exchange Database)
https://www.mib.org.uk/media/471189/data-subject-a...

fatjon

2,220 posts

214 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
It’s an accident. Even if you don’t claim and they don’t. In my first hand experience of an all but identical scenario you will likely get stung and you will be on the database.

Had I renewed it would have cost me several hundred quid to be in a parked car and get hit by a pensioner reversing. The upside is that you can shop around and not renew with your current insurer if they try to screw you, which is what I did.

Bennet

Original Poster:

2,122 posts

132 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
If the other party have reported the incident to their insurers, with your vehicle and name as the third party, then yes, it is on the database.
Thanks for this, and thanks to all.

martinbiz

3,098 posts

146 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
fatjon said:
It’s an accident. Even if you don’t claim and they don’t. In my first hand experience of an all but identical scenario you will likely get stung and you will be on the database.

Had I renewed it would have cost me several hundred quid to be in a parked car and get hit by a pensioner reversing. The upside is that you can shop around and not renew with your current insurer if they try to screw you, which is what I did.
You got stung, others may not, you cannot generalise, every risk is different

Steve-B

710 posts

283 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
To not inform your insurers OP is a risk I'd personally (like others) wouldn't take and telling them + giving them the ODs details is due-dilligence. In the discussion you should also request your insurers send you a printed letter you are not at fault.

Why? Years ago knowing autoglass is covered I got a windscreen replaced and a couple years later when I was doing new policy I forgot to inform said new insurer. They saw in the DB, contacted me and said because I had not informed them I could pay them an extra £500 or have no cover due to fraud.

Lesson learned.

martinbiz

3,098 posts

146 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Steve-B said:
To not inform your insurers OP is a risk I'd personally (like others) wouldn't take and telling them + giving them the ODs details is due-dilligence. In the discussion you should also request your insurers send you a printed letter you are not at fault.

Why? Years ago knowing autoglass is covered I got a windscreen replaced and a couple years later when I was doing new policy I forgot to inform said new insurer. They saw in the DB, contacted me and said because I had not informed them I could pay them an extra £500 or have no cover due to fraud.

Lesson learned.
Glass replacement is not normally notifiable unless they specifically ask


Edited by martinbiz on Tuesday 23 April 18:26