Turbulence Kills One

Author
Discussion

captain_cynic

12,469 posts

97 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Mark V GTD said:
I think this is coming and maybe pretty soon. In a few years time we will look back and think it was incredible that you didn’t need to wear a belt at all times on a plane.
Admittedly I've only been flying for 30 odd years, which is positively wet behind the ears for some PH flyers but we've always been told to keep your belt fastened when seated even if the seatbelt sign was turned off.

Not sure how some people interpret that as "don't bother to wear your seatbelt".

Maybe we need to keep the seatbelt sign on all the time and have an "it's presently OK to go to the loo" sign instead... Although the entitled will still ignore it.

Abc321

482 posts

97 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
I did read the turbulence thread and watched the wing flex video. All very reassuring. Personally, I find most comfort reading the pilots posts.

FWIW I fly fairly often (even though I'm scared stiff laugh and do think it has got worse, turbulence seems much more common than years gone by.

Back to thread - The pictures of the inside of the plane are crazy and its very sad the man has lost his life. It seems the biggest threat in all this is oneself.


Terry Winks

1,251 posts

15 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
TGCOTF-dewey said:
.... But the stand up bar cry
Got barred from that last year rofl

TGCOTF-dewey

5,426 posts

57 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Terry Winks said:
TGCOTF-dewey said:
.... But the stand up bar cry
Got barred from that last year rofl
That's impressive given how drunk some folks get in that bar.

5150

692 posts

257 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Jim H said:
One more question for the pilots? When you do encounter a period of severe turbulence (out of the blue) like CAT. You’ve had nothing untoward on weather radar, or warnings from other pilots ahead

Assuming you are in the cruise Auto Pilot on, obviously buckled in. Does it come as big surprise to you guys? Or does the training and experience just kick in? And simulator training?

What I mean is, are you guys getting thrown about a bit at the pointy end, and can it be a bit disorientating ?

I’m assuming the Auto Pilot clicks off immediately, and you are straight into hand-flying. Do all recovery’s follow a similar pattern as I’m again assuming each one is fairly unique scenario?

I guess whether it’s day or night, and meteorological conditions have a large impact?

Apologies that’s maybe more that one question.

I’ve been out flying my RC plane tonight, wonderful conditions - certainly no turbulence.
In 20+ years of flying, I've only once had the Autopilot disconnect due to turbulence, and funnily enough, it was the most severe turbulence I've ever experienced (couldn't focus on instruments, eyeballs felt like they were rattling in their sockets etc). That was in a turboprop which generally spend more time in the turbulent layers, compared to swept-wing jets. We have five-point harnesses that can lock in position (ie inertial-reel locked), which effectively pins you in your seat, but you can still move your arms/head/legs. . . . that's come in handy on occasions. The procedure is to leave the Autopilot ON - does a far better job of flying at high altitude than we can. Speed excursions are common in turbulence, so if they get too out of hand, we can disconnect the Autothrust which would 'chase' the speed in these examples, whereas just setting a constant thrust, maintains the energy, rather than have the engines go from Idle, to large amounts of power, back to Idle etc. . . . We also use the speed brakes (spoilers on wing) if the speeds runs away to the point where you can go through the maximum speed for the aircraft.

Sometimes you know it's coming - particularly in the lower levels where you end up flying through cumulus clouds on approach. They can be particularly bumpy, but invariably at that stage of flight, everyone is sat down in preparation for landing anyway - if they're not, then they're told to in good time.

Sometimes turbulence can come out of the blue . . . not much we can do about that, but experience can give you that feeling in the seat of your pants that you know something's coming, but generally turbulence is more of a nuisance than anything else.

Terry Winks

1,251 posts

15 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
TGCOTF-dewey said:
Terry Winks said:
TGCOTF-dewey said:
.... But the stand up bar cry
Got barred from that last year rofl
That's impressive given how drunk some folks get in that bar.
It seemed to be the cabin manager wanting to exercise his authority more than anything, we were having too good a time with the rest of the cabin crew, we were sat at it though for about 5 hours straight!

Jim H

Original Poster:

959 posts

191 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
5150 said:
Jim H said:
One more question for the pilots? When you do encounter a period of severe turbulence (out of the blue) like CAT. You’ve had nothing untoward on weather radar, or warnings from other pilots ahead

Assuming you are in the cruise Auto Pilot on, obviously buckled in. Does it come as big surprise to you guys? Or does the training and experience just kick in? And simulator training?

What I mean is, are you guys getting thrown about a bit at the pointy end, and can it be a bit disorientating ?

I’m assuming the Auto Pilot clicks off immediately, and you are straight into hand-flying. Do all recovery’s follow a similar pattern as I’m again assuming each one is fairly unique scenario?

I guess whether it’s day or night, and meteorological conditions have a large impact?

Apologies that’s maybe more that one question.

I’ve been out flying my RC plane tonight, wonderful conditions - certainly no turbulence.
In 20+ years of flying, I've only once had the Autopilot disconnect due to turbulence, and funnily enough, it was the most severe turbulence I've ever experienced (couldn't focus on instruments, eyeballs felt like they were rattling in their sockets etc). That was in a turboprop which generally spend more time in the turbulent layers, compared to swept-wing jets. We have five-point harnesses that can lock in position (ie inertial-reel locked), which effectively pins you in your seat, but you can still move your arms/head/legs. . . . that's come in handy on occasions. The procedure is to leave the Autopilot ON - does a far better job of flying at high altitude than we can. Speed excursions are common in turbulence, so if they get too out of hand, we can disconnect the Autothrust which would 'chase' the speed in these examples, whereas just setting a constant thrust, maintains the energy, rather than have the engines go from Idle, to large amounts of power, back to Idle etc. . . . We also use the speed brakes (spoilers on wing) if the speeds runs away to the point where you can go through the maximum speed for the aircraft.

Sometimes you know it's coming - particularly in the lower levels where you end up flying through cumulus clouds on approach. They can be particularly bumpy, but invariably at that stage of flight, everyone is sat down in preparation for landing anyway - if they're not, then they're told to in good time.

Sometimes turbulence can come out of the blue . . . not much we can do about that, but experience can give you that feeling in the seat of your pants that you know something's coming, but generally turbulence is more of a nuisance than anything else.
Sincerely many thanks for that 5150, so appreciated.

I’ve always been fascinated by aviation and aircraft, I’ve learned so much from the pilots who contribute on this area of the forum. Always excellent reading.

I’m just sat at Liverpool John Lennon sinking a pint of Birra Morreti before my flight to Malaga.

I’m not nervous about flying. I’m just calming my nerves after a horrendous journey down the M6 in atrocious conditions ( spray and standing water).

I recall I said in my other thread, and it’s the age old thing. The most dangerous part of going on holiday is the journey to the airport.

On a motorway you are surrounded by thousands of folk who you have no idea what they are going to do next in dangerous conditions.

At least when you get on airplane, those driving it, got there by being rather good to say the least.

Mabbs9

1,117 posts

220 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Jim H said:
Sincerely many thanks for that 5150, so appreciated.

I’ve always been fascinated by aviation and aircraft, I’ve learned so much from the pilots who contribute on this area of the forum. Always excellent reading.

I’m just sat at Liverpool John Lennon sinking a pint of Birra Morreti before my flight to Malaga.

I’m not nervous about flying. I’m just calming my nerves after a horrendous journey down the M6 in atrocious conditions ( spray and standing water).

I recall I said in my other thread, and it’s the age old thing. The most dangerous part of going on holiday is the journey to the airport.

On a motorway you are surrounded by thousands of folk who you have no idea what they are going to do next in dangerous conditions.

At least when you get on airplane, those driving it, got there by being rather good to say the least.
Also worth remembering that the people up front also want to return safely to their families smile. Have a good trip to Malaga.

Ken_Code

1,332 posts

4 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Mabbs9 said:
Also worth remembering that the people up front also want to return safely to their families smile. Have a good trip to Malaga.
Well, mostly.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanwings_Flight...

Simpo Two

85,883 posts

267 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
It is, as I heard on the BBC, 'because climate change'...

I prefer 'passengers were propelled into the ceiling after running into severe flatulence'.

airbusA346

1,116 posts

155 months

Sunday 26th May
quotequote all
A Qatar Airways 787-9 flying from Doha to Dublin has experienced turbulence over Turkey. 12 people (6 crew members & 6 passengers) have reported injuries.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5117ev8n7xo

simon_harris

1,437 posts

36 months

Wednesday 29th May
quotequote all
BBC news at 10 just reported that this incident was due to a gravitational anomaly?

The report then went on to talk about turbulence but the lead in mentioned gravity - wtaf?

MitchT

15,981 posts

211 months

Wednesday 29th May
quotequote all
Saw that. At least they didn't mention an "air pocket"!

Simpo Two

85,883 posts

267 months

Thursday 30th May
quotequote all
simon_harris said:
BBC news at 10 just reported that this incident was due to a gravitational anomaly?
Pillocks. Journos really should be forced to do a year of science before being let loose on the public.

Jim H

Original Poster:

959 posts

191 months

Friday 14th June
quotequote all
Did anyone else see this?

That’s serious hail
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/austrian-airlines...

The cockpit glass is, well, frightening.

I’d like to ask the pilots.

Do you actually need to respond to what you can barely see through the windshield.

Are instruments enough?

Edited by Jim H on Friday 14th June 18:40

IanH755

1,880 posts

122 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Jim H said:
Do you actually need to respond to what you can barely see through the windshield.
biggrin


Jim H

Original Poster:

959 posts

191 months

Saturday
quotequote all
IanH755 said:
Jim H said:
Do you actually need to respond to what you can barely see through the windshield.
biggrin

Funny.

I have no doubt that visual reference is sometimes, often lost by pilots on approach.

A bit of a inconvenience.

But when hail has broken the the windshield, to that extent. Is there a step in the QRH for that?

And ripped the cowl off the weather radar dome?

My guess is that’s a bit unusual.?

u-boat

738 posts

16 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Jim H said:
Funny.

I have no doubt that visual reference is sometimes, often lost by pilots on approach.

A bit of a inconvenience.

But when hail has broken the the windshield, to that extent. Is there a step in the QRH for that?

And ripped the cowl off the weather radar dome?

My guess is that’s a bit unusual.?
Depends on the aircraft, some definitely tell you to open the side DV (direct vision) window if you can’t see out the front, some aircraft you can’t open the windows though so you just have to deal with it, in this case an automatic landing would likely be the best course of action,

The inside of that Austrian airlines aircraft looked like this




So it’s possibly better than some imagined,

The outside again





Edited by u-boat on Saturday 15th June 23:57

Jim H

Original Poster:

959 posts

191 months

Thank you u-boat.

That inside view tells a different story, it doesn’t look too bad from the FO’s seat position.

I dare say it was still a bit of a shock for the crew in the event.

When you mention ‘automatic landing’, is that something the auto pilot takes care of?


bitchstewie

52,291 posts

212 months

Presume that damage is "just" to the outside layer of glass though?

So the safety issue was not being able to see rather than the window actually giving?