Russia Invades Ukraine. Volume 4
Discussion
off_again said:
You are somewhat splitting hairs here. Yes, technically, based on the specified date - Feb 2022, vs Feb 2024, there is a big difference in the amount of land seized by Russia. So yes, technically you are correct.
Well, you are the ones splitting hairs about whether i am correct, technically or otherwise. my point of contention with the post above was that it stated 'the russians had gained little ground' - that does not quite match what is on the ground because the russians quite obvious are in control of a big chunk of land more than pre war. I'm not exactly saying that they have not completely failed at their initial objectives and shown an impressive amount of incompetence because they also manifestly have done so and your constantly reference to how they are supposed to be the 2nd most powerful military is neither here nor there.
isaldiri said:
off_again said:
You are somewhat splitting hairs here. Yes, technically, based on the specified date - Feb 2022, vs Feb 2024, there is a big difference in the amount of land seized by Russia. So yes, technically you are correct.
Well, you are the ones splitting hairs about whether i am correct, technically or otherwise. my point of contention with the post above was that it stated 'the russians had gained little ground' - that does not quite match what is on the ground because the russians quite obvious are in control of a big chunk of land more than pre war. I'm not exactly saying that they have not completely failed at their initial objectives and shown an impressive amount of incompetence because they also manifestly have done so and your constantly reference to how they are supposed to be the 2nd most powerful military is neither here nor there.
Even if they are forced to hand back everything bar a lonely cattle shed, they will consider it a victory.
Earlier on today, they sent a tank down a road to deliberately set off a mine. Tank destroyed, crew dead, mine cleared - job done.
These are not "normal" people. Don't try to judge them by our standards.
A Slowak PM has been shot and the shooter a 71 year old pro rusky. The man has had some training by spetznaz. No wonder he got through the security. I am very surprised that Robert Fico was't hard enough with his politics?
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/05/15/7455...
Sky news quoted hate speech on the net. I thought that this tune and lyrics represent it.
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/05/15/7455...
Sky news quoted hate speech on the net. I thought that this tune and lyrics represent it.
isaldiri said:
off_again said:
You are somewhat splitting hairs here. Yes, technically, based on the specified date - Feb 2022, vs Feb 2024, there is a big difference in the amount of land seized by Russia. So yes, technically you are correct.
Well, you are the ones splitting hairs about whether i am correct, technically or otherwise. my point of contention with the post above was that it stated 'the russians had gained little ground' - that does not quite match what is on the ground because the russians quite obvious are in control of a big chunk of land more than pre war. I'm not exactly saying that they have not completely failed at their initial objectives and shown an impressive amount of incompetence because they also manifestly have done so and your constantly reference to how they are supposed to be the 2nd most powerful military is neither here nor there.
Context is critical and we should all make sure we add it where we can. But often emotion gets in the way and we fail to add it. Thats OK, but it does happen.
https://twitter.com/Doktor_Klein/status/1790766793...
Ukraine free to use US weapons to directly target Russia.
Russian airbases hit again
https://twitter.com/Mylovanov/status/1790861735936...
Ukraine free to use US weapons to directly target Russia.
Russian airbases hit again
https://twitter.com/Mylovanov/status/1790861735936...
Biggy Stardust said:
That they have 500k troops massed ready to pounce. I say again- it doesn't match reality.
I didnt reference that at any point am afraid - I just asked a question, so not sure what the point is. My question was open ended, what happens if Russia manages to advance fully into Ukraine - its not difficult to read my post to see that I didnt specifically agree/disagree with their troop numbers or capability.If you are going to pick on something I said then make it relevant to what I asked please.
halo34 said:
Biggy Stardust said:
That they have 500k troops massed ready to pounce. I say again- it doesn't match reality.
I didnt reference that at any point am afraid - I just asked a question, so not sure what the point is. My question was open ended, what happens if Russia manages to advance fully into Ukraine - its not difficult to read my post to see that I didnt specifically agree/disagree with their troop numbers or capability.If you are going to pick on something I said then make it relevant to what I asked please.
While Ukrainian forces are well-trained and well-armed, a war of attrition where Russia can deploy ten times more troops would be catastrophic. Various combat footage shows Ukrainian defenders constantly outnumbered but still managing to hold the line. However, if Ukraine cannot rotate its frontline troops, combat fatigue will inevitably set in.
redback911 said:
My bad. I mentioned the 500,000 troops reportedly being amassed on the front line, based on some media reports. I sincerely hope this is just misinformation or propaganda because the alternative would be dire.
You were just out by a factor of 10 - the reported number is 50k. Easy mistake to make. (But significant!)https://twitter.com/PStyle0ne1/status/179100141914...
Ukrainian perspective on the latest Russian offensive.
Ukrainian perspective on the latest Russian offensive.
redback911 said:
My bad. I mentioned the 500,000 troops reportedly being amassed on the front line, based on some media reports. I sincerely hope this is just misinformation or propaganda because the alternative would be dire.
While Ukrainian forces are well-trained and well-armed, a war of attrition where Russia can deploy ten times more troops would be catastrophic. Various combat footage shows Ukrainian defenders constantly outnumbered but still managing to hold the line. However, if Ukraine cannot rotate its frontline troops, combat fatigue will inevitably set in.
Dont worry, I honestly wasnt actually picking up on that. While Ukrainian forces are well-trained and well-armed, a war of attrition where Russia can deploy ten times more troops would be catastrophic. Various combat footage shows Ukrainian defenders constantly outnumbered but still managing to hold the line. However, if Ukraine cannot rotate its frontline troops, combat fatigue will inevitably set in.
It was a broader thought about Russia wearing Ukraine down over time and making gains enough that we see them "rolling" right in - my phrasing was perhaps wrong.
In a war of attrition more than a single push.
martynr said:
A Slowak PM has been shot and the shooter a 71 year old pro rusky. The man has had some training by spetznaz. No wonder he got through the security. I am very surprised that Robert Fico was't hard enough with his politics?
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/05/15/7455...
Sky news quoted hate speech on the net. I thought that this tune and lyrics represent it.
Judging by what I'm reading in the Slovak press, I'd say the story is significantly more nuanced than your statement implies. And for the record, there's no indication he's pro Russia; Fico is though.https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/05/15/7455...
Sky news quoted hate speech on the net. I thought that this tune and lyrics represent it.
redback911 said:
While Ukrainian forces are well-trained and well-armed, a war of attrition where Russia can deploy ten times more troops would be catastrophic.
Well-armed? Isn't the major concern that they are not at all, and are running out of munitions, such that they have little to shoot back with relative to the hordes of Russians shelling the hell out of everything. And they lack AA kit so Russia is able to attack from the air too. Russia seems to have taken advantage of the slow supplies from Europe and the Republcian tts stalling the aid package.US are worried (sorry if paywall): https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/14/us/politics/rus...
I find a lot of commentary here over-optimistic, but sincerely hope they are right and I am not.
borcy said:
https://twitter.com/Doktor_Klein/status/1790766793...
Ukraine free to use US weapons to directly target Russia.
Russian airbases hit again
https://twitter.com/Mylovanov/status/1790861735936...
That is a significant change of tune from the US and echoes what Cameron (I think) said recently about UK weapons. Finally seems that the NATO/Supporting countries are really seeing the gravity of the situation and understand that being “worried about escalation” is folly.Ukraine free to use US weapons to directly target Russia.
Russian airbases hit again
https://twitter.com/Mylovanov/status/1790861735936...
Great to see ATACMS being used deep in to Crimea…another S400 battery cops it as well as aircraft, fuel and munitions. Seems like there’s nothing the Russians can do to stop ATACMS, maybe just maybe things might be about to get much more difficult for the Russians. I remember when HIMARS started being used the quoted impact on Russian logistics was huge….ATACMS has twice the range and with the cluster munitions will be more effective I imagine.
BikeBikeBIke said:
redback911 said:
My bad. I mentioned the 500,000 troops reportedly being amassed on the front line, based on some media reports. I sincerely hope this is just misinformation or propaganda because the alternative would be dire.
You were just out by a factor of 10 - the reported number is 50k. Easy mistake to make. (But significant!)https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications...
Pupp said:
BikeBikeBIke said:
redback911 said:
My bad. I mentioned the 500,000 troops reportedly being amassed on the front line, based on some media reports. I sincerely hope this is just misinformation or propaganda because the alternative would be dire.
You were just out by a factor of 10 - the reported number is 50k. Easy mistake to make. (But significant!)https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications...
Good report in the DT today on the latest offensive
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/05/16/...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/05/16/...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff