What's your experience of being 'really fit'

What's your experience of being 'really fit'

Author
Discussion

oddman

Original Poster:

2,409 posts

254 months

Monday 20th May
quotequote all
Vinocasino said:
Took up triathlon in Covid in my early 40s and kept it going (so 4 years now). Did Barcelona Full Iron Man (+ some halves). My experience of peak fitness is very close to what you listed. I would also add the feeling of not being fat / wobbly and generally just feeling "strong", combined with all your clothes fitting better which for me is a great feeling. On the negative, I would say peak fitness normally coincides with me falling asleep on the sofa in the evening at about 9pm (even if just for a micro nap). Thats normally because ive been up at 530am running of cycling around a London Park
For me, I think weight is an essential component as I don't think I've ever felt really fit at over 80kg (although that's where I habitually dwell). I think clothes fitting well is a good psychological boost. This leaves me extremely sceptical of the 'fit at any weight' advocates as this doesn't tally with my experience. Others mileage may vary.


plenty

4,767 posts

188 months

Monday 20th May
quotequote all
Never been a physical person but RN in my fifties I'm probably fitter than I've ever been, thanks to regular weight training for the past four months. Which isn't a lot compared with athletes, but is certainly enough to start experiencing the benefits.

Enjoying the confidence and the calmness, the mental clarity, the vastly increased energy, fewer aches and pains, being more in tune with my body.

The endorphins that are released during and after a training session are addictive indeed - I walk out of the gym as if on air, with a massive spring in my step.

And although I haven't been training cardio I do feel my endurance has improved as well every time I walk up the steps.

Regular activity is the key. After as few as 3-4 days without activity I have to steel myself that much more to get back in the gym, and the first session back is harder work.

President Merkin

3,538 posts

21 months

Monday 20th May
quotequote all
Thing on endorphins, my missus used to day she loved it when I played squash because I was always in a good mood after. I never noticed but I suppose there must be something in it.

pb8g09

2,433 posts

71 months

Monday 20th May
quotequote all
Played semi-pro rugby in my late teens/early twenties. Carried on at amateur level and retired last year. Things are aching and making cracking noises that shouldn't at my age.

Still enjoy powerlifting but struggle to find the energy these days to keep it consistent for more than 3/4 weeks.

Try to play golf but get mentally shattered around hole 12-14 and lose all my concentration so end up getting annoyed and scoring high.

I'm 32 but reckon I've got the body of a 45 year old, albeit with some decent muscle mass.


plenty

4,767 posts

188 months

Monday 20th May
quotequote all
pb8g09 said:
Played semi-pro rugby in my late teens/early twenties. Carried on at amateur level and retired last year. Things are aching and making cracking noises that shouldn't at my age.
Ironically I think having avoided sports and fitness my entire life until recently has worked out ok. No aches and pains or lingering injuries to speak of. And instead of comparing myself to how I used to be, I'm enjoying benefits I never experienced when I was younger.

ChocolateFrog

26,023 posts

175 months

Monday 20th May
quotequote all
For me it's always hindsight, never while I've actually been fit.

The 3 fittest times of my life.

As a teenager swimming 4/5 times a week for 1-2 hrs a session plus other sports casually. Best abs I've ever had by a country mile. Used to get people commenting on my shoulders and tris and i would wonder what they were on about. Was never the best swimmer in the club so never felt fit. Thinking back we did a couple of fitness tests at school, a bleep test and a test where we were spaced out around the gym hall and you had to catch the person in front of you. I won both pretty comfortably much to the resentment of the school bullies.

In the Army in Germany I was with a couple of lads who were extremely fit, European level Triathlon/Biathlon level. I used to tag along on 100 mile cycles and 2 hr runs (I'm not much of a runner even then, I'd usually be dropped at some point). As point 1 I wasn't the fittest so didn't feel fit but looking back that was the fittest I've ever been. I do remember having odd days where we could cycle 5/6hrs and your legs just felt "there' the whole way, cyclists will understand.

Then about 5 years ago got into lifting, Bench mainly but also deadlift. Went to the gym 6/7 days a week. Not huge numbers but pretty strong, same sort of thing again, training with someone who repped 210 on the bench and seated deadlift 500kg makes you feel weak but then if I pick 100kg now it feels heavy and that used to be our second warm up weight biglaugh

The theme being you're probably fitter than you think right now.

Edited by ChocolateFrog on Monday 20th May 14:09

nuyorican

906 posts

104 months

Monday 20th May
quotequote all
Late teens. Used to cycle five miles to work in a factory where I'd bend automotive pipes onto a jig. Immense upper-body workout all day combined with the CV/fat cutting benefits of the cycling meant I was a tall lad anyway with big arms and visible abs.

My experience of being fit was having to beat them off with a stty stick.

Oh to go back...

Slow.Patrol

580 posts

16 months

Monday 20th May
quotequote all
I was a total gym junkie in my early 30s. I went 3-4 days a week for an hour of intensive workout followed by a 1km swim. I had a 17% fat score and defined muscles.

Then I started to get knee issues followed by two operations, including a lateral release and then followed by rheumatoid arthritis which on some days makes my limbs feel like lead.

I loved being really fit. It was great to have energy and not go swimming and feel like I am in concrete and not water. I still try to keep fitish as it would be so easy to just give up and sit around all day, but that will only end in one way, very quickly.

Pete102

2,060 posts

188 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
I played Ice Hockey consistently from age 11 to roughly age 30, including professionally for a short while. Whilst I was fit I did not consider myself to be overly fit, although I did supplement my training with weights every morning which led to some respectable squat / bench / deadlift numbers.

I then took up Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, a different kind of fitness which did wonders for my cardio but meant I was consistently sore or injured, again not exactly super fit.

Now, although I still practice BJJ, I have transitioned into road, trail and mountain running across a range of distances (up to 50km). I can confidently say that I am fitter now than I have ever been, running most days and putting in 45km a week. DOMS and other associated injuries seem to be entirely manageable for now.

My only issue is control of weight, I still need to eat consciously otherwise I will get heavier without much effort, its a curse I tell ya.

okgo

38,475 posts

200 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
It’s an interesting thing - people perceive fitness in different ways -IMO being ‘very fit’ is easily measurable against levels in that sport or pursuit (assuming it’s physical). But as you allude to there, you were even professional in one thing despite not being super fit.

Chocolate frog is right too, you can be fit ‘for you’ but doesn’t mean you’re actually ‘very fit’ in an actual sense. Things like parkrun and sportives and the like lead you to think that someone running 19 min 5k is very fit, or getting a gold time in the He’ll of Ashdown is very fit. But the reality is that they’d be nowhere in a local run club/road racing league where the people are very fit (assuming we’re keeping a vague distinction between pro and amateur) and would wipe the floor with you.


Pete102

2,060 posts

188 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
okgo said:
It’s an interesting thing - people perceive fitness in different ways -IMO being ‘very fit’ is easily measurable against levels in that sport or pursuit (assuming it’s physical). But as you allude to there, you were even professional in one thing despite not being super fit.

Chocolate frog is right too, you can be fit ‘for you’ but doesn’t mean you’re actually ‘very fit’ in an actual sense. Things like parkrun and sportives and the like lead you to think that someone running 19 min 5k is very fit, or getting a gold time in the He’ll of Ashdown is very fit. But the reality is that they’d be nowhere in a local run club/road racing league where the people are very fit (assuming we’re keeping a vague distinction between pro and amateur) and would wipe the floor with you.
Entirely agree, over the last year I have seen my 5k tumble to below 20 minutes, a huge effort at the time....then I see more experienced, quicker, lighter, better runners routinely hitting 15 minutes!, absolutely next level.

There is always the other side of the coin...most who exercise regularly are far ahead of those who don't. I have recently competed in a few mountain running events, these consist of a 6km run up a 5 or 600 meter elevation mountain road or hiking path. Its all elevation and no opportunities for recovery unless you stop. Being able to complete these events in a reasonable time is commendable given that most of the general population get out of breath walking up a flight of stairs.

Mars

8,795 posts

216 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
Fat knacker until I was 52yo then I had a life-change and started cycling 7-days/week. Lost 30Kg and felt like Superman.

Ken_Code

1,299 posts

4 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
okgo said:
It’s an interesting thing - people perceive fitness in different ways -IMO being ‘very fit’ is easily measurable against levels in that sport or pursuit (assuming it’s physical). But as you allude to there, you were even professional in one thing despite not being super fit.

Chocolate frog is right too, you can be fit ‘for you’ but doesn’t mean you’re actually ‘very fit’ in an actual sense. Things like parkrun and sportives and the like lead you to think that someone running 19 min 5k is very fit, or getting a gold time in the He’ll of Ashdown is very fit. But the reality is that they’d be nowhere in a local run club/road racing league where the people are very fit (assuming we’re keeping a vague distinction between pro and amateur) and would wipe the floor with you.
It’s not just about fitness though. I was as fit as it was possible to be, but I’m not built for any sort of distance running.

At my peak I was able to run an 11 second 100m, which was pretty decent, but have only once or twice run a 5k in under 20 minutes, which is absolutely rubbish.

jonathan_roberts

333 posts

10 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
I'm 37 and in excellent shape, and honestly it feels fantastic. At this stage in life, people seem to choose to either prioritise their fitness or let things slide. I've always been active and never struggled with weight, but I've definitely taken a more systematic approach to my fitness over the past three years.

I naturally wake up early every day and usually feel ready to sleep by 22:30. My weekly routine includes running 2-3 times, weight training 2-3 times, and maintaining an active lifestyle that encompasses cycling, swimming, hiking, sailing, kayaking, skiing, and tennis. My diet is high in protein, though I don’t obsess over it. I also maintain a year-round tan and healthy skin.

While I don’t want to sound too Patrick Bateman about it, one of the greatest benefits of this lifestyle is feeling physically prepared for anything that comes my way, whether it's new opportunities or spontaneous activities, without fear of injury. This readiness allows me to actively engage with my kids and generally push the envelope more than others who might lead more sedentary lives. As a parent I think it is important to show your kids that moving is normal. There is a time and a place for lolling around on the sofa, but its far more fun to be out and about.

Additionally, my fitness level provides me with an abundance of energy. Where most might call it a day after one activity, I can easily fit in a trail run after a day of skiing, or enjoy a hike to a fishing spot on vacation, or play tennis with my wife after returning from a run. This ability to do more means I experience more and achieve more each day.

I think the most important thing for me though is that I know that by being fit and strong, I am increasing my chances of enjoying life for longer. Most people seem to slow down once they reach 50. Barring serious illness, there is no reason why I can't enjoy everything I do activity wise well into my 70's. My wife and I will also "retire" at 50 and go travelling when both kids have left home. I want to be in great shape for that so I can take advantage of everything that travelling has to offer.

okgo

38,475 posts

200 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
Ken_Code said:
It’s not just about fitness though. I was as fit as it was possible to be, but I’m not built for any sort of distance running.

At my peak I was able to run an 11 second 100m, which was pretty decent, but have only once or twice run a 5k in under 20 minutes, which is absolutely rubbish.
11 second 100 is very decent junior pace though no?

It’s certainly a different effort and a different build required but still I guess ‘fitness’ if you can measure it.

oddman

Original Poster:

2,409 posts

254 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
okgo said:
It’s an interesting thing - people perceive fitness in different ways -IMO being ‘very fit’ is easily measurable against levels in that sport or pursuit (assuming it’s physical). But as you allude to there, you were even professional in one thing despite not being super fit.

Chocolate frog is right too, you can be fit ‘for you’ but doesn’t mean you’re actually ‘very fit’ in an actual sense. Things like parkrun and sportives and the like lead you to think that someone running 19 min 5k is very fit, or getting a gold time in the He’ll of Ashdown is very fit. But the reality is that they’d be nowhere in a local run club/road racing league where the people are very fit (assuming we’re keeping a vague distinction between pro and amateur) and would wipe the floor with you.
I'd slightly take issue with this. Elite amateurs and pros not only prepare and train well but are usually the most genetically blessed.

Those of us who didn't choose their parents as well can still consider themselves fit if we're maximising our potential.

I'd contend that the emotional and physical benefits (and risks) of training to potential are as significant for carthorses as they are for racehorses


Edited by oddman on Tuesday 21st May 19:54

gregs656

10,950 posts

183 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
okgo said:
It’s an interesting thing - people perceive fitness in different ways -IMO being ‘very fit’ is easily measurable against levels in that sport or pursuit (assuming it’s physical). But as you allude to there, you were even professional in one thing despite not being super fit.

Chocolate frog is right too, you can be fit ‘for you’ but doesn’t mean you’re actually ‘very fit’ in an actual sense. Things like parkrun and sportives and the like lead you to think that someone running 19 min 5k is very fit, or getting a gold time in the He’ll of Ashdown is very fit. But the reality is that they’d be nowhere in a local run club/road racing league where the people are very fit (assuming we’re keeping a vague distinction between pro and amateur) and would wipe the floor with you.
Not sure I agree with the sentiment here. Someone can be very fit and not be competitive at a professional level, or even at an amateur level. I don't think fitness and competitiveness are analogous.

I'd also say that there is a lesson in this thread to judge your self against your self.

Another project

972 posts

111 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
As a kid I was a lazy st and would rather play playstation than do anything physical, I went on a healthy eating and fitness phase in my mid twenties but a couple of minor injuries meant I fell off the wagon after about a year. Now I'm mid thirties and had a bit of a shock at how much I'd let myself go so I got back into the gym and started playing attention to my diet a bit more. That was 2 years ago and I think I'm in the best shape I've ever been in, I'm stronger, can run faster and further I could in my twenties but I find I struggle more with injuries a lot more

okgo

38,475 posts

200 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
gregs656 said:
Not sure I agree with the sentiment here. Someone can be very fit and not be competitive at a professional level, or even at an amateur level. I don't think fitness and competitiveness are analogous.

I'd also say that there is a lesson in this thread to judge your self against your self.
There is a point that anyone can get to given training. I think some well known cycle coaches basically came up with 4 w/kg or so was possible for anyone if they trained properly. That’s pretty fit. You won’t be troubling the ones with genetics as mentioned above but you’ve got a fair claim at being very fit.

My point is that many people might think themselves very fit, but if they ever saw VERY fit in whatever it is they do they’d quickly realise they were probably somewhat wide of the mark. It’s a feeling most people have when they try racing for the first time I expect (in many sports).

Anyway, it is what it is, I appreciate cycling and running are very easy sports to ‘measure’ and ability is there for everyone to see. Less easy in sports that require more skill to be competitive.

Ken_Code

1,299 posts

4 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
okgo said:
11 second 100 is very decent junior pace though no?

It’s certainly a different effort and a different build required but still I guess ‘fitness’ if you can measure it.
Yes, it was a very good level, but I suppose that my point was that no matter how I trained I was never going to be capable of achieving “equivalent” at middle-distance or further.

The very best of training could never get me as close to the 5k record as it did to the 100m one.