What's your experience of being 'really fit'

What's your experience of being 'really fit'

Author
Discussion

okgo

38,479 posts

200 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
Ken_Code said:
Yes, it was a very good level, but I suppose that my point was that no matter how I trained I was never going to be capable of achieving “equivalent” at middle-distance or further.

The very best of training could never get me as close to the 5k record as it did to the 100m one.
Yes. No amount of training will give you the physique of a top distance runner. I could ride 30 hours a week and I’m not going to be built like Romain Bardet.

Bill

53,142 posts

257 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
okgo said:
There is a point that anyone can get to given training. I think some well known cycle coaches basically came up with 4 w/kg or so was possible for anyone if they trained properly. That’s pretty fit. You won’t be troubling the ones with genetics as mentioned above but you’ve got a fair claim at being very fit.

My point is that many people might think themselves very fit, but if they ever saw VERY fit in whatever it is they do they’d quickly realise they were probably somewhat wide of the mark. It’s a feeling most people have when they try racing for the first time I expect (in many sports).

Anyway, it is what it is, I appreciate cycling and running are very easy sports to ‘measure’ and ability is there for everyone to see. Less easy in sports that require more skill to be competitive.
It's also very one dimensional. Not many distance runners would last the distance on a professional rugby pitch, or deal well with a 20k yomp carrying 30kg pack.

okgo

38,479 posts

200 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
Bill said:
It's also very one dimensional. Not many distance runners would last the distance on a professional rugby pitch, or deal well with a 20k yomp carrying 30kg pack.
That is true. But usually to be very fit you can measure it in some way.

mcelliott

8,741 posts

183 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
My experience of being really fit, and I don't think it's been mentioned yet is managing fatigue and tiredness, there is a fine line between feeling fit and strong at a high level and tipping over the edge.

popeyewhite

20,195 posts

122 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
okgo said:
Bill said:
It's also very one dimensional. Not many distance runners would last the distance on a professional rugby pitch, or deal well with a 20k yomp carrying 30kg pack.
That is true. But usually to be very fit you can measure it in some way.
Actually lots of endurance running training is ideal training for Rugby players. Means you recover quicker during a game. distance runners would be fine. Of course if trained solely in endurance running they may not be that quick... but the real difference would be bodyweight and power off the blocks.

Bill

53,142 posts

257 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
okgo said:
But usually to be very fit you can measure it in some way.
Yeah, maybe. For me it's only in hindsight a couple of periods in my life I was properly fit. I never trained, I just went and did a lot climbing or trekking. 3 months in Yosemite doing big walls and 4 months in South America doing a series of treks at up to 5,750m.

There's no way of measuring that, but there were a couple of times that are memorable and make me realise I must have been.

The first was on the third day of a hike in the Grand Canyon and we were having a late start, last to leave the campsite in the bottom and first at the youth hostel at the top. Four or five hours up hill with packs and it wasn't hard.

On the second trip we'd had to turn back on the Torres del Paine circuit as the pass was snowbound. It was day 5 or 6 and our kit had finally dried out after days of rain but as we got to the campsite it started to rain again so we decided to push on another 12 miles or so to the bus stop and get out. So we cracked on and did maybe 25 miles of rough paths, bog, river crossings. Plus I was carrying most of the camping gear etc because my wife had tweaked her knee, so 20kg+.

I don't know how fit that is but they were big days and although not effortless not hard. These days, at 53 and making time to exercise with kids, job etc it's a lot harder to feel that capable.

popeyewhite

20,195 posts

122 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
mcelliott said:
My experience of being really fit, and I don't think it's been mentioned yet is managing fatigue and tiredness, there is a fine line between feeling fit and strong at a high level and tipping over the edge.
Lol, and the older you get... .

Bill

53,142 posts

257 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
Actually lots of endurance running training is ideal training for Rugby players. Means you recover quicker during a game. distance runners would be fine. Of course if trained solely in endurance running they may not be that quick... but the real difference would be bodyweight and power off the blocks.
That's my point, good at the running, not so hot at the breakdown.

popeyewhite

20,195 posts

122 months

Tuesday 21st May
quotequote all
Bill said:
popeyewhite said:
Actually lots of endurance running training is ideal training for Rugby players. Means you recover quicker during a game. distance runners would be fine. Of course if trained solely in endurance running they may not be that quick... but the real difference would be bodyweight and power off the blocks.
That's my point, good at the running, not so hot at the breakdown.
thumbup

oddman

Original Poster:

2,409 posts

254 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Bill said:
okgo said:
But usually to be very fit you can measure it in some way.
Yeah, maybe. For me it's only in hindsight a couple of periods in my life I was properly fit. I never trained, I just went and did a lot climbing or trekking. 3 months in Yosemite doing big walls and 4 months in South America doing a series of treks at up to 5,750m.

There's no way of measuring that, but there were a couple of times that are memorable and make me realise I must have been.

The first was on the third day of a hike in the Grand Canyon and we were having a late start, last to leave the campsite in the bottom and first at the youth hostel at the top. Four or five hours up hill with packs and it wasn't hard.

On the second trip we'd had to turn back on the Torres del Paine circuit as the pass was snowbound. It was day 5 or 6 and our kit had finally dried out after days of rain but as we got to the campsite it started to rain again so we decided to push on another 12 miles or so to the bus stop and get out. So we cracked on and did maybe 25 miles of rough paths, bog, river crossings. Plus I was carrying most of the camping gear etc because my wife had tweaked her knee, so 20kg+.

I don't know how fit that is but they were big days and although not effortless not hard. These days, at 53 and making time to exercise with kids, job etc it's a lot harder to feel that capable.
I think that's true. No one would dispute that Alex Honnold is one of the fittest men on the planet and what he does goes beyond metrics as does the activity of many adventure seekers. My areas of activity probably bridge the divide between your outdoor adventures and OKGOs competetive cycling. I got into mountain biking in my 20s as something to do when the rock was wet. Turns out I liked it and was reasonably good at it but far too late to be seriously competetive. As I got into my 30s and far beyond I needed to do more training to get the most out of limited time in big mountains. Running and cycling really helps prepare for that. Interestingly my mates who were naturally gifted athletes, county runners, national champions in cycling, have rather taken historical fitness for granted and expected to come into form quickly soon before or whilst on a trip - often to their regret.

The big change that's happened since my 20s is the ability to record, track and publish my stats; dive into physiological data and plan training.

Most of my friends who are into climbing, skiing are posting their activity on Strava and for most of us (apart from the professional guides who spend extended periods in the mountains) the regular meat and potatoes training is runs, rides, walks and a bit of strength training.

Another way I see fitness is that it's synonymous with 'ready' 'prepared'. I like to think that by keeping up with training up to 20k off road running 80k mountain bike 100+k hilly road ride then if a mate calls me and says 'Do you fancy.......How about it?' I'm only one training cycle away from adjusting the specificity of my activity to meet that objective.

CLK-GTR

839 posts

247 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
I kickboxed in my youth and played semi professional football for a few years, the feeling I miss was the lightness on your feet. In daily life I never got tired and any hike, bike ride, run, swim, gym session or other activity anybody wanted to do i could join with ease. I did a marathon with virtually no specific training. I've been lucky enough to have a decent natural fitness my whole life but I don't think I'll ever get back to that level.

popeyewhite

20,195 posts

122 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
oddman said:
No one would dispute that Alex Honnold is one of the fittest men on the planet
He's obviously very fit, but one of the fittest on the planet?

mcelliott

8,741 posts

183 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
oddman said:
No one would dispute that Alex Honnold is one of the fittest men on the planet
He's obviously very fit, but one of the fittest on the planet?
Then what do you define as fitness, the guy that can hang from a wall for hours on end or someone that can win the Tour de France? Too many nuances

CLK-GTR

839 posts

247 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
He's obviously very fit, but one of the fittest on the planet?
I've always given that accolade to tour cyclists. Certainly not a rock climber.

President Merkin

3,538 posts

21 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Tour cyclists are one cohort I would trust slightly less than an email from a NIgerian general.

Zaichik

134 posts

38 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
my experience of feeling 'really fit' is the feeling you get when descending from a very high altitude climb - coming down from 8000m every metre you descend you feel stronger a more powerful and the hike out from basecamps around the 5/6000m level down to 2000m you are positively superhuman.

All returns to normal after a could weeks though sadly.

CLK-GTR

839 posts

247 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
President Merkin said:
Tour cyclists are one cohort I would trust slightly less than an email from a NIgerian general.
However they do it, they're bloody fit.

VO2 max is the one metric that is reliably representative of being ultra fit. The records are dominated by cyclists and cross country skiers, with the odd long distance runner thrown in.

paulrockliffe

15,801 posts

229 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
okgo said:
Bill said:
It's also very one dimensional. Not many distance runners would last the distance on a professional rugby pitch, or deal well with a 20k yomp carrying 30kg pack.
That is true. But usually to be very fit you can measure it in some way.
Actually lots of endurance running training is ideal training for Rugby players. Means you recover quicker during a game. distance runners would be fine. Of course if trained solely in endurance running they may not be that quick... but the real difference would be bodyweight and power off the blocks.
When I was very fit, circa 15m 5k, 12s 100m fit, I still kept my hand in at hockey, I was completely unplayable, no one got near me all game. If they did I just jogged somewhere else, at a speed they could keep up with for 10mins, let alone all game. I would just mark my man out of the game for the first half then do whatever I wanted in the second half, just kept moving until I was left alone, scored loads of goals by arriving in the box unmarked.

I would have got halfed playing rugby for sure, but I would have scored loads as a winger too.

What I learned was it's so much less about top speed and much more about where you start sprinting from, if you have the endurance to move 20 yards more than your opponent before the sprint starts, then someone with 10 yards of pace more still won't catch you. I was quick for a distance runner, but no one running similar 5/10k times to me would be anything you would consider slow, they would dust 90% of pro rugby players, let alone amateurs. I think you're underestimating how easy moving at normal team sports speeds it is when your legs are used to knocking out solid pace for far longer than a match lasts.

oddman

Original Poster:

2,409 posts

254 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
CLK-GTR said:
President Merkin said:
Tour cyclists are one cohort I would trust slightly less than an email from a NIgerian general.
However they do it, they're bloody fit.

VO2 max is the one metric that is reliably representative of being ultra fit. The records are dominated by cyclists and cross country skiers, with the odd long distance runner thrown in.
If we were having a discussion 25 years ago. Not many outside sports physiology would have a clue what VO2 max was. Then resting heart rate, a correlate of VO2 max, would probably be trotted out to support the argument that cyclists and cross country skiiers are the fittest athletes. It's establshed as a physiological measure (although its been around 100 years) it seems to be the 'argument winner' on who's the fittest. Even then although in populations VO2 max is a good predictor of performance and life expectancy, there are exceptions of athletes with relatively poor VO2 max who can outperform their numbers (tends to be in marathon plus distance competitions where mental resilience comes in). Athletes with similar physiological data will train, recover and perform differently

However VO2max is only one dimension of overall fitness. Other important components of fitness like strength, balance, mobility, coordination/skill, raw speed and mental toughness are disregarded. Alex Honnold occupies a much greater area of this multidimensional plot than a pro cyclist.

In the pissing contest of which sportsmen are fittest then, although I come from an aerobic/endurance background, its difficult to argue against boxing.


mcelliott

8,741 posts

183 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
President Merkin said:
Tour cyclists are one cohort I would trust slightly less than an email from a NIgerian general.
Doesn’t matter about drug taking, clean or doped they’re still amongst the fittest people in the world.

I did a Murph challenge competition a few years back and have never really done anything that quite matches that for all round fitness, and that’s someone who bicycle raced in France for many years