The Official Tottenham Hotspur thread [Vol 14]
Discussion
k that, send him to MU.carlo996 said:
TEKNOPUG said:
Time to come in Agent Poch.
They’re a total mess. Good to see they’ve kept up the revolving door policy 
So much dodginess around that club. Still no idea why the government/ Saudis stepped in. Whole thing stank.
dmulally said:
You have 100M from the Kane money to spend.
Someone's not been paying attention in Levynomics class. The 100M was actually 95M EUR which was just over 82M in sterling.Maddison 40M + Van de Ven 35M + Vicario 15M already blows that, before the old trick of signing players we already have in Kulu and Porro.
Better hope that Pink, Pearl Jam and Travis Scott sell out the stadium this summer.
President Merkin said:
Stat of the day - including caretakers, Chelsea's next manager will be their 24th since 2000 which is more than there have been Popes since 1722 & at least one of them was a decent keeper.
Take away the 7 years with Ranieri and Mourinho from 2000-2007 and it looks even more ridiculous.
dmulally said:
Sure, it's going to cost you £3bn and there is £1bn long term debt. So call it £4bn.
But you get to spend £600m on players and immediately transform the club into one that can challenge for all the trophies.
I feel like PiF missed a trick....
48k said:
Someone's not been paying attention in Levynomics class. The 100M was actually 95M EUR which was just over 82M in sterling.
Maddison 40M + Van de Ven 35M + Vicario 15M already blows that, before the old trick of signing players we already have in Kulu and Porro.
Better hope that Pink, Pearl Jam and Travis Scott sell out the stadium this summer.
Add in the very high probability that if we hadn't sold Kane, we'd have more than likely got top 4 earning us another £40-50m in CL money. Why did we sell him again?Maddison 40M + Van de Ven 35M + Vicario 15M already blows that, before the old trick of signing players we already have in Kulu and Porro.
Better hope that Pink, Pearl Jam and Travis Scott sell out the stadium this summer.
Guvernator said:
Add in the very high probability that if we hadn't sold Kane, we'd have more than likely got top 4 earning us another £40-50m in CL money. Why did we sell him again?
Does this have a whiff of the fairplay thing about it? Need to balance the books. if we let him leave on a free then we wouldn't be able to spend on new players without risking losing loads of money and the possibility of a points deduction. As it was Spurs ended up with 80m income that they could spend on new players.
If money were no object and I owned Spurs I would have kept him until his contract ran out. We would have finished fourth at least with champions league money.
Gassing Station | Football | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff