Why do planes take off down the centre line?

Why do planes take off down the centre line?

Author
Discussion

wolfracesonic

7,056 posts

128 months

Sunday 21st January
quotequote all
They’re not actually cat’s eyes but mini conveyor belts running in the direction the plane is going: if the pilot hits them all, as they’re trained to do, the plane receives additional thrust for take off.

AlexIT

1,497 posts

139 months

Monday 22nd January
quotequote all
wolfracesonic said:
They’re not actually cat’s eyes but mini conveyor belts running in the direction the plane is going: if the pilot hits them all, as they’re trained to do, the plane receives additional thrust for take off.
Do you also get extra coins if you put a combo together?

Boatbuoy

1,941 posts

163 months

Monday 22nd January
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The Trident airliner's nose wheel was offset so keeping to the middle of the runway ensured that the nose wheel didn't hit the lights. That wasn't the reason the nose wheel was offset but it was a consequence of the design.

Does that make the Trident the twin brother to the A-10?


Geneve

3,868 posts

220 months

Wednesday 24th January
quotequote all
I thought that the ANO (Air Navigation Order) says pilots should track to the rhs of a line feature wink

Eric Mc

122,108 posts

266 months

Wednesday 24th January
quotequote all
Boatbuoy said:
Does that make the Trident the twin brother to the A-10?

Kind of. The nosewheel offset was for similar reasons - basically they needed the space in the nose for bulky equipment. In the case of the A10 it's a sod-off gun. In the case of the Trident it was the black boxes for the autoland equipment.

dukeboy749r

2,720 posts

211 months

Saturday 27th January
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The Trident airliner's nose wheel was offset so keeping to the middle of the runway ensured that the nose wheel didn't hit the lights. That wasn't the reason the nose wheel was offset but it was a consequence of the design.

That’s one for the ‘pictures that make your teeth itch’ thread.

Eric Mc

122,108 posts

266 months

Saturday 27th January
quotequote all
You should have watched the entire Trident undercarriage retraction sequence.

Hard-Drive

4,098 posts

230 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The Trident airliner's nose wheel was offset so keeping to the middle of the runway ensured that the nose wheel didn't hit the lights. That wasn't the reason the nose wheel was offset but it was a consequence of the design.

Where is that please? My mum was a stewardess on BEA Tridents and I'd love to take her whilst she can still get up the air stairs! That said, she might not remember any of it, nothing to do with her very sprightly 82 years, more to do with the fact that from what she's said I think the cabin crew was usually p1ssed!

Eric Mc

122,108 posts

266 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
There are two Tridents on display and reasonably accessible. The one in the picture is at Manchester and there is another one at Duxford. A third example is preserved at the Science Museum outstation at Wroughton but that is not open to the public at the moment.

There is a cockpit section on display at the FAST Museum in Farnborough.

bitchstewie

Original Poster:

51,570 posts

211 months

Tuesday 30th April
quotequote all
Not really worth a new thread but I think the little noise Jerry lets out at the start of the video kind of sums it up yikes


Jasey_

4,913 posts

179 months

Tuesday 30th April
quotequote all
Sometimes there's not much choice.

Not sure I'd fancy this as a take off never mind a landing eek


14

2,117 posts

162 months

Tuesday 30th April
quotequote all
Jasey_ said:
Sometimes there's not much choice.

Not sure I'd fancy this as a take off never mind a landing eek

I’m not sure that flying for an approach to runway 7 right and landing on runway 33 is considered not much choice. That was a very dangerous landing.

Muddle238

3,913 posts

114 months

Tuesday 30th April
quotequote all
The centreline lights aren't always fitted to the exact centreline of the runway. Sometimes they're installed along one edge of the white centreline markings, giving a bit more leeway for pilots avoid the "dink dink dink dink" of running them over.

On my type, the distance between the nosewheels from memory is probably about a foot or just over (B737-800) which sounds a lot but when you're accelerating to about 170mph and have a gusting crosswind pushing against the tail, keeping the lights exactly between the two nosewheels can become a challenge. Often, I'll position slightly to the side of the lights, to avoid battering the nosewheel, although if the aircraft wanders back onto the lights in a strong crosswind then so be it.

5150

689 posts

256 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
14 said:
Jasey_ said:
Sometimes there's not much choice.

Not sure I'd fancy this as a take off never mind a landing eek

I’m not sure that flying for an approach to runway 7 right and landing on runway 33 is considered not much choice. That was a very dangerous landing.
From memory, that was a retirement flight at Rand airport, just south of Johannnesburg. Aircraft was on its final flight to the museum there for preservation.

wildoliver

8,797 posts

217 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
It's to save arguments over left and right hand drive countries/planes.

DaveTheRave87

2,095 posts

90 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
I got a microlight lesson for my birthday a few years ago.

Force of habit caused me to line up in the left hand "lane" of the runway, to which my instructor asked "are you expecting anything to be coming the the other way?"

MarkwG

4,868 posts

190 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Recall an incident at night, back in the '80s where I worked: a BAC1-11 lined up on the centreline lights, landed firmly with the left gear in the mud, before shimmying right back onto the runway taking quite a lot of mud with it: the runway didn't have centreline lights, only edge...