The Official Manchester United Thread (Vol 12)

The Official Manchester United Thread (Vol 12)

Author
Discussion

Forester1965

1,778 posts

4 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
mickk said:
Unless 115 items get accounted for.
Someone in the Middle East on the phone to the Government said:
We don't like what's happening with Man City. It would make us happier if it was stopped. Happy people don't cancel arms orders or stop military and intelligence cooperation
Someone in government to the Premier League said:
Erm, stop that thing against Man City. Make something up if you have to. Whatever. Just stop it.

LF5335

6,093 posts

44 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
mickk said:
LF5335 said:
City will win the title and next year and the year after and so on until Pep leaves
Unless 115 items get accounted for.
Not a chance. It’ll all go away quietly, as the knock on effect would be huge. Everton taking a hit doesn’t matter. Forest might go down because of it but that’s it. Every single trophy City have won would be officially tainted rather than the * we all apply to it now and call them cheats.

bstb3

4,127 posts

159 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
LF5335 said:
Not a chance. It’ll all go away quietly, as the knock on effect would be huge. Everton taking a hit doesn’t matter. Forest might go down because of it but that’s it. Every single trophy City have won would be officially tainted rather than the * we all apply to it now and call them cheats.
The cynic in me fears you are right, but I wonder why the other 19 would stand for it (or at least 18 of them if we discount sandcastle)? The PL is supposed to represent the interests of all it's member clubs and all of the other are massively disadvantaged (some more than others) by what has been alleged to have been going on. Surely they should, depending on the outcome, be standing up and walking out / breaking away if the PL do fumble this (assuming guilt)?

The bigger issue though is that the (alleged) cheating was to achieve a position more quickly than they should have, so ultimately the disadvantage would have happened anyway - which was allowed once state ownership wasn't blocked originally as it should have been. Unless this is rolled back any punishment is only delaying the inevitable in any case.

LF5335

6,093 posts

44 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
Whatever reasons are given will be paper thin and easily trashed. That won’t alter that City won’t be punished. There will come a time when City winning the PL every year will start to switch viewers off and the gravy train for all will dry up.

Look how hard Sky push that there’s a title race. There’s 10% of the season to go and it’s effectively over. It was over last year with 20% to go.

GTO-3R

7,521 posts

214 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
simon800 said:
Van De Ven is so rapid, it’s incredible! Absolute beast from a physical perspective. Havertz was clean through at one point and VdV ate up the yards
Which is exactly why our defence sits so deep leaving a huge hole in the middle of the pitch. Until we sort our defence out, no manager will succeed at United.

simon800

2,442 posts

108 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
So back to Ten Hag needing more players, because how could he possibly be expected to compete having spent only £400mn on a squad which regularly came 2nd or 3rd…..


LF5335

6,093 posts

44 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
simon800 said:
So back to Ten Hag needing more players, because how could he possibly be expected to compete having spent only £400mn on a squad which regularly came 2nd or 3rd…..
He’s also got rid of at least 2 keepers (3 if you include Butland), signed 2 ( has he played one of them?), signed a left back (permanently injured) a centre back (nearly always injured), resigned a former player (very injury prone), brought in and got rid of a loan LB, but still seems to prefer a combination of former manager’s players.

franki68

10,450 posts

222 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
simon800 said:
So back to Ten Hag needing more players, because how could he possibly be expected to compete having spent only £400mn on a squad which regularly came 2nd or 3rd…..
Regular ? In the post fergy era Two second place finishes and one third place before he arrived ,one fourth place so I’d say it was more regular for United not to finish top 4 .

LF5335

6,093 posts

44 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
I think the point is that ETH has spent £400m and the team hasn’t improved. Obviously some of that is necessary to plug the gaps with out of contract players leaving and others moving on. However, there’s no visible improvement. In fact there isn’t any improvement no matter how small. We get battered by the top 6 occasionally which didn’t happen previously. We can’t get a win away from home against them whereas we used to at least get something occasionally. We are losing / dropping points consistently at home too. The matches we win are a struggle and usually by no more than a single goal or require a last ditch goal to save us. We are unable to to hold onto a lead for more than 5 minutes in any game. We often have to come from behind. Are facing more shots than ever in our history and so on.

The above matters because it wouldn’t take much for us to be at the bottom end rather than somehow in the Top6.

simon800

2,442 posts

108 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
franki68 said:
Regular ? In the post fergy era Two second place finishes and one third place before he arrived ,one fourth place so I’d say it was more regular for United not to finish top 4 .
We finished 2nd or 3rd 3 times in the 5 seasons before Ten Hag's appointment. That seems pretty regular to me, perhaps I should have said "finished top 3 60% of the time in the half decade before his appointment".

simon800

2,442 posts

108 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
Ducker in The Telegraph reckons most our squad are up for sale, excluding Garnacho/Mainoo/Hojlund. He's genuinely not a BS merchant, is probably up there with The Athletic for credibility.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2024/04/29/ma...

Key snippets;

- Manchester United are prepared to listen to offers for the majority of their first team squad this summer apart from a clutch of rising stars, Telegraph Sport understands.

- Old Trafford’s new hierarchy are thought to be ready to adopt an ultra-flexible approach to this summer’s transfer window given their tight financial constraints and likely loss of Champions League revenues.

- United are believed to be prioritising the recruitment of a striker, central midfielder and right-sided centre-half this summer but need to raise money through sales to boost what is otherwise expected to be a very modest transfer budget.

- United would effectively be operating a “sell-to-buy” policy if the club missed out on Europe entirely, so restricted are their finances after a £555 million spend over the previous three summers and the limits imposed by the Premier League’s profit and sustainability rules.

- The likes of Kobbie Mainoo, Alejandro Garnacho and Rasmus Hojlund – around whom United hope to build a highly successful team in the years to come – will be strictly off limits to would-be suitors

- United could be willing to have conversations with interested parties, for example, over Rashford should any offers arrive that warrant serious discussion.

- Anthony Martial and defenders Raphael Varane and Brandon Williams are expected to leave as free agents at the end of the season and the huge wage savings there could free up room for a substantial investment in a new player.

- United are also waiting to discover whether the Saudi Pro League are ready to commit to another big summer of spending, which could open up a valuable market for older, high earning players such as Casemiro they may otherwise struggle to shift.

Goes on to say we'd sell Sancho (good), Greenwood (fair enough if it raises funds), Wan Bissaka (thank goodness), Lindelof (meh, don't mind him ), Eriksen (good) and Donny (thank fk)

Interestingly he also says Jamal Musiala could be on the market, unfortunately due to finances we wouldn't be in for him but what a player every time I've seen him play. Wonder where he ends up, and why Bayern would sell him...


Edited by simon800 on Monday 29th April 16:43

Forester1965

1,778 posts

4 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
We should hold our noses and keep Greenwood. Makes no sense spending all that money for someone else to benefit.

RoadRunner220

962 posts

194 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
simon800 said:
an article with stuff in it
Regarding transfers, what you've pulled out from that article is basically the same approach I would take if I was in charge, and I bet most on here would say similar.

Which does make me wonder how much truth there is in it and how much is just a sensible blueprint that most fans will click(bait) on and agree with.

simon800

2,442 posts

108 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
RoadRunner220 said:
Regarding transfers, what you've pulled out from that article is basically the same approach I would take if I was in charge, and I bet most on here would say similar.

Which does make me wonder how much truth there is in it and how much is just a sensible blueprint that most fans will click(bait) on and agree with.
Yep I can get on board with that view!

The only thing that made me give any credence to this is James Ducker is a "proper" journo who has sources etc, as opposed to it being an article in The Sun or the Daily Star. Maybe I'm just living in hope, as it all seems eminently sensible!

bstb3

4,127 posts

159 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
Well we'll need to get it sorted before this new spending cap comes in (depending how it ends up). Certainly getting a better wage control is very important, so I've no real objection to letting the highest earners go unless they are really producing the goods.

There's only a certain amount of time we have between the past Glazers 'Spending Crap' era and the upcoming 'Spending Cap' era, so we'd best make the most of it.

MiniMan64

16,959 posts

191 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
Forester1965 said:
We should hold our noses and keep Greenwood. Makes no sense spending all that money for someone else to benefit.
Yeah sorry, absolutely no thanks. If he’d held his hands up, recognised what he’d done and tried to make a change then maybe but as it is, nope.

Not that my opinion matters.

Frimley111R

15,709 posts

235 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
"..... if the club missed out on Europe entirely...."

Which we will.

RoadRunner220

962 posts

194 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
simon800 said:
Maybe I'm just living in hope, as it all seems eminently sensible!
You're not the only one, I too hope the article is entirely true.

Just on Brandon Williams seeing as he was mentioned in the article. What I would like to see us as a club do more of is being more ruthless with our youth players. Too many times in recent years you see a youth player come through, get a few appearances, look half decent, and then they just don't get the game time and fade into obscurity. It's like we don't want to sell them on 'just in case' but then we don't play them and they just leave on a free anyway.

What I want to see us do is, if we think they aren't going to get the game time, just sell them, cash in, add in a sell on clause and get rid.

City have done this well recently, Cole Palmer being the latest. Yes he's turned out to be quite a player, but he wasn't going to get game time at City, and he had what, two starts ?, and they got £40m for him, and will get more because of sell on clauses.

And it will help a lot with FFP

RoadRunner220

962 posts

194 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
"..... if the club missed out on Europe entirely...."

Which we will.
If we spend a second season out of the Champions League, ie, if we don't get back in at the end of next season, something like our £90m a year kit deal drops by a third, so that would be another £30m hit to the coffers.

No idea if there is a clause about missing out on Europe entirely.

Frimley111R

15,709 posts

235 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
Jesus! Squad motivation must be high with news that most of them are up for sale!!!!