EVs... no one wants them!

EVs... no one wants them!

Author
Discussion

HTP99

22,639 posts

141 months

Sunday 28th April
quotequote all
lord trumpton said:
So just returning the the thread theme

What is the current stance of the trade and EVs?

Do they not want to bid on/buy them?

If they do accept as a px are they priced super low?
We will take them as a PX but will bid low, we won't just buy them for stock though, sister branch sold their ZOE ex courtesy car recently and lost £4k on it.

I've a fair few ZOE customers in my diary who are coming up in the next few months to the end of their PCP's, all are in negative to the tune of circa £5k!

tamore

7,045 posts

285 months

Sunday 28th April
quotequote all
so you've got these machines, that really don't go wrong (despite the silly propaganda), with loads coming onto the market in tiptop nick, less than half the price of what it was new, with loads of cheaper models coming on to the market. consumers confused? very much yes.

hiatus only.

Wagonwheel555

821 posts

57 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
We are looking to dip our toes into the EV world, albeit on a lease because I can just give it back at the end without worrying about selling it on etc.

We have another ICE car so the EV would just be for commuting and around town stuff, anything longer journey would be in the ICE car.


Evanivitch

20,261 posts

123 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
Wagonwheel555 said:
We are looking to dip our toes into the EV world, albeit on a lease because I can just give it back at the end without worrying about selling it on etc.

We have another ICE car so the EV would just be for commuting and around town stuff, anything longer journey would be in the ICE car.
Depends what EV you get. You'll probably fine the EV better for more than just around town.

nickfrog

21,303 posts

218 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
sturge7878 said:
No change from the thread title where I am tbh. Other opinions may vary…
Are you of the opinion that no one wants them?

T_S_M

741 posts

184 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
HTP99 said:
lord trumpton said:
So just returning the the thread theme

What is the current stance of the trade and EVs?

Do they not want to bid on/buy them?

If they do accept as a px are they priced super low?
We will take them as a PX but will bid low, we won't just buy them for stock though, sister branch sold their ZOE ex courtesy car recently and lost £4k on it.

I've a fair few ZOE customers in my diary who are coming up in the next few months to the end of their PCP's, all are in negative to the tune of circa £5k!
So who absorbs those costs? Being on a PCP, the negative equity is irrelevant as they can just give it back at the end of the term.

Are the manufacturers taking a massive loss on all of them, or the finance companies?

loudlashadjuster

5,184 posts

185 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
T_S_M said:
So who absorbs those costs? Being on a PCP, the negative equity is irrelevant as they can just give it back at the end of the term.

Are the manufacturers taking a massive loss on all of them, or the finance companies?
Finance company. It’s their risk when they set the GMFV.

T_S_M

741 posts

184 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
loudlashadjuster said:
T_S_M said:
So who absorbs those costs? Being on a PCP, the negative equity is irrelevant as they can just give it back at the end of the term.

Are the manufacturers taking a massive loss on all of them, or the finance companies?
Finance company. It’s their risk when they set the GMFV.
Surely the finance companies must be taking a massive hit with all these EV's about to come off lease/PCP and being worth thousands/tens of thousands less than they thought they would?

LivLL

10,909 posts

198 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
Depends, in many cases the finance company is part of the manufacturers business.

If you have someone paying monthlies to cover the depreciation and have a list price that’s bears no relation to the cost of making the car, there are still healthy volume profits to be made.

If the cars are reliable during warranty and not so much out of warranty there’s also parts and repair profit to gather.

It’s why I don’t understand Tesla’s PCP rates.

Edited by LivLL on Monday 29th April 11:01

740EVTORQUES

498 posts

2 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
sturge7878 said:
lord trumpton said:
So just returning the the thread theme

What is the current stance of the trade and EVs?

Do they not want to bid on/buy them?

If they do accept as a px are they priced super low?
No change from the thread title where I am tbh. Other opinions may vary…
You can't have an opinion about facts OP (unless your name is Donald Trump that is). Your thread title was 'EV's...no one wants them!' (the use of both ellipsis and exclamation being the full house bingo of deliberate bad faith discussion by the way.)

The fact is that lots of people do want EV's. Not as many as the Government might want, hence both carrot and stick incentives, but it's a plain fact that unless the 15.2% of UK new car buyers who bought Ev's in March were doing so against their will then lots of people DO want EV's.




T_S_M

741 posts

184 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
LivLL said:
Depends, in many cases the finance company is part of the manufacturers business.

If you have someone paying monthlies to cover the depreciation and have a list price that’s bears no relation to the cost of naming the car, there are still healthy volume profits to be made.

If the cars are reliable during warranty and not so much out of warranty there’s also parts and repair profit to gather.

It’s why I don’t understand Tesla’s PCP rates.
In my case for example, I bought a 3-year old Audi E-tron on on an 18-month PCP term. Cash price was £26k from Audi and the GFV is £23k after 18-months. Webuyanycar value for it is £17k now after only 6 months, so it's got another 12 months worth of depreciation yet. Probably going to be near £10k in negative equity by the end of it! Not my problem but certainly will be for Audi/VWFS if there a number of people in the same situation.

That's not including the £2.5k finance contribution and wall charger they threw in as part of the deal!

ChocolateFrog

25,674 posts

174 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
Own up. There's definitely a few on here signed up.


BricktopST205

1,064 posts

135 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
740EVTORQUES said:
You can't have an opinion about facts OP (unless your name is Donald Trump that is). Your thread title was 'EV's...no one wants them!' (the use of both ellipsis and exclamation being the full house bingo of deliberate bad faith discussion by the way.)

The fact is that lots of people do want EV's. Not as many as the Government might want, hence both carrot and stick incentives, but it's a plain fact that unless the 15.2% of UK new car buyers who bought Ev's in March were doing so against their will then lots of people DO want EV's.
How much of them were doing it purely for tax reasons?

BlackPorker

379 posts

176 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
The latest figures from CAP HPI suggest most EVs are still significantly underperforming against ICE:
https://cardealermagazine.co.uk/publish/used-car-p...

Edited by BlackPorker on Monday 29th April 11:25

tamore

7,045 posts

285 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
BricktopST205 said:
How much of them were doing it purely for tax reasons?
so people will take a distinctly inferior product as they can get a tax break on it?

Unreal

3,551 posts

26 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
tamore said:
BricktopST205 said:
How much of them were doing it purely for tax reasons?
so people will take a distinctly inferior product as they can get a tax break on it?
You might equally ask why a distinctly superior product would need a tax break.

TheRainMaker

6,370 posts

243 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
tamore said:
BricktopST205 said:
How much of them were doing it purely for tax reasons?
so people will take a distinctly inferior product as they can get a tax break on it?
100% yes, it happened with Diesel.



SWoll

18,557 posts

259 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
tamore said:
BricktopST205 said:
How much of them were doing it purely for tax reasons?
so people will take a distinctly inferior product as they can get a tax break on it?
Plenty have signed up to EV's despite not having a use case or setup that suits one solely for the tax break yes. You'll find numerous posters on this forum that have gone back to iCE for that very reason.

When the monthly BIK tax difference between a 320d and Model 3 RWD for someone on £50k is £400+ a month that should come as no surprise?

tamore

7,045 posts

285 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
Unreal said:
tamore said:
BricktopST205 said:
How much of them were doing it purely for tax reasons?
so people will take a distinctly inferior product as they can get a tax break on it?
You might equally ask why a distinctly superior product would need a tax break.
superior in what sense? handling on the raggedy edge? soul? aural pleasure? or doing less damage to the environment? cheaper to run? more relaxing? more convenient?

tamore

7,045 posts

285 months

Monday 29th April
quotequote all
TheRainMaker said:
100% yes, it happened with Diesel.
i need that explaining. must be 200 posts with people reiterating their diesel can bang out 700 miles while they do their regular LEJOG trips in one hit wink

Edited by tamore on Monday 29th April 12:31