RE: Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) | PH Used Buying Guide

RE: Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) | PH Used Buying Guide

Sunday 25th September 2022

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) | PH Used Buying Guide

The SL may not be very Sport Leicht anymore, but it is a brilliant Benz - here's how to get a good one


Key considerations

• Available for £14,000 (really!)
• 3.5-litre NA V6 or 3.0-litre twin-turbo V6, rear-wheel drive
• Basic SL 350 is more than quick enough in the real world
• Nicely understated and mechanically strong
• Maybe not as ‘special’ as some previous SLs
• … but still a comfortable, classy and cheap two-seat tourer

Today’s buying guide is on the Mercedes-Benz R231 SL two-seater sports that was on sale between 2012 and 2020. The R231 is only the sixth-generation SL, amazing really when you consider that it’s been in Mercedes brochures since the early 1950s.

Now, as a powerfully built PH type you might be expecting us to concentrate on the 4.7 V8-powered SL500 or the twin-turbo 5.5 SL 63 AMG. Fine machines to be sure, but actually we’re going to focus on what we reckon is the unsung hero of the R231 range, the entry-level SL 350 that launched in 2012, or the SL 400 as it became in 2014.

Why? Well, for a start, an SL of any stripe, ‘basic’ or range-topper, is going to be a highly desirable motor. SLs have traditionally set the standard in a corner of the market that we might, in a moment of verbal diarrhoea, call relaxed open-topped sporting luxury. Then there’s the performance, which in truth is less relaxed than you might think. The 350’s maximum power of 302hp might seem a bit measly on the page, but when it’s combined with a nice spread of torque, a smooth 7-speed transmission and a new aluminium body with magnesium roof frames that trimmed 140kg off the R230’s weight, it’s surprising how smartly you’ll be moving down the road in one of these. Even the entry-level SL 350 is a five-second 0-62mph car.

The final reason for zoning in on the 350? The prices that you’ll pay for this generous package of performance, luxury and heritage. We saw a 115,000-mile 350 with no mention of any damage repairs at two quid under £14,000. That was exceptionally cheap and would obviously need closer investigation, but even if we ignore that one there’s no shortage of 350s on the used market from £16,000, which seems like excellent value for a car that was over £72,000 new in 2012.

In mid-2013 the SL 350 and 500 became available with fancier AMG Sport trim, a clever electric glass sunroof, bigger brakes and Park Assist. A year later the SL 350 was superseded at the bottom of the SL range by the SL400 which was powered by a smaller (3.0 litre) but twin-IHI-turbocharged V6 offering 328hp and 354lb ft. Despite carrying an extra 50kg or so, the new SL 400 was 0.7sec quicker over the 0-62mph run and not much less economical. Another refresh in spring 2016 powered the 3.0 turbo engine up to 362hp and brought a nine-speed 9G-Tronic gearbox, new safety gear, 18-inch wheels and Apple CarPlay.

Turns out that the R231 we’re looking at here was the last iteration of the classic SL because the new for 2021 R232 SL was shuffled across into the AMG fold. Maybe it was our ham-fisted use of the overwrought M-B UK website (wouldn’t be the first time) but we couldn’t find any of these AMG SLs for sale anywhere in the UK dealership network at the time of writing (September 2022), so in a way you could say that the R231 remains the current model SL, in the UK at least.

Fourteen, or even sixteen, grand for a current model Mercedes SL with a superb drivetrain and a packed specification? That’s bonkers, isn’t it? What’s the catch? You tell us. Oh, we’re supposed to be telling you aren’t we. All right, let’s try and find out if there are any reasons why you shouldn’t be living your best SL-Class life at used C-Class prices. Hurrah for depreciation!

SPECIFICATION | MERCEDES-BENZ SL 350/400 (2012-14/2014-16/2016-20)

Engine: 3,498cc/2,996cc turbo V6 24v petrol
Transmission: 7-speed automatic (9-speed after 2016), rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 302@6,500rpm/328@5,250-6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 273@3,500-5,250rpm/354@1,600-4,000rpm
0-62mph (secs): 5.9/5.2
Top speed (mph): 155
Weight (kg): 1,685/1,730
MPG (official combined): 41.5/38.7
CO2 (g/km): 159/172
Wheels (in): 17
Tyres: 255/45
On sale: 2012-2014 / 2014-2020
Price new: £72,495 (SL 350)
Price now: from £14,000

Note for reference: car weight and power data are hard to pin down with absolute certainty. For consistency, we use the same source for all our guides. We hope the data we use is right more often than it’s wrong. Our advice is to treat it as relative rather than definitive.


ENGINE & GEARBOX

When there’s a V8 to be had in any car range there’s a tendency to ignore any ‘lesser’ six-cylinder engines that might be sitting in the shadows. That’s always been a mistakenly short-sighted view when it comes to Mercedes, whose track record of delivering silky sixes has historically been second to none.

The R231’s first non-turbo 3.5 litre M276 V6 was a lovely piece of kit, refined to the core and perfectly suited to a life of cruising. With direct injection came the potential for carbon build-up, but the M276 was quite resistant to it. Generically, high-pressure fuel pumps can give trouble on DI engines, but the HPFP fitted to the SL wasn’t particularly known for failing, and if it did go it would usually do so gradually over months rather than suddenly, and generally not below 80,000 miles. The symptoms were longer cranking times, hesitation, rough idling and power loss.

The official mpg figure for the SL 350 was over 40mpg and regular returns in the mid-30s were perfectly attainable. Overall the M276 has been a reliable and strong unit in both 3.5 NA and 3.0 turbo iterations. It was timed by chain. Some pre-2014 engines did suffer from tensioner issues causing rattling, check engine lights and fault codes, but M-B put out improved parts after that date. Many of the weak tensioners were replaced under warranty so with luck it should be safe to buy early cars.

Both the seven- and nine-speed transmissions fitted to the SL 350/400 were smooth and efficient. Paddle operation wasn’t lightning-fast but only low-speed downshifts were vaguely noticeable. There was a problem with some 7-speed boxes locking themselves in Park, the fix for which was nothing short of a new gear selector. The paperwork may show it’s been replaced, or that there’s no sign of any replacement. Either way, life going forward should be sweet.

SL servicing was straightforward enough, operating on a 12-month/10k alternation between major and minor. It wasn’t as dear as you might have feared either, minors at the official dealer coming in at under £300. Two-yearly majors are somewhat more, obviously. If you were having the plugs changed (it was advisable to do that every four years to minimise the chance of them seizing in the heads) and having fresh gearbox oil and brake fluid put in, the cost could drift into four figures. Knocking one or two of those items off the worklist might get the bill down to under £500 if you’re lucky. Non-dealer specialists would typically charge two-thirds of the dealer’s quote.

Dying spark plugs and coils are more or less a normal part of modern motoring. Non-turbo engines tend not to burn through their ignition components as quickly as turbocharged ones, which was another tick for the 3.5 NA engine. Timing was by chain rather than belt, so no worries there.

CHASSIS

As mentioned earlier, the R231’s aluminium/magnesium body chopped a hefty 140kg off the previous SL’s weight and boosted rigidity by 20 per cent, but most of it not all of that weight saving was put back on in the form of new safety systems and ‘toys’, so there wasn’t much difference between the handling of new and old SLs. Having said that, the R231 felt lighter on its feet than the 1.7-tonne weight suggested, and the braking was very good. The response of the variable-ratio electromechanical steering was improved on the R231, and it felt great at lower speeds, but the sense of detachment at higher speeds confirmed that the SL was still more boulevardier than bolide.

When looking at cars to buy, don’t get carried away into thinking that you have to have big wheels on an SL. All they’ll do is add an unwanted sharp edge to the ride quality. Be comfortable in your own skin and resist the temptation to go large. If you feel you really need a knobbly ride, an SL with the AMG Sports package gives you a lowered ride height courtesy of stiffer springs.

Compared to the preceding gen-five R230, the R231 had wider tracks and more aluminium in its multi-link all-round suspension componentry. It also had torque vectoring and adaptive damping. The two modes were Comfort and Sport. New SL buyers could specify the ‘Magic Body Control’ version of Benz’s long-developed Active Body Control, an electronically controlled hydropneumatic suspension system which packaged up ride height adjustment and self-levelling with the suppression of body roll. On later models there was the option of ‘Active Curve Tilt’ that positively leant the car into corners, motorcycle-style. ABC gave you a best of both worlds mix of pliant ride with minimal roll but used buyers might think that the high cost of repairing it when it goes wrong makes it a less desirable thing to find on an SL.

A very small number of SLs were recalled in early 2017 to rectify a fault that could lead to power steering failure. Another recall was issued on April 2019-built cars for a rear suspension problem. Odd cars have been brought into dealerships for the replacement of front suspension arms that had a bush issue.

BODYWORK

Any convertible you’re thinking of buying needs a good powerhosing to make sure it doesn’t let the water in, and the R231’s Vario roof was no exception. Folding metal roofs generally have an inglorious reputation, and the Merc was not immune to jamming – engaging the latches for the roof/boot space divider could be difficult – but problems like that were much less common on the SL than they were on other roof-folders. Deploying it was a 20-second operation that could only be carried out on the pre-2016 SL when it was stationary. On cars built after that you could operate it at speeds of up to 25mph without having to fiddle with the divider.

The extras list included ‘Magic Sky Control’ in the panoramic glass roof, an £1,800 option using electro-reactive particles to give you the instant ability to switch from transparent to opaque, a lovely touch. Another piece of ‘magic’ naming that was perhaps not as grown-up sounding as a typical SL owner might like was ‘Magic Vision Control’. This was a wiper system which fed heated screenwash water through holes in the wiper blades to minimise any interruption to your visibility, and which operated differently according to the season and whether the roof was up or down, but it was a cute and effective gizmo. A reversing camera was a cost option.

INTERIOR

Every SL came with widely adjustable heated leather seats, digital radio, satnav, parking sensors and dual-zone climate control – pretty much all you need for an easy life.

The quality of the R231’s interior was superior to its predecessors, but you might think there’s some similarity between the R231’s switchgear and knobbery and that of lesser Benzes of the same era. You’d be right there because a lot of it is shared with those common or garden cars. That’s OK though because in the SL it was all sitting in a beautifully assembled environment of high-quality leather, metal and glass, while you as the human were luxuriating in a space that was airy in every dimension: height, width and depth. In fact, it was the most spacious car in the class for front-seat passengers. No car seat is ever going to be perfect for everyone, but the seats in an R231 got closer to it than most. Visibility was excellent.

The sacrifice for all that front-compartment room was no room for rear seats, but let’s be honest, what would you rather have, lots of room all the time or less room all the time to allow for an eventuality that might never happen? Exactly. The SL design also allowed for the provision of a lockable box behind the passenger seat, another really useful feature.

There was good space under the composite bootlid too, even when the roof was folded away. Hands Free Access for opening the boot by a foot wave was a neat option. The boot reflected the SL’s suitability for two-up touring, holding a decent 364 litres of cargo even when the roof was in the down position.  That was 129 litres up on the previous SL and enough for two golf bags. Space rose to around 500 litres with the roof up.

Top-down driving was at least as refined and comfortable as top-up, especially with the optional Airscarf neck heater and electronic wind deflector that most new buyers specced. Life was even better if you had the Bang & Olufsen stereo option, although the standard setup was excellent thanks to a clever ‘Frontbass’ design which moved the front bass speakers from the doors to special structures in the footwells to create resonance chambers. A batch of 2014 SLs built-in spring 2014 were recalled for faulty airbags.

PH VERDICT

Comfortable, classy and cheap. You don’t often see those three adjectives together in a car review, but they surely apply to the R231 Mercedes SL. It’s easy to forget just what a standard-bearer the SL has been over such a long period in the world of two-seater sports cars, and the R321 was a noticeable improvement over the R230 in terms of quality.

A Porsche 911 Cabriolet would be one open-air rival for an SL350/400, and it would be a sharper driving car with nominal rear seats, but try finding one of them at the mid-teens money that will snag one of these Mercs. Otherwise it’s a 6 Series BMW or Maserati Gran Cabrio from the period. Neither of those would provide a superior driving experience.

Prices at the cheap end of the R231 market are heavily mileage dependent. As noted in the Overview you can find a 2012 115,000-mile 350 at £14k, but next door to it in the classifieds you might well see a 50,000-mile car from the same year for £19k. The most affordable example on PH classifieds at the time of writing was this 45,000-mile SL 350 from 2013 with the AMG Sport upgrades that came in that year and the panoramic glass sunroof. It’s cheap at £17,494 because it’s Cat S repaired. For £1,500 more there’s this fully serviced pre-AMG 2013 car with the desirable Airscarf fitted, plus Active Park Assist which does the steering for you. 

The cheapest 328hp SL 400 was this 58,000-mile 2015 car in white with red leather at £25,995. You could bag a 362hp 9-speed 400 for under £30k in the shape of this 80,000 mile 2018 car. Throw another £2k into the pot and you’ll be able to halve that mileage in this 2016 car


See every used SL (R231) for sale

Author
Discussion

Venisonpie

Original Poster:

3,331 posts

84 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
An R231 is likely my next car in tune with being over 50 and not wanting to tear about anymore. A 400 is probably all that's needed but a 500 would just be that bit better.

Nicolas Lazar

140 posts

29 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
Perfect car for a couple for drifting from one Relais & Châteaux to the next.

Milemuncher

524 posts

117 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
Nicolas Lazar said:
Perfect car for a couple for drifting from one Relais & Châteaux to the next.
Exactly our experience…before we had a child!

Amazing how much luggage and wine you can fit in too, if you’re judicious with your packing…

Koolkat969

988 posts

101 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
I like that a lot. That's a lot of car for the money!

Tall_Blk

376 posts

193 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
A week of Mercedes Benz cars. Didn’t realise these have become so affordable.if only I’m in the market for one

Mysstree

471 posts

48 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
Hard to find one in something that is not fifty shades of boring, blue being maybe the most available. Maybe that defines the stereotypical buyer, ageing beige types with a beard (including the women), partial to smoking a pipe (including the women) and the slight whiff of pee from the early signs of incontinence.

GT3hopeful

248 posts

119 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
I have had 2 SL500s a 2015 and a 2017. Both were great touring cars quiet and smooth even with roof down - the auto gearbox on later model was smoother and v8 burble better.
They were heavily discounted when new with about 28% off list. Reasons I didn’t keep were:-
1. I hated the plastic fake air intakes on the front wings
2. 2017 car grounded engine/auto box on steep slopes
3. interior was not special enough
4. Side view of car always looked a bit awkward to my eyes

Would still take this model over the newly launched ludicrously priced new SL (five years ago I paid £66k for fully specced new SL500 so don’t think I could ever consider new SL at over twice that price ( unless you only want a puny 2.0 litre for bargain £100k!)

Edited by GT3hopeful on Sunday 25th September 09:29

sixor8

6,341 posts

270 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
The V6 3.5 is presumable the same engine as in the SLK. Which although probably not the same in terms of refinement, is lighter and so a tad faster. smile

swisstoni

17,201 posts

281 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
Mysstree said:
Hard to find one in something that is not fifty shades of boring, blue being maybe the most available. Maybe that defines the stereotypical buyer, ageing beige types with a beard (including the women), partial to smoking a pipe (including the women) and the slight whiff of pee from the early signs of incontinence.
Must feel better after dropping off all those well-worn cliches.

Harrison Bergeron

5,444 posts

224 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
Are they all this rattly thought?

It seems like every time the driver in this video lifts off something rattles.

Ed Straker

221 posts

145 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
I've had 3 of these but all V8's because....well why wouldn't you?!
I'd take a 4th in a heartbeat.
A facelift 500 with ventilated seats, coil spring suspension and a strong (non-monochrome) colour and contrasting interior is the way to go.
If I could find a similarly specified LC500 I'd take that too.
There's really nothing else that compares.

Pusikurac

121 posts

42 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
UK prices... I do not get it. How can those be at least half price comparing to EU? You have it good...

shambolic

2,146 posts

169 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
Mysstree said:
Hard to find one in something that is not fifty shades of boring, blue being maybe the most available. Maybe that defines the stereotypical buyer, ageing beige types with a beard (including the women), partial to smoking a pipe (including the women) and the slight whiff of pee from the early signs of incontinence.
You are a ray of sunshine aren’t you. With your stereotype of people.

P. ONeill

1,455 posts

54 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
A lot of car for the money, if I had room I’d have one. Always been a fan of these, though you will likely be paying closer to £20k for a good one.

Dog Star

16,187 posts

170 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
shambolic said:
Mysstree said:
Hard to find one in something that is not fifty shades of boring, blue being maybe the most available. Maybe that defines the stereotypical buyer, ageing beige types with a beard (including the women), partial to smoking a pipe (including the women) and the slight whiff of pee from the early signs of incontinence.
You are a ray of sunshine aren’t you. With your stereotype of people.
And as usual there’s no garage on the profile.

Reminds me of when I bought a new Alfa Spider - bloke at work was giving it all the hairdressers car crap. I asked him what he drove: a Nova.

KPB1973

924 posts

101 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
Of my many motoring mistakes, selling my SL63 R231 just as we went into lockdown is by far my biggest.

As a zero-notice freelancer I bottled having £33k tied up in a car when things were so uncertain economically, only to find that like for like cars were £10k more 6 months later.

As for the car itself...what a machine...it felt every one of the £130k it had cost new.

My only gripe was wet weather grip (590ft lbs in the 'lesser' non-performance pack model saw to that) and not having the HK audio. Apparently the body in white was designed with acoustics in mind but the standard fit stereo was awful.

No issues in my ownership, inc the much more robust ABC suspension of this gen. Just be careful of the state of the discs on the top end AMG models. Cheap they ain't!

Mr Harris' reviews of these, alongside JayEmms more recent one, are a good indicator of what the top end of the R321 range is capable of.

I'd happily have another R231, but having sampled the top of the tree, I don't think a lesser model would feel the same.

McRors

290 posts

58 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
Now, I’m very tempted by these or an SLK 350. While I’ve the money to buy either (up to 20k) I’m scared witless of the running costs and possible borkage bills of the more complex SL. Question is, am I deluding myself and they’ll be about the same? Thoughts appreciated.

GTRene

16,840 posts

226 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
Pusikurac said:
UK prices... I do not get it. How can those be at least half price comparing to EU? You have it good...
indeed, always so yealous-ish about those low prices a lot of lovely cars go in the UK, most are indeed about double that (sma-ish cars) in euro's on this side in Europa like say here in the Netherlands.

cerb4.5lee

31,065 posts

182 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
Reading the article has got me really wanting one of these. A lot of car for the money for sure.

GTRene

16,840 posts

226 months

Sunday 25th September 2022
quotequote all
KPB1973 said:
Of my many motoring mistakes, selling my SL63 R231 just as we went into lockdown is by far my biggest.

As a zero-notice freelancer I bottled having £33k tied up in a car when things were so uncertain economically, only to find that like for like cars were £10k more 6 months later.

As for the car itself...what a machine...it felt every one of the £130k it had cost new.

My only gripe was wet weather grip (590ft lbs in the 'lesser' non-performance pack model saw to that) and not having the HK audio. Apparently the body in white was designed with acoustics in mind but the standard fit stereo was awful.

No issues in my ownership, inc the much more robust ABC suspension of this gen. Just be careful of the state of the discs on the top end AMG models. Cheap they ain't!

Mr Harris' reviews of these, alongside JayEmms more recent one, are a good indicator of what the top end of the R321 range is capable of.

I'd happily have another R231, but having sampled the top of the tree, I don't think a lesser model would feel the same.
ah yes, crazy times indeed when prices of a lot cars went high, a lot almost new cars with say normally at least 5-7 years depreciation to go, went up after being only 2 years old, like say the cars I looked at the AMG GTR now they finally go down, but still not to the prices as in 2019- early2020.

btw, if you like these cars, maybe its time for a 'step up' to your SL63 R231 maybe you could go for a nice AMG GTC (cabriolet) more drivers car with rear steering ala GTR and a nice look, even from the side, also a nice folding softtop.