I never knew it was so hard to get a mortgage nowadays
I never knew it was so hard to get a mortgage nowadays
Author
Discussion

andyquantum

Original Poster:

13,204 posts

230 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
Just gave the current mortgage lender a ring to talk figures as I'd seen a house I was kind of interested in buying. It's got a lot more room than the current one for important car repairs and toys etc. Obviously I know it's not the best time for buying and selling.

As it's early days I just wanted to talk through some rough figures and see what the monthly payments would be like

I'm not talking big bucks house value, just into 3 figures. I've owned mine for about 3 years, and there's not a lot of difference between the two houses, maybe £15k against me. Mortgage company happy to lend the money, and a fair bit more if I needed it, borrowing not a problem.

Based on the value of the new house, vs writing the old policy they basically wanted £25k deposit! There's only one scheme they can do, and it's a tracker. Currently that'd be 7.something% - they add 2.2% onto BoE rate, which is more likely to go up than down

fk that!!! I'm staying put

anonymous-user

80 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
Can you not just port (move) your existing mortgage to the new property, most lenders allow this, then top up the small difference in price with another rate from their current range? This is assuming your current rate is half-decent.

Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 31st July 17:12

215cu

2,956 posts

236 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
andyquantum said:
Just gave the current mortgage lender a ring to talk figures as I'd seen a house I was kind of interested in buying. It's got a lot more room than the current one for important car repairs and toys etc. Obviously I know it's not the best time for buying and selling.

As it's early days I just wanted to talk through some rough figures and see what the monthly payments would be like

I'm not talking big bucks house value, just into 3 figures. I've owned mine for about 3 years, and there's not a lot of difference between the two houses, maybe £15k against me. Mortgage company happy to lend the money, and a fair bit more if I needed it, borrowing not a problem.

Based on the value of the new house, vs writing the old policy they basically wanted £25k deposit! There's only one scheme they can do, and it's a tracker. Currently that'd be 7.something% - they add 2.2% onto BoE rate, which is more likely to go up than down

fk that!!! I'm staying put
Welcome to the world of finance pre-1997 when reality really bites hard.

andyquantum

Original Poster:

13,204 posts

230 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
yellowbentines said:
Can you not just port (move) your existing mortgage to the new property, most lenders allow this, then top up the small difference in price with another rate from their current range? This is assuming your current rate is half-decent.

Edited by yellowbentines on Thursday 31st July 17:12
It was laughable, could almost hear the desperation in the womans voice. Apparently they used to be able to do funky stuff with the figures, now they cant. Couldnt even go with fixed rate either (which is what I'm on til early 2010), they're not offering it!

anonymous-user

80 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
andyquantum said:
yellowbentines said:
Can you not just port (move) your existing mortgage to the new property, most lenders allow this, then top up the small difference in price with another rate from their current range? This is assuming your current rate is half-decent.

Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 31st July 17:12
It was laughable, could almost hear the desperation in the womans voice. Apparently they used to be able to do funky stuff with the figures, now they cant. Couldnt even go with fixed rate either (which is what I'm on til early 2010), they're not offering it!
I'd double check, if you have your old mortgage offer have a look and there's usually a section headed 'what happens if i move house' or 'portability' or similar, which will let you know if you can move the mortgage to another house. If you are on a fixed you'll most likely want to keep it and if you can't keep it there'll more than likely be penalties to get out of it to set up something new.

scotal

8,751 posts

305 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
andyquantum said:
Just gave the current mortgage lender a ring to talk figures as I'd seen a house I was kind of interested in buying. It's got a lot more room than the current one for important car repairs and toys etc. Obviously I know it's not the best time for buying and selling.

As it's early days I just wanted to talk through some rough figures and see what the monthly payments would be like

I'm not talking big bucks house value, just into 3 figures. I've owned mine for about 3 years, and there's not a lot of difference between the two houses, maybe £15k against me. Mortgage company happy to lend the money, and a fair bit more if I needed it, borrowing not a problem.

Based on the value of the new house, vs writing the old policy they basically wanted £25k deposit! There's only one scheme they can do, and it's a tracker. Currently that'd be 7.something% - they add 2.2% onto BoE rate, which is more likely to go up than down

fk that!!! I'm staying put
Or alternatively you could run through things with a broker to see what is available to you away from your lender. Depends how much you want to move really.

Actually off that, you're tied in until 2010 so moving would cost you an ERC.
.... like YB says check for portability......



Edited by scotal on Thursday 31st July 17:21

V8mate

45,899 posts

215 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
andyquantum said:
I'm not talking big bucks house value, just into 3 figures.
You're going to spend over a hundred a quid on a house? Are you mad? There's a credit crunch, don't you know!?

smile

anonymous-user

80 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
V8mate said:
andyquantum said:
I'm not talking big bucks house value, just into 3 figures.
You're going to spend over a hundred a quid on a house? Are you mad? There's a credit crunch, don't you know!?

smile
I was thinking exactly the same thing. Must be up't North. Down here in the South you have to pay 6 figure amounts biggrin

jessica

6,321 posts

278 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
Go and find a repitable financial advisor. That is what we did. We even had a choice of lenders and mortgage protections providers.
well worth the fee they charge. they can get you the best deals. and if you are worried about their fees they can in certain circumstances be added to the mortgage,

walm

10,643 posts

228 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
jessica said:
Go and find a reputable financial advisor. That is what we did. We even had a choice of lenders and mortgage protections providers.
well worth the fee they charge. they can get you the best deals. and if you are worried about their fees they can in certain circumstances be added to the mortgage,
The IFA should have pointed out that generally mortgage protection is a scam.

To the OP: 25% LTV is now standard if you want the best rates.
However, as you have just spoken to one provider (your current one) obviously you don't want the best rates.

Remember when your fix ends, you should probably just stick on SVR - that's a good idea too. rolleyes

scotal

8,751 posts

305 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
walm said:
jessica said:
Go and find a reputable financial advisor. That is what we did. We even had a choice of lenders and mortgage protections providers.
well worth the fee they charge. they can get you the best deals. and if you are worried about their fees they can in certain circumstances be added to the mortgage,
The IFA should have pointed out that generally mortgage protection is a scam.

To the OP: 25% LTV is now standard if you want the best rates.
However, as you have just spoken to one provider (your current one) obviously you don't want the best rates.

Remember when your fix ends, you should probably just stick on SVR - that's a good idea too. rolleyes
He's on fixed rate Walm, he's tied in until 2010. If he's only putting the mortgage up a little, there's very little chance he's going to save the cost of the ERC with a new mortgage.

ASU can work for some people, it did for me. Mind you Single premium is a scam, no argument there.

Jessica, why did you go to an advisor that charges? And did they rebate the commission on the mortgage, or did they take double bubble?



andyquantum

Original Poster:

13,204 posts

230 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
I'm not too bothered about getting into a new house, just idle curiosity more than anything. I havent read the fine print on portability, the current lender would only go down the route of trackers so called an end to the call at that point.

Pity those who are trying to buy at the moment, average house of say £100k and no-one's doing much in the 90%+ LTV range anymore. I think when I first bought it was 95%, could have done 97% without too much trouble

walm

10,643 posts

228 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
scotal said:
He's on fixed rate Walm, he's tied in until 2010. If he's only putting the mortgage up a little, there's very little chance he's going to save the cost of the ERC with a new mortgage.
Sorry, good point, missed that. I retract my sarky comment. (It has been a bad day.)

Anyway, +1 on the check for portability.


anonymous-user

80 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
walm said:
jessica said:
Go and find a reputable financial advisor. That is what we did. We even had a choice of lenders and mortgage protections providers.
well worth the fee they charge. they can get you the best deals. and if you are worried about their fees they can in certain circumstances be added to the mortgage,
The IFA should have pointed out that generally mortgage protection is a scam.

To the OP: 25% LTV is now standard if you want the best rates.
However, as you have just spoken to one provider (your current one) obviously you don't want the best rates.

Remember when your fix ends, you should probably just stick on SVR - that's a good idea too. rolleyes
25%LTV is NOT now standard for the best rates, minimum 25% deposit is, which equates to 75% LTV (I think this is probably what you meant anyway, don't mean to be pedantic). Also many fixed rates no longer revert to SVR, some go to a tracker, e.g. base rate + 1.99%, which can actually be better than some of the new rates out there when you take into account arrangement fees and switching costs to move lenders.

Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 31st July 18:13

m3jappa

6,907 posts

244 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
With banks wanting 25% deposits then the only finale will be house prices dropping rather rapidly.

There is imo NO way a first time buyer can come up with 25%. Even if the house/flat is 100k thats still 25k which i doubt many can get their hands on.

It is for the best though imo as these prices need to settle back to realistic levels and if people can't borrow to buy them then they aren't getting sold.

Round here i,d need 36k plus 1800 stamp duty etc..... just for a little two bed.

walm

10,643 posts

228 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
yellowbentines said:
walm said:
To the OP: 25% LTV is now standard if you want the best rates.
However, as you have just spoken to one provider (your current one) obviously you don't want the best rates.

Remember when your fix ends, you should probably just stick on SVR - that's a good idea too. rolleyes
25%LTV is NOT now standard for the best rates, minimum 25% deposit is, which equates to 75% LTV (I think this is probably what you meant anyway, don't mean to be pedantic). Also many fixed rates no longer revert to SVR, some go to a tracker, e.g. base rate + 1.99%, which can actually be better than some of the new rates out there when you take into account arrangement fees and switching costs to move lenders.
Christ - I regret that post now.
25% deposit, 75% LTV is exactly what I meant. Sorry (again).

I am sure you are right about some SVR's being reasonable value, just not most.

Flintstone

8,644 posts

273 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
Coincidentally I've just been talking to my broker about this. He claims there are signs of lenders unclenching their sphincters a bit and easing off their knee-jerk reaction to Northern Rock.

Makes sense. After all if nobody can borrow money they can't make any. They're all leeches anyway. What's with these bl00dy arrangement fees? They're earning interest and they want ME to pay THEM to do so?

WTF?

RobJShe

17,911 posts

244 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
OP, I see you`re in Nottinghamshire. May I recommend the financial advisor I have just used? He has been very good to me despite me having to remortgage in the current economic climate.

205lad

310 posts

221 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
Flintstone said:
Coincidentally I've just been talking to my broker about this. He claims there are signs of lenders unclenching their sphincters a bit and easing off their knee-jerk reaction to Northern Rock.
It's nothing to do with the lenders. The 'lenders' are in effect 'borrowers' they borrow money from the markets to lend to you.

The fact they might be willing to pay more for what little money is available and then pass the charges onto you doesn't mean the magic endless money supply is going to be turned back on any time soon.

Jesus it amazes me that some people just don't get the bigger picture.

Flintstone

8,644 posts

273 months

Thursday 31st July 2008
quotequote all
Don't talk b0llocks. They've been too scared to lend for fear of a repeat.

"Sorry Simpkins, we're going to have to fire you for doing a Northern Rock". It amazes ME that some people put themselves up as internet experts when they have the sum of feck all idea about that which they spout rolleyes