A story of dishonesty, daylight robbery, disgust and deceit.
A story of dishonesty, daylight robbery, disgust and deceit.
Author
Discussion

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

243 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
Very disappointing that the OP couldn't be bothered to take this whole thing more seriously.

All he's done is hand the clampers another hollow victory.

F i F

48,337 posts

277 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
As above, why didn't you ask for a new date if you were in the middle of something that could not be missed?

Thread with 40-odd wasted pages.

I'd have more respect if you'd said "OK lads at the last minute I just bottled it."

Edited by F i F on Friday 20th November 10:02

B Oeuf

39,731 posts

310 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
I feel so cheated, so...........let down, it's like one of Flashmans posts

croyde

25,931 posts

256 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
Ah well! at least I can delete this from My Stuff.

Mr Green

936 posts

208 months

B Oeuf

39,731 posts

310 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
Mr Green said:
bout frigging time

oldsoak

5,618 posts

228 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
B Oeuf said:
Mr Green said:
bout frigging time the whole lot of them were banned never mind 'controlled'
EFA

JustinP1

13,358 posts

256 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
F i F said:
As above, why didn't you ask for a new date if you were in the middle of something that could not be missed?

Thread with 40-odd wasted pages.

I'd have more respect if you'd said "OK lads at the last minute I just bottled it."

Edited by F i F on Friday 20th November 10:02
I have to agree.

On the court allocation questionnaire you can specify dates that you are not available. Failing that, you can still ask the court to alter the date should you not be able to attend.

Failing even that, you can provide a witness statement and supply evidence.


To be honest, if he knew that he wasn't doing any of those, the best thing to do would be to inform all parties that the case was being dropped. At least that way he would have avoided the bill from the clampers coming to court.

The final outcome is that effectively that the OP has paid even more for his clamping...

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

274 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
Yeah, but his circumstances have changed now so he can laugh about it. Ho ho ho.


Pvapour

8,981 posts

279 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
Yeah, but his circumstances have changed now so he can laugh about it. Ho ho ho.
is that a subliminal message?

Dizzee now has extra income from his new Santa position xmas

F i F

48,337 posts

277 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
oldsoak said:
B Oeuf said:
Mr Green said:
bout frigging time the whole lot of them were banned never mind 'controlled'
EFA
this^^ i.e. banned not merely controlled.

I warned about this quite a few pages back. What this legislation will do is legitimise the buggers which is the last thing we want.

By all means private landowners have to have some method to deal with people who abuse their land. Clamping should not be one of those means, Scotland has dealt with it correctly.

By all means legislate about the private parking situation and take it away from civil law, really put the sods under notice to clean up their respective acts. To be honest I would include something about landowners having to have made some effort to deal with access, and not just by sticking a few grotty faded notices up.

No doubt if this even gets to the statute book before the pre-election slash and burn exercise, it will not have been thought through properly and will make things worse. << Prediction based on prev Labour legislation.

Mr Green

936 posts

208 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
IMO It was brave of you to take them on, I wouldn't have. That said the people that said beating them was a done deal encouraged you to challenge this(possibly unfair) charge and now moan because due to the pressures of life it didn't work out, the least they could do is to say well done for trying.

Well done anyway.

Pvapour

8,981 posts

279 months

Friday 20th November 2009
quotequote all
was it that millions of kids would not get their Christmas pressents ? having to manage the Elfs must be tricky I'd imagine smile

Gallen

2,166 posts

281 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
Dizeee

It's a shame you didn't see it through - whatever the reasons.

Can't understand why you didnt adjust the date or at the very least send in a letter and statement explaining your circumstances... but there you go.

I for one was rooting for you, as was JustinP1 judging by his detailed advice.

All the best.

cymtriks

4,561 posts

271 months

Friday 27th November 2009
quotequote all
Two ways to deal with this:

1) Get a garage to tow away the car complete with clamp. Send clampers the bill for car-ing the clamp (i.e. the opposite of clamping the car). This has actually been done!
2) Get a banger and park it on the space. Keep doing this. Keep reporting any removal of a car as theft. Say you'll stop if all costs are paid. Tell Argos that their manager is complicit in the theft (as his store employs the people making the theft) and cc him/her correspondence with the BiB. Tell him this face to face and tell him that you'll carry on until your bill is paid. Any bets on how many bangers you'd need?

Why can't you remove the clamp? Surely if you insist that the clamp is a component of your car and therefore your property the onus is on everyone else to prove that it isn't yours?


There's another way. Never park in a space with a clamping sign anywhere near it unless you are clearly displaying a correct ticket/residents card/etc. I do this. Worked so far.