This year's self obsessed idiots
Discussion
Frankeh said:
Why is he abandoning it work for Sirrallllan??Frankeh said:
Bluewave Website said:
BlueWave Communications Ltd was incorporated in 2007
A Source said:
Company Name BLUEWAVE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
Incorporation Date 13/04/2007
Company Status Non trading
Principal Activity The company did not trade during y/e 30.04.09
Current Directors
Name Craig Temkin
Financials: Nothing.
Hmmm, okay, maybe it's this one instead:Incorporation Date 13/04/2007
Company Status Non trading
Principal Activity The company did not trade during y/e 30.04.09
Current Directors
Name Craig Temkin
Financials: Nothing.
A Source said:
Company Name BLUEWAVE COMMUNICATIONS (UK) LIMITED
Incorporation Date 07/09/2005
Company Status Active - Accounts Filed
Current Directors
Name Craig Temkin
Financials: Small
Something stinks here.Incorporation Date 07/09/2005
Company Status Active - Accounts Filed
Current Directors
Name Craig Temkin
Financials: Small
Frankeh said:
Decent enough website, but if he is that successful why go on The Apprentice?I watched this once. They were all totally unlikeable vacuous w
kers and then we have Sugar in charge of the whole shebang and he's a fanny too. Why would you want to work for Amstrad anyway? To learn how to take a commanding market position and turn yourself into a company that makes knock off digi boxes?
kers and then we have Sugar in charge of the whole shebang and he's a fanny too. Why would you want to work for Amstrad anyway? To learn how to take a commanding market position and turn yourself into a company that makes knock off digi boxes?Oakey said:
Tom74 said:
Oakey said:
Stuff about bluewave...
It won't be a UK company so unlikely to find it at companies house.Okay, well how about this for something of more interest.
Alan Sugar doesn't currently hold any Directorships and 'Amscreen', the company that last years winner went on to work for has a turnover of.... £2million last year.
Profit After Tax -£2,023,121
Alan Sugar doesn't currently hold any Directorships and 'Amscreen', the company that last years winner went on to work for has a turnover of.... £2million last year.
Profit After Tax -£2,023,121
Edited as I was looking at the wrong company.
Edited by Oakey on Wednesday 29th September 16:39
hyperblue said:
Why would you go on this if you were actually an investment banker? Certainly not for the money 
And as above, the camera seems to have added 10 years to some of them!
Yea that's something I don't understand... Are they back office/admin guys who say they've worked at "XX Bank" to make themselves sound better, or are they actually taking a pay cut/loss of expected future earnings by being on the show? And as above, the camera seems to have added 10 years to some of them!I thought when quality people left banks, it was to start companies like Ocado. Not to appear on the tele and have to sell cheese to the French or dog collars to PetSmart in have the chance to earn 100k.
Lardydah said:
hyperblue said:
Why would you go on this if you were actually an investment banker? Certainly not for the money And as above, the camera seems to have added 10 years to some of them!
Yea that's something I don't understand... Are they back office/admin guys who say they've worked at "XX Bank" to make themselves sound better, or are they actually taking a pay cut/loss of expected future earnings by being on the show? And as above, the camera seems to have added 10 years to some of them!I thought when quality people left banks, it was to start companies like Ocado. Not to appear on the tele and have to sell cheese to the French or dog collars to PetSmart in have the chance to earn 100k.
They're all doing it to be on TV anyway so it doesn't matter.
Alan Sugar is a silly caricature of a man at this point and as somebody mentioned he royally fked up his very successful company.
Why should people listen to him? And what does selling cheese have to do with being a good employee at Amstrad?
Alan Sugar is a silly caricature of a man at this point and as somebody mentioned he royally f
ked up his very successful company. Why should people listen to him? And what does selling cheese have to do with being a good employee at Amstrad?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/apprentice/
Watch their auditions. Not got sound at the moment so I'll have to wait until I get home.
Watch their auditions. Not got sound at the moment so I'll have to wait until I get home.
Is Sugar the 'Cowell' of the 'successful' business world?
Personality of a soap dish, ego of a porn director.
Tossers the lot of em.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00v36yt/Harr...
Personality of a soap dish, ego of a porn director.
Tossers the lot of em.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00v36yt/Harr...
Smiler. said:
Is Sugar the 'Cowell' of the 'successful' business world?
Personality of a soap dish, ego of a porn director.
Tossers the lot of em.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00v36yt/Harr...
No, because whereas Cowell is someone who failed, then got back on his feet to become ever increasingly successful, Sugar is someone who became sucessful, had a company that at one point was as valuable as Microsoft and Apple, then went on to make blunder after blunder (Amstrad e-m@iler? "it'll be dead by xmas" - talking about the ipod) and now has a property portfolio and a sPersonality of a soap dish, ego of a porn director.
Tossers the lot of em.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00v36yt/Harr...
tty digital signage advertising company that doesn't seem to be doing much.http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00b8r0y
I hope he mentions that he's alive to Sugar. That's a huge plus.
I know when I'm looking for employees I try to find living ones.
I hope he mentions that he's alive to Sugar. That's a huge plus.
I know when I'm looking for employees I try to find living ones.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff