Unmarked plod with radar gun
Unmarked plod with radar gun
Author
Discussion

agtlaw

7,345 posts

232 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
Point of order. very unlikely to have been radar. Does any police force in E&W still use that?

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

243 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
Forgive me if I sound blunt, but I doubt the concept of speed limits being in existence in this country is an alien concept to anyone on this thread. I also doubt the idea that these speed limits are enforced by various means is a surprise, either. In the OPs case, I doubt the fact that it was a 30mph section was a secret kept from him and thrust upon him by surprise (his opening post seems to suggest he knew the limit).

Adding these things together, I fail to understand what would lead someone to justifiably feel 'indignant', were they to be caught or even have their speed checked, in order to enforce the limits you know exist, expect to be enforced and know are in force at that time and place?

I have sped, I will more than likely continue to speed and, if and when I am caught for doing so again, I will lay the blame squarely on myself for letting myself get caught, not moan on endlessly about how the whole thing is some money making scam or grand conspiracy to defraud the tax payer.

voyds9

8,490 posts

309 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
You probably broke just as many laws as the policeman did driving to the same location however, one of you may get a fine.

Hardly fair but thems the breaks.

Latty666

Original Poster:

259 posts

174 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
There is no real moaning, yes if I get a penalty I will most likely moan, most probably about the law, yes I knew it was a 30, although not keeping an exact eye on the speedo I wasn't fully aware I was approaching 40mph , unfortunately I do , like everybody else occasionally break the speed limit, I posted on here to gain advice from fellow motorists who may have experienced a similar situation, but instead seemed to have started a series of abuse , insults and political opinions about the law, anyway, is that the time....

DaveZT260

599 posts

175 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all


Edited by DaveZT260 on Sunday 17th June 21:23

Shaw Tarse

31,850 posts

229 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
DaveZT260 said:
mybrainhurts said:
:cough: speed awareness course :cough:
New BM's and flash cars was your comment. Small minded and ill informed - a typical reaction by someone who has been caught and the only way to deal with your error is to have a pop at the police like that....
Was it MBH's comment?

btdk5

1,862 posts

216 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
You were passing through a small village where people using the road expect vehicles to be travelling at 30mph or so, driving at around 30% more than the speed limit and not paying enough attention to notice a speed trap.

Just admit you were doing something wrong and stop trying to make an alternate fantasy story out of it where you're the innocent one.
You're hardly one to talk

Timbuk2

1,955 posts

181 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
That's what I was thinking

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

281 months

Monday 18th June 2012
quotequote all
Shaw Tarse said:
DaveZT260 said:
mybrainhurts said:
:cough: speed awareness course :cough:
New BM's and flash cars was your comment. Small minded and ill informed - a typical reaction by someone who has been caught and the only way to deal with your error is to have a pop at the police like that....
Was it MBH's comment?
:cough: No :cough:

Another fine miscarriage of justice...hehe

CraigyMc

18,355 posts

262 months

Monday 18th June 2012
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
Point of order. very unlikely to have been radar. Does any police force in E&W still use that?
Don't think so.

I'm not connected with the police at all but from what I understand from various websites, it's more likely to be Lidar (like an LTi 20/20).

In this case, the actual device is a lot less interested to me than who was holding it at the time.

C

anonymous-user

80 months

Monday 18th June 2012
quotequote all
btdk5 said:
10 Pence Short said:
You were passing through a small village where people using the road expect vehicles to be travelling at 30mph or so, driving at around 30% more than the speed limit and not paying enough attention to notice a speed trap.

Just admit you were doing something wrong and stop trying to make an alternate fantasy story out of it where you're the innocent one.
You're hardly one to talk
I'd say 10p's experience may give him more reason than most to make comment. I'm pretty sure he's admitted his guilt and paid his dues and moved on. Suggest you do too.

Back to subject... I'll drive enthusiatically on open roads but a 30 is a limit I never exceed - built up area/village (and therefore it's very likely that there will be people on foot) and excess speed is a potential recipe for disaster.

Deva Link

26,934 posts

271 months

Monday 18th June 2012
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Back to subject... I'll drive enthusiatically on open roads but a 30 is a limit I never exceed - built up area/village (and therefore it's very likely that there will be people on foot) and excess speed is a potential recipe for disaster.
In all my years of driving I must never have come across another PHer on the road because if I drive at 30 (easy in my auto, speed limiter equipped, Merc) where a higher speed would be perfectly reasonable, it causes all sorts of stupid driving around me - tailgating, overtaking in dangerous places etc etc.

anonymous-user

80 months

Monday 18th June 2012
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
garyhun said:
Back to subject... I'll drive enthusiatically on open roads but a 30 is a limit I never exceed - built up area/village (and therefore it's very likely that there will be people on foot) and excess speed is a potential recipe for disaster.
In all my years of driving I must never have come across another PHer on the road because if I drive at 30 (easy in my auto, speed limiter equipped, Merc) where a higher speed would be perfectly reasonable, it causes all sorts of stupid driving around me - tailgating, overtaking in dangerous places etc etc.
I know the feeling well!

Deva Link

26,934 posts

271 months

Monday 18th June 2012
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
DaveZT260 said:
a money making scam
:cough: speed awareness course :cough:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13022347

A little off topic but a colleague was mine had to attend a speed awareness course a couple of weeks ago after being done for 46 in a 40 on the M42 variable. Most of the people onthe course had been caught the same way.

That's nothing to do with safety at all, it's about traffic management.

Frenchda

1,341 posts

259 months

Tuesday 19th June 2012
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
SV8Predator said:
Latty666 said:
before any houses etc, so no real risk early on a Sunday morning
Does that it's OK to speed Then?
Sunday morning, Nice weather. He was after the real idiots on 2 wheels I expect.
Like bikes then?

Frenchda

1,341 posts

259 months

Tuesday 19th June 2012
quotequote all
I must be reading the OP wrong. As far as I can make out he is not winging or making excuses just asking if anyone can shed some light on whether he may be getting a nice letter but instead has been slated for the crime of the century.

Edited by Frenchda on Tuesday 19th June 15:44

jaf01uk

1,943 posts

222 months

Tuesday 19th June 2012
quotequote all
Frenchda said:
I must be reading the OP wrong. As far as I can make out he is not winging or making excuses just asking if anyone can shed some light on whether he may be getting a nice letter but instead has been slated for the crime of the century.

Edited by Frenchda on Tuesday 19th June 15:44
Position normal these days on here, almost like youtube round here lately, I sometimes wonder why some of them come on a motoring enthusiasts site and then spout so much bile about someone doing 7mph over a limit when the road is deserted other than a sneaky plod hiding behind a tree....
Gary

Furry Exocet

3,011 posts

207 months

Tuesday 19th June 2012
quotequote all
Frenchda said:
I must be reading the OP wrong. As far as I can make out he is not winging or making excuses just asking if anyone can shed some light on whether he may be getting a nice letter but instead has been slated for the crime of the century.

Edited by Frenchda on Tuesday 19th June 15:44
that was answered in the 1st reply.
This is pistonheads and its what I've come to expect


Wozy68

5,436 posts

196 months

Wednesday 20th June 2012
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
You were passing through a small village where people using the road expect vehicles to be travelling at 30mph or so, driving at around 30% more than the speed limit and not paying enough attention to notice a speed trap.

Just admit you were doing something wrong and stop trying to make an alternate fantasy story out of it where you're the innocent one.
This ^

24700 replies over 75 months. That's on average 330 comments a month. rolleyes

You can see why he comes out with agressive replies like this, I doubt he even read the opening post. He's a know it all that has absolutly no one else (or is incapable of) to talk too.

So spends his time on here typing out dribble like the above.


scarble

5,277 posts

183 months

Wednesday 20th June 2012
quotequote all
Wozy68 said:
spends his time on here typing out dribble like the above.
I love you.

I have also noticed that plod like to hide while using these laydar(or whatever) guns, I'm sure they do it deliberately so everyone brakes sharply, then they can do you for dangerous driving too.