RE: TVR's new owner: PH Meets
RE: TVR's new owner: PH Meets
Author
Discussion

leef44

5,169 posts

179 months

Friday 14th June 2013
quotequote all
Heathyboy said:
Great news. I heard from a reliable source that they are in fact making a new model. It is a 23ltr W16 Quadruple Turbo ChimaCerbaGriff - but I'm not interested because apparently it will have flappy gear change - really flappy ones.
This must be true. I heard this too. Or was that from you? ...can't remember.

Anyway, friend of a friend sent me this picture from Les' R&D department for the flappy paddle gearshift.


Munter

31,331 posts

267 months

Friday 14th June 2013
quotequote all
leef44 said:
This must be true. I heard this too. Or was that from you? ...can't remember.

Anyway, friend of a friend sent me this picture from Les' R&D department for the flappy paddle gearshift.

That's clearly a tuskan. Just look at the trunk.

leef44

5,169 posts

179 months

Friday 14th June 2013
quotequote all
Munter said:
leef44 said:
This must be true. I heard this too. Or was that from you? ...can't remember.

Anyway, friend of a friend sent me this picture from Les' R&D department for the flappy paddle gearshift.

That's clearly a tuskan. Just look at the trunk.
hehe

Troubleatmill

10,210 posts

185 months

Friday 14th June 2013
quotequote all
For TVR to live longer than 3 years - I would listen to the current UK owners - but I wouldn't base a whole business around it.
The survival and business growth money is elsewhere ( and not on this continent )


Dumb question follows.
Lotus Evora - Really really nice handling and rather respectable performance car. Reasonably pretty too. Priced well. Doesn't sell enough to be viable.


What could Les learn from this to turn lead into gold?







Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

272 months

Saturday 15th June 2013
quotequote all
Troubleatmill said:
Lotus Evora - Really really nice handling and rather respectable performance car. Doesn't sell enough to be viable.

Q: What could Les learn from this to turn lead into gold?
A: Don't try to invent a new niche for a questionably styled, mid-engined 2+2 with a Japanese V6 standing high above the rear axle.

Shouldn't be too hard to avoid that particular can of worms.



lazyitus

19,931 posts

292 months

Saturday 15th June 2013
quotequote all
Troubleatmill said:
Lotus Evora -.Reasonably pretty too. Priced well. Doesn't sell enough to be viable.
You might think it's pretty, but the general consensus is that it looks st. But I understand that some people like to gloss over that fact, or ignore it as they'd like to see a British car doing well, perhaps. Hence your use of the word 'reasonably'. Unfortunately, that just isn't enough.

I don't think looks should be underestimated. Undoubtedly one of the biggest factors for sports car purchasers when deciding to buy. If manufacturers get this wrong, even just slightly, they'll suffer. Period.

wemorgan

3,583 posts

204 months

Saturday 15th June 2013
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Right, bored with all this now, until there are some concrete details I am going to ignore these threads, realistically Mr Edgar has just bought the company and with the best will in the world it will take a while to get something to market, if it happens, I don't think we can sustain this level of speculation and interest.
^ Very true. In all probability it'll be at least 2-3 years before cars roll off the line. Just imagine where this thread and all that speculation will have ended up in the meantime!

V8 Fettler

7,019 posts

158 months

Saturday 15th June 2013
quotequote all
He only has to get one thing right: the engine, and that has to be LS. The rest will follow (broad brush!)

Jasandjules

72,168 posts

255 months

Saturday 15th June 2013
quotequote all
[redacted]

DonkeyApple

68,167 posts

195 months

Saturday 15th June 2013
quotequote all
wemorgan said:
J4CKO said:
Right, bored with all this now, until there are some concrete details I am going to ignore these threads, realistically Mr Edgar has just bought the company and with the best will in the world it will take a while to get something to market, if it happens, I don't think we can sustain this level of speculation and interest.
^ Very true. In all probability it'll be at least 2-3 years before cars roll off the line. Just imagine where this thread and all that speculation will have ended up in the meantime!
Why assume that the first part of the project was buying the brand? It could just as easily be the final part of the project.

Chilliman

12,331 posts

187 months

Saturday 15th June 2013
quotequote all
[redacted]

wemorgan

3,583 posts

204 months

Saturday 15th June 2013
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Why assume that the first part of the project was buying the brand? It could just as easily be the final part of the project.
Good point. But I've not heard of any R&D jobs going for a new small OEM/kit car company in the past year or two, so assumed he was just at the beginning of his journey.

Big Dave C

4 posts

226 months

Sunday 16th June 2013
quotequote all
Well done Mr Edgar i take my hat of to you, you have done more than these people on this site giving you negativity what ever you produce will keep the TVR logo alive. and that can only be good for all tvr owners

christof

966 posts

310 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
So here is my proposal based on the fact that any new car must have EEC small series type approval amd meet the EEC emission laws.

There are some exeptions for small manufacturers type approval, e.g. pedestrian protection, crash testing, etc,, BUT there is no way around the emission and noise laws.

The only way to guarantee a long term business plan is to approach a major car manufacturer for selling engine, drivetrain, ECU, etc and helping to make everything work together.

The german small series manufacturer Wiesmann proved it can be done with help from BMW, even Morgan is on the right track with their partnerships with Ford and BMW.

Achieving EURO 6 emission with all the control modes will be even harder.
Making an ABS, TC and ESP system working and getting it type approved is not doable without support of one of the major players.

So what about asking Audi for getting the TT-RS drivetrain with all the components plus all the comfort installations like heating and AC system and build a car around them.

The 5 cylinder engine is good for 400-450bhp and EURO 6 and creates an awesome noise, 4WD will enhance driving dynamics and experience..

Make it light, let's say around 1100KG, which should be achievable based on the fact that a TT-RS is only 1400KG and you will have the ultimate driving machine which will eat all GT3's for breakfast.

Another benefit would be that any Audi dealership can help with engine or electrics problems and therefore will help with trust in reliability.

Christof


Tyre Tread

10,665 posts

242 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
christof said:
So here is my proposal based on the fact that any new car must have EEC small series type approval amd meet the EEC emission laws.

There are some exeptions for small manufacturers type approval, e.g. pedestrian protection, crash testing, etc,, BUT there is no way around the emission and noise laws.

The only way to guarantee a long term business plan is to approach a major car manufacturer for selling engine, drivetrain, ECU, etc and helping to make everything work together.

The german small series manufacturer Wiesmann proved it can be done with help from BMW, even Morgan is on the right track with their partnerships with Ford and BMW.

Achieving EURO 6 emission with all the control modes will be even harder.
Making an ABS, TC and ESP system working and getting it type approved is not doable without support of one of the major players.

So what about asking Audi for getting the TT-RS drivetrain with all the components plus all the comfort installations like heating and AC system and build a car around them.

The 5 cylinder engine is good for 400-450bhp and EURO 6 and creates an awesome noise, 4WD will enhance driving dynamics and experience..

Make it light, let's say around 1100KG, which should be achievable based on the fact that a TT-RS is only 1400KG and you will have the ultimate driving machine which will eat all GT3's for breakfast.

Another benefit would be that any Audi dealership can help with engine or electrics problems and therefore will help with trust in reliability.

Christof
Build it around an Audi platform and I, for one, am oot. Especially 4WD!

It needs to be as simple and light as possible with as many horses and few driver aids as possible.

RemarkLima

2,799 posts

238 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
christof said:
The 5 cylinder engine is good for 400-450bhp and EURO 6 and creates an awesome noise, 4WD will enhance driving dynamics and experience..
4WD??? Are you mad???

christof said:
Make it light, let's say around 1100KG, which should be achievable based on the fact that a TT-RS is only 1400KG and you will have the ultimate driving machine which will eat all GT3's for breakfast.
Save weight by not having it 4WD - I think an integral part of the TVR DNA is RWD.

Sounds like you want an Audi TT without the 4 rings and a TVR badge...

TA14

14,332 posts

284 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
RemarkLima said:
Sounds like you want an Audi TT without the 4 rings and a TVR badge...
Quite. Whilst I'm not an Audi fan I respect their engineers and thrying to save a quarter of the weight of a TT (whilst keeping the 4WD) is going to be very difficult to say the least.

900T-R

20,406 posts

283 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
Um, enhanced dynamics and Audi? Ever seen where the engine is in relation to the front axle? silly

JonRB

79,797 posts

298 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
900T-R said:
Um, enhanced dynamics and Audi? Ever seen where the engine is in relation to the front axle? silly
It always amused me that, back when Ferrari first proclaimed that they had mounted the engine behind the front axle in their new front-engined car and invented the "front mid-engined" concept, and the motoring press collectively wet themselves like an excited puppy, that both TVR and Caterham had already been doing that for years.

Audi, by contrast, have almost always slung their engines out way forward of the axle line (R8 excepted). It's almost like the reverse of the Porsche 911.

Chilliman

12,331 posts

187 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
Tyre Tread said:
christof said:
So here is my proposal based on the fact that any new car must have EEC small series type approval amd meet the EEC emission laws.

There are some exeptions for small manufacturers type approval, e.g. pedestrian protection, crash testing, etc,, BUT there is no way around the emission and noise laws.

The only way to guarantee a long term business plan is to approach a major car manufacturer for selling engine, drivetrain, ECU, etc and helping to make everything work together.

The german small series manufacturer Wiesmann proved it can be done with help from BMW, even Morgan is on the right track with their partnerships with Ford and BMW.

Achieving EURO 6 emission with all the control modes will be even harder.
Making an ABS, TC and ESP system working and getting it type approved is not doable without support of one of the major players.

So what about asking Audi for getting the TT-RS drivetrain with all the components plus all the comfort installations like heating and AC system and build a car around them.

The 5 cylinder engine is good for 400-450bhp and EURO 6 and creates an awesome noise, 4WD will enhance driving dynamics and experience..

Make it light, let's say around 1100KG, which should be achievable based on the fact that a TT-RS is only 1400KG and you will have the ultimate driving machine which will eat all GT3's for breakfast.

Another benefit would be that any Audi dealership can help with engine or electrics problems and therefore will help with trust in reliability.

Christof
Build it around an Audi platform and I, for one, am oot. Especially 4WD!

It needs to be as simple and light as possible with as many horses and few driver aids as possible.
That's just wrong on so many levels. I'm sure the car you're suggesting might be brilliant, but, and this is obviously my personal opinion, I don't think I could think of it as a TVR. To me, it would be an Audi without the tin body. Sorry. And I don't have the answer to what the new TVR should be in order to establish a successful business. I'm just a cook.

Chilli smile