Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 2]
Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 2]
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Agrispeed

988 posts

185 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
monthefish said:
OlberJ said:
If stealing from a shop requires you to leave the premises with the goods, what if you walked into Sainsburys, drank a case of beer and then went for a slash in the toilets before leaving suitably drunk.

Still theft?
Presumably, as most of the alchohol content was on (in) your person as you left the store.
And even if you've peed the entire batch down the sewer you've still permanently deprived the owner.
Theft can simply be assuming the rights of the owner though. By drinking the beer, it could be argued that you have taken the owners rights. Also, you do not need to leave a shop to steal -simply putting the item closer to the door intending to later steal is theft.

Also, you would've returned the item in a poorer condition which could also be theft, or at least criminal damage. hehe

Shaolin

2,955 posts

215 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
kowalski655 said:
Dr Jekyll said:
And even if you've peed the entire batch down the sewer you've still permanently deprived the owner.
Unless you nicked Carlsberg,drank it,pissed back in the bottle & replaced it on the shelf-not like it would taste any different
I'm pretty sure I've drunk some of that.

TheEnd

15,370 posts

214 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
Shaolin said:
kowalski655 said:
Dr Jekyll said:
And even if you've peed the entire batch down the sewer you've still permanently deprived the owner.
Unless you nicked Carlsberg,drank it,pissed back in the bottle & replaced it on the shelf-not like it would taste any different
I'm pretty sure I've drunk some of that.
Funny you mention that, I did that trick on someone once.

The pub I used to go to was a converted basement or cellar, and if you wanted a cigarette, you'd have to go out the front door and hang about in this little smoking area.
You couldn't take your drinks outside, so they were all left on tables and ledges just inside the door.

It was getting bad for people stealing drinks, you wouldn't dare leave a £5's worth of vodka and redbull, and anything close to a full bottle would go missing too.

At the time I was drinking Sol, and I planned ahead a little. When I finished the bottle I had, I took it to the toilets and filled it up, and it was the perfect colour too.
Out for a cigarette, leave the bait inside the door and see what happens.

Amazingly it worked, and the bottle vanished, and was left again at the bottom of the stairs with a mouthful gone.

It worked like a charm, apart from the fact I never saw the pee-thief.

I always wondered what the chain of events were, did they spit it out, did they try and remain cool instead of shouting to their mates they've just drank a mouthful of aqua vita, whether they even knew what they just drank etc

If you are ever in a dive like that and someone nabs your drink, get a bottle next wink

CR6ZZ

1,313 posts

171 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
When an aircraft first touches down the stress on the wheels/tyres, not to mention the wear and rubber loss from friction, in going from stationary to spinning flat out in a nanosecond must be immense. Why isn't there some device (e.g. vanes) or mechanism fitted to start the wheel spinning in readiness for landing as soon as the undercarriage is lowered?

Ayahuasca

27,560 posts

305 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
CR6ZZ said:
When an aircraft first touches down the stress on the wheels/tyres, not to mention the wear and rubber loss from friction, in going from stationary to spinning flat out in a nanosecond must be immense. Why isn't there some device (e.g. vanes) or mechanism fitted to start the wheel spinning in readiness for landing as soon as the undercarriage is lowered?
Repost. I asked that ages ago. smile

sherman

15,066 posts

241 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
CR6ZZ said:
When an aircraft first touches down the stress on the wheels/tyres, not to mention the wear and rubber loss from friction, in going from stationary to spinning flat out in a nanosecond must be immense. Why isn't there some device (e.g. vanes) or mechanism fitted to start the wheel spinning in readiness for landing as soon as the undercarriage is lowered?
Repost. I asked that ages ago. smile
and the answer was?

Ayahuasca

27,560 posts

305 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
WeirdNeville said:
The benefits of spinning the wheels up prior to landing clearly don't outweigh the problems and costs of doing so, as they don't do it.
This was the answer.

CR6ZZ

1,313 posts

171 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
Ta. Figured it had to be something like that....

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

175 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
It's the cost associated with the fuel penalty of lugging around the weight of a device to spin the wheels up versus the cost of tyres & bearings plus the fact that the engineering involved in landing gear is well proven & reliable.

onyx39

11,349 posts

176 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
Also, I think I read somewhere that (albeit only a tiny amount) it assists with slowing of the aircraft.

HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

208 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
What is "periodic" about the Periodic Table?

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

175 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
Periods are another name for rows I think. Don't quote me on that though.

PoleDriver

29,496 posts

220 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
Funny you mention that, I did that trick on someone once.

The pub I used to go to was a converted basement or cellar, and if you wanted a cigarette, you'd have to go out the front door and hang about in this little smoking area.
You couldn't take your drinks outside, so they were all left on tables and ledges just inside the door.

It was getting bad for people stealing drinks, you wouldn't dare leave a £5's worth of vodka and redbull, and anything close to a full bottle would go missing too.

At the time I was drinking Sol, and I planned ahead a little. When I finished the bottle I had, I took it to the toilets and filled it up, and it was the perfect colour too.
Out for a cigarette, leave the bait inside the door and see what happens.

Amazingly it worked, and the bottle vanished, and was left again at the bottom of the stairs with a mouthful gone.

It worked like a charm, apart from the fact I never saw the pee-thief.

I always wondered what the chain of events were, did they spit it out, did they try and remain cool instead of shouting to their mates they've just drank a mouthful of aqua vita, whether they even knew what they just drank etc

If you are ever in a dive like that and someone nabs your drink, get a bottle next wink
Did that at Le Mans a few years back. On Sunday afternoon and Monday morning (after the race) many campsites were swamped with 'do-as-you-likeys' who would grab anything they could. We left a six-pack of refilled stubby beers next to the car. 20 minutes later they'd disappeared! smile
I often wondered if they could tell the difference! whistle

Gizmoish

18,150 posts

235 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
WeirdNeville said:
Elements repeat their properties with specific periods if you put them in order of atomic mass. This periodicity gives groups of elements which behave in similar ways. They form the vertical columns in the periodic table.
<and more really good stuff>
clap

I've always been fascinated by the lanthanide/actinide group...

ShampooEfficient

4,278 posts

237 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
Nom de ploom said:
why don't the pedestrian crossings beep anymore when the green man is on? I thought the beeps were to aid the blind in crossing the road?
Depends how close they are to the next one.

HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

208 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
WeirdNeville said:
HereBeMonsters said:
What is "periodic" about the Periodic Table?
Elements repeat their properties with specific periods if you put them in order of atomic mass. This periodicity gives groups of elements which behave in similar ways. They form the vertical columns in the periodic table.



So you can see for example the group of "alkali metals" forming the left hand column: Sodium, Potassium, Caesium, Rubidium and Francium: All behave in similar ways. they're low melting point metals, solid at roo temperature, and highly reactive with water. They're even increasingly exciting as you go down the list and chuck a bit in the bath (from a bit of bubbling to there not being much of the bath left).
THe inert and Halogen gases are all similar in they way they behave.

So, ordering elements by atomic mass gives rise to periodic repetition of certain properties, grouping those properties gives you the periodic table.
WTF?

How long is this "period" of repetition of certain properties? I really don't get this, sorry!

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

252 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
HereBeMonsters said:
WTF?

How long is this "period" of repetition of certain properties? I really don't get this, sorry!
It's not a period of time. Basically, elements with similar electron configurations behave similarly. These similar configurations appear in a rhythmic manner as atomic number increases, hence periodicity.

When you lay out the elements in a table in a certain way, you can group elements together - for example, the halogens (fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine and astatine) form a group, as they have similar chemical properties.

The Wikipedia page is quite good at explaining it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table

RenesisEvo

3,821 posts

245 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
ShampooEfficient said:
Nom de ploom said:
why don't the pedestrian crossings beep anymore when the green man is on? I thought the beeps were to aid the blind in crossing the road?
Depends how close they are to the next one.
Whilst I understand the proximity issue for blind people, there's a crossing I use regularly that it well away from other crossings. On some occasions, it beeps away. On some, it doesn't, as I once only twigged the lights had changed when a car stopped. Why the variation?

crmcatee

5,798 posts

253 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
RenesisEvo said:
ShampooEfficient said:
Nom de ploom said:
why don't the pedestrian crossings beep anymore when the green man is on? I thought the beeps were to aid the blind in crossing the road?
Depends how close they are to the next one.
Whilst I understand the proximity issue for blind people, there's a crossing I use regularly that it well away from other crossings. On some occasions, it beeps away. On some, it doesn't, as I once only twigged the lights had changed when a car stopped. Why the variation?
I did post earlier in response. They've probably been changed to be blind / deaf friendly - e.g. have a tactile interface underneath the button module; look for a little sticky out thing which will vibrate when it's time to cross.

I didn't think a staggered crossing had bleepers at all.

steveo3002

11,135 posts

200 months

Thursday 20th June 2013
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
Funny you mention that, I did that trick on someone once.

I always wondered what the chain of events were, did they spit it out, did they try and remain cool instead of shouting to their mates they've just drank a mouthful of aqua vita, whether they even knew what they just drank etc
like this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHXrfajDn9s
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED