The Official Liverpool FC thread [Vol 6]
Discussion
Glenred said:
RedTrident said:
I like to revisit old ground .
Nooooo...... I don’t believe it 
Not you.Go back and find the posts where everyone bar you said they were all amazing signings.
Most posters said they were pleased with AC but not at 35m, no one wanted Downing, and most thought Henderson was overpriced and as for Borini he was an unheard of player.
But most people also supported them as they were all Liverpool players
The only time I've been remotely satisfied in our transfers was this January after FSG introduced a new committee based approach to transfers. So far this window its also proving to be interesting with players being lined up that most of us haven't really followed. Its at that talent/potential level with a price to match this rather than overpaying for potential (as in Henderson/Allen/Borini) or paying top prices for average players (Downing - 20 million, ffs that is as bad as Carroll).
Hopefully we still buy a centre back and a winger.
te, no matter how you dress it up.
Hmmm, I think it was Glen....GALLARDOGUY said:
RedTrident said:
Not only did many think they WERE amazing signings, some actually thought they'd help us win the title even.
You're just making things up now.Happy with the fixture list GG?
RedTrident said:
GALLARDOGUY said:
RedTrident said:
Not only did many think they WERE amazing signings, some actually thought they'd help us win the title even.
You're just making things up now.
How is that relevant?
Find one post where someone says any of the players you mentioned are amazing signings. And one post where someone says that they will help form a title winning squad.
Thanks.
(Fixture list is fine, but once again irrelevant to what we are discussing)
Its relevant because it was an attempt to divert away from the worst manager we've had in modern times and the worst use of 100 million pounds.
And yes if anyone can be bothered to go back I'm sure they'll find plenty of posters drooling at the prospect of a Carroll Downing partnership with world class Adam pulling the strings with his wand of a left foot.
Deal with it, blindly backing turd doesn't stop them being anything but turd, regardless how much you pay for it.
And yes if anyone can be bothered to go back I'm sure they'll find plenty of posters drooling at the prospect of a Carroll Downing partnership with world class Adam pulling the strings with his wand of a left foot.
Deal with it, blindly backing turd doesn't stop them being anything but turd, regardless how much you pay for it.
RedTrident said:
Its relevant because it was an attempt to divert away from the worst manager we've had in modern times and the worst use of 100 million pounds.
And yes if anyone can be bothered to go back I'm sure they'll find plenty of posters drooling at the prospect of a Carroll Downing partnership with world class Adam pulling the strings with his wand of a left foot.
Deal with it, blindly backing turd doesn't stop them being anything but turd, regardless how much you pay for it.
More irrelevant waffle without answers or proof of what you are stating.And yes if anyone can be bothered to go back I'm sure they'll find plenty of posters drooling at the prospect of a Carroll Downing partnership with world class Adam pulling the strings with his wand of a left foot.
Deal with it, blindly backing turd doesn't stop them being anything but turd, regardless how much you pay for it.
As others have said, Groundhog Day.
I will leave you to it Raja.
Gassing Station | Football | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff