Jihaddi John....
Discussion
Lordbenny said:
Can someone pleas explain why the media and politicians are using this name. It a comical name but Cameron has chosen to use it intentionally but I really don't know why.
Isn't that how he's referred to by IS, due to his English accent (Beatles reference). The media picked up on it and now that's how he's known in the public consciousness. Even if CMD know's the suspects real name, he's unlikely to use it in public in case he's wrong.
ukbabz said:
Isn't that how he's referred to by IS, due to his English accent (Beatles reference). The media picked up on it and now that's how he's known in the public consciousness.
Even if CMD know's the suspects real name, he's unlikely to use it in public in case he's wrong.
Getting close - because there were 4 guards for the captives who were British, the captives called them the 'Beatles'. Each one had a name, and this particularly offensive individual was given John, after Mr Lennon. Even if CMD know's the suspects real name, he's unlikely to use it in public in case he's wrong.
Why give these people what they want? If the Islamic State refer to him as Jihadi John why not refer to him as something he'd hate - Gay Gordon, Paul the Pig, or name him after a famous Shiite or Jewish figure (nothing against Shiites or Jews however Islamic State members would hate this).
Or just refer to him by his real name - surely the spooks must be 100% sure about his identity by now.
Or just refer to him by his real name - surely the spooks must be 100% sure about his identity by now.
BlackLabel said:
Why give these people what they want? If the Islamic State refer to him as Jihadi John why not refer to him as something he'd hate - Gay Gordon, Paul the Pig, or name him after a famous Shiite or Jewish figure (nothing against Shiites or Jews however Islamic State members would hate this).
Or just refer to him by his real name - surely the spooks must be 100% sure about his identity by now.
This.Or just refer to him by his real name - surely the spooks must be 100% sure about his identity by now.
I why aren't we waging a media war against IS? Why are we, collectively lending them legitimacy by referring to them by their names such as IS / ISIL etc and calling them jihadists?
We and the media should be referring to them in the strongest derogatory terms. The French, in this instance, got it bang on by coining Daesh.
A propaganda war is every bit as important as bombing the c*nts to kingdom come.
bad company said:
BlackLabel said:
Or just refer to him by his real name - surely the spooks must be 100% sure about his identity by now.
Because that would probably lead to reprisals against his family who are probably innocent & respectable.Edited by BlackLabel on Monday 17th November 10:44
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff