Drifter convicted of dangerous driving

Drifter convicted of dangerous driving

Author
Discussion

Devil2575

13,400 posts

189 months

Monday 13th July 2015
quotequote all
md. said:
Don't know if this vid has been posted in a while.
Always comes to mind when Hartside is mentioned...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6WthVp8G10
The guy who posted it doesn't like some of the feedback he's getting! biggrin

eccles

13,747 posts

223 months

Monday 13th July 2015
quotequote all
Mike22233 said:
So it's ok for Chris Harris but not this guy?
Many of the TopGear road tests show dodgy driving on public roads as well.

martinbiz

3,175 posts

146 months

Monday 13th July 2015
quotequote all
Joeguard1990 said:
I blame his legal team if he had one.
All they had was a video with no number plates on the car and no way to identify the driver?
Except.......... as in his own words he thinks someone shopped him, so possibly a sworn statement saying who the driver was. He could of course tried to defend this by lying in court and committing perjury, but maybe someone with half a brain advised him not to unless he fancied a free holiday, courtesy of her Majesty.

Verdict - double cock

Bradley1500

766 posts

147 months

Tuesday 14th July 2015
quotequote all
What would have happened if the driver denied it was him?

The Police/CPS based their dangerous driving charge on the video evidence posted to Facebook and a report from an acquaintance of the driver. It sounds as if the person who reported him is keeping a low profile – so I’m guessing they wouldn’t have stood up in court and testified against him.

If the Police/CPS were just left with the video evidence would the charge of stood up in court? The video I viewed doesn’t clearly show a number plate nor the driver’s face, so I imagine he would have got off scot free.

I know he pleaded guilty, hence the conviction and penalties he received but if he had of been less honest would he have gotten away with it?

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 14th July 2015
quotequote all
Who knows? Who cares?

Besides, if this was a thread in NPE about Scrotey Sid getting off some beef by fibbing and/ or by dirty lawyer tricks, all would say OMG broken Britain. But here it's all "and I would have got away with it if not for those meddling, er .... facts.". Because motorist.

Bradley1500

766 posts

147 months

Tuesday 14th July 2015
quotequote all
I was asking to see people's thoughts and I care or I wouldn't of asked.

Obviously he was guilty as he decided to drift on the public road, but I feel if he hadn't of admitted the offence he wouldn't have been convicted.

AA999

5,180 posts

218 months

Tuesday 14th July 2015
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Who knows? Who cares?

Besides, if this was a thread in NPE about Scrotey Sid getting off some beef by fibbing and/ or by dirty lawyer tricks, all would say OMG broken Britain. But here it's all "and I would have got away with it if not for those meddling, er .... facts.". Because motorist.
To be fair though on those that do question certain things, I think its more of a dis-proportionality between punishments given out from courts to public whereby in one case you get crims planning an 'activity' that creates victims, damages and loss, and those that plan an 'activity' that has no victims or resultant consequences (that being damage to person or infrastructure).
Especially when the judge decides its going to be an 'example' case.


Mike22233

822 posts

112 months

Tuesday 14th July 2015
quotequote all
Wonder if this individual will get charged for dangerous driving

http://www.theladbible.com/articles/motorist-cause...

tapereel

Original Poster:

1,860 posts

117 months

Thursday 16th July 2015
quotequote all
This one has been sentenced today too:

Chester man filmed himself driving at breakneck speeds

Published date: 16 July 2015 |
Published by: Staff reporter

A 49-year-old man from Chester admitted dangerous driving after filming himself driving at breakneck speeds around Cheshire and North Wales with a terrified passenger.

Frederick Randles, 49, from Heath Bank in Chester was sentenced to nine months in prison suspended for two years at Chester Crown Court on 16 July 2015. He was also ordered to carry out 250 hours of unpaid work, was disqualified from driving for 18 months and has to take an extended test. He was also ordered to pay £2,000 costs.

He pleaded guilty to two counts of dangerous driving and one count of careless driving, but pleaded not guilty to three further counts of dangerous driving which the prosecution have agreed to lie on file.

In January 2014 North Wales Police, were alerted to numerous items of footage with different passengers which had been uploaded onto Youtube.

The footage showed an Ariel Atom car being driven dangerously along B5130 between Saighton, Holt and Farndon areas of Chester and Lake Brenig and Nant Y Garth in North Wales.

http://www.chesterstandard.co.uk/news/150384/chest...


carinaman

21,370 posts

173 months

Friday 17th July 2015
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Graduate, I thought, not student.
Article says he has a Masters in Engineering.

Mike22233

822 posts

112 months

Friday 17th July 2015
quotequote all
carinaman said:
Article says he has a Masters in Engineering.
So how does that mean he can't be a graduate?

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 17th July 2015
quotequote all
Mike22233 said:
So it's ok for Chris Harris but not this guy?
To be fair, CH is a cock too.

spikeyhead

17,413 posts

198 months

Friday 17th July 2015
quotequote all
tapereel said:
This one has been sentenced today too:

Chester man filmed himself driving at breakneck speeds

Published date: 16 July 2015 |
Published by: Staff reporter

A 49-year-old man from Chester admitted dangerous driving after filming himself driving at breakneck speeds around Cheshire and North Wales with a terrified passenger.

Frederick Randles, 49, from Heath Bank in Chester was sentenced to nine months in prison suspended for two years at Chester Crown Court on 16 July 2015. He was also ordered to carry out 250 hours of unpaid work, was disqualified from driving for 18 months and has to take an extended test. He was also ordered to pay £2,000 costs.

He pleaded guilty to two counts of dangerous driving and one count of careless driving, but pleaded not guilty to three further counts of dangerous driving which the prosecution have agreed to lie on file.

In January 2014 North Wales Police, were alerted to numerous items of footage with different passengers which had been uploaded onto Youtube.

The footage showed an Ariel Atom car being driven dangerously along B5130 between Saighton, Holt and Farndon areas of Chester and Lake Brenig and Nant Y Garth in North Wales.

http://www.chesterstandard.co.uk/news/150384/chest...
Having watched the video, it looks quite slow for what an Atom can do.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

189 months

Friday 17th July 2015
quotequote all
carinaman said:
Breadvan72 said:
Graduate, I thought, not student.
Article says he has a Masters in Engineering.
If he has a Masters in Engineering then he is a graduate.

tapereel

Original Poster:

1,860 posts

117 months

Friday 17th July 2015
quotequote all
spikeyhead said:
tapereel said:
This one has been sentenced today too:

Chester man filmed himself driving at breakneck speeds

Published date: 16 July 2015 |
Published by: Staff reporter

A 49-year-old man from Chester admitted dangerous driving after filming himself driving at breakneck speeds around Cheshire and North Wales with a terrified passenger.

Frederick Randles, 49, from Heath Bank in Chester was sentenced to nine months in prison suspended for two years at Chester Crown Court on 16 July 2015. He was also ordered to carry out 250 hours of unpaid work, was disqualified from driving for 18 months and has to take an extended test. He was also ordered to pay £2,000 costs.

He pleaded guilty to two counts of dangerous driving and one count of careless driving, but pleaded not guilty to three further counts of dangerous driving which the prosecution have agreed to lie on file.

In January 2014 North Wales Police, were alerted to numerous items of footage with different passengers which had been uploaded onto Youtube.

The footage showed an Ariel Atom car being driven dangerously along B5130 between Saighton, Holt and Farndon areas of Chester and Lake Brenig and Nant Y Garth in North Wales.

http://www.chesterstandard.co.uk/news/150384/chest...
Having watched the video, it looks quite slow for what an Atom can do.
Well it may well do as 112 does look slower than 170...but 112 in a 60 is not "quite slow" as the passenger willingly attested.

tapereel

Original Poster:

1,860 posts

117 months

Friday 17th July 2015
quotequote all
Devil2575 said:
carinaman said:
Breadvan72 said:
Graduate, I thought, not student.
Article says he has a Masters in Engineering.
If he has a Masters in Engineering then he is a graduate.
Twice

speedking31

3,566 posts

137 months

Friday 17th July 2015
quotequote all
Bradley1500 said:
I was asking to see people's thoughts and I care or I wouldn't of asked.

Obviously he was guilty as he decided to drift on the public road, but I feel if he hadn't of admitted the offence he wouldn't have been convicted.
there is probably some sticker or other identifying feature to show it's his car. Then, as the RK, he's asked to name the driver. Start lying then leads to a world of pain. Guilty, perjury or permitting others to drive while uninsured, etc.

carinaman

21,370 posts

173 months

Friday 17th July 2015
quotequote all
tapereel said:
Devil2575 said:
carinaman said:
Breadvan72 said:
Graduate, I thought, not student.
Article says he has a Masters in Engineering.
If he has a Masters in Engineering then he is a graduate.
Twice
Perhaps he should have got a Duetto.

Red Devil

13,071 posts

209 months

Friday 17th July 2015
quotequote all
speedking31 said:
Bradley1500 said:
I was asking to see people's thoughts and I care or I wouldn't of asked.

Obviously he was guilty as he decided to drift on the public road, but I feel if he hadn't of admitted the offence he wouldn't have been convicted.
there is probably some sticker or other identifying feature to show it's his car. Then, as the RK, he's asked to name the driver. Start lying then leads to a world of pain. Guilty, perjury or permitting others to drive while uninsured, etc.
Even with only the video as evidence, there are indeed several identifying features: ones which mark it out as a drift car. The sticker in the o/s/r window, the different colour rear quarter panel, and the vertical 'stitch mark' where it is attached near the rear light cluster to name but three. When you couple the panel with the different (mismatched) front and rear wheels you have the classic hallmark of a car which is used in competition.

Add in the fact that the way it being handled clearly points to a driver who is more than just your average chav 'boy racer' (I do wish ignorant media reporters could refrain from spouting such stereotypical emotive bcensoreds). That narrows down the list of potential suspects quite considerably. It doesn't take a degree in rocket science to work out where to start looking. As an experiment I did a methodical Google search without using his name, just the words drift and touge. I found him and his S14 in less than 30 minutes. All it would need is a police officer with some brains and an interest in cars to do likewise. Heck even the Keystone Cops might have managed it given a spare morning or afternoon!

Merely removing the front number plate (yet keeping the rear one rolleyes) was never going to guarantee anonymity. It also betrays the fact that the driver knew full well that what he was doing was contrary to the RTA 1988 and would have major consequences if he was found out. He needs to choose his friends more carefully as well. The twazzock who posted the vid on social media might as well have taken out a full page ad in the tabloids.

havoc

30,210 posts

236 months

Friday 17th July 2015
quotequote all
eccles said:
Mike22233 said:
So it's ok for Chris Harris but not this guy?
Many of the TopGear road tests show dodgy driving on public roads as well.
Exactly my thoughts. Add in the evo and Car magazine test-drivers where you regularly see images of / videos of crossed-up cars on public roads...and often can ID the road-tester.

Where's the difference? Same level of evidence, surely...


I would also state, for those on here castigating the poor sod, that there will be a LOT of people on here who've deliberately provoked their car on the road, the only difference being they didn't video it and host it. There but for the grace of god and all that...


So, how about we take the "let him who is without sin..." approach, m'kay?!?