Continuous Insurance Enforcement

Continuous Insurance Enforcement

Author
Discussion

Emma Patterson

769 posts

177 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
nigel_bytes said:
Another way of extracting money from car owners.

Millions of uninsured motorists have until the end of the year to buy appropriate cover or face an unprecedented crackdown from police and the courts – including fines of up to £1,000 – even if their vehicle is not being driven.

Plans published recently by the Department for Transport (DfT) will soon make it an offence purely to be the registered keeper of an uninsured vehicle, while police will not have to prove it was in use.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2010/jan/10/motor-...
They can get you even now if the car is not being used but is parked on a public road or in a public place to which the public have access. The courts interpret the word "use" to mean "have the oppotunity to use" so you don't have to be caught actually in the car or driving it. If the car is on private land then they have no argument, but they may have in the future. they are bringing in a new law that states that you can be done if you are the registered keeper of a car that doesn't have insurance.

If anyone gets caught not using their car then they may have a special reasons argument to avoid the points. Give me a shout if anyone wants to know more on that front. Its a nasty little offence 6-8 points even if you weren't caught driving.

EU_Foreigner

2,836 posts

228 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
oldsoak said:
EU_Foreigner said:
If the UK insurance racket was made the same as on the continent it would be so much easier. Over there, the car is insured - not the person.

So the case of the person his mum's / uncle's etc car and not being insured would not be possible then.
The car is insured over here too. That's what this is supposed to make sure happens in all cases where it should.
It means that 'Johnny Criminal' can't avoid paying insurance and just SORN his car and still use it on a road when he feels like it.
It does not stop the uninsured driver scenario though.

oldsoak

5,618 posts

204 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
EU_Foreigner said:
oldsoak said:
EU_Foreigner said:
If the UK insurance racket was made the same as on the continent it would be so much easier. Over there, the car is insured - not the person.

So the case of the person his mum's / uncle's etc car and not being insured would not be possible then.
The car is insured over here too. That's what this is supposed to make sure happens in all cases where it should.
It means that 'Johnny Criminal' can't avoid paying insurance and just SORN his car and still use it on a road when he feels like it.
It does not stop the uninsured driver scenario though.
True but we are not talking uninsured drivers we're talking uninsured cars/vehicles here.

saaby93

32,038 posts

180 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
oldsoak said:
The car is insured over here too. That's what this is supposed to make sure happens in all cases where it should.
It means that 'Johnny Criminal' can't avoid paying insurance and just SORN his car and still use it on a road when he feels like it.
Of course he can still use it, he'll open the door pop in the key and away wink

It's just a question of whether he can use it legally.
Before or after it's still illegal.


The new law's only to affect those who have their cars legally off road and unsinsured

SS2.

14,486 posts

240 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
The new law's only to affect those who have their cars legally off road and unsinsured
And to avoid falling foul of the forthcoming legislation, all they are required to do is make a SORN declaration (as may be required for expired VED).

saaby93

32,038 posts

180 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
SS2 said:
And to avoid falling foul of the forthcoming legislation, all they are required to do is make a SORN declaration (as may be required for expired VED).
I know that wink
But where's the 'win' for all the extra effort?

oldsoak

5,618 posts

204 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
oldsoak said:
The car is insured over here too. That's what this is supposed to make sure happens in all cases where it should.
It means that 'Johnny Criminal' can't avoid paying insurance and just SORN his car and still use it on a road when he feels like it.
Of course he can still use it, he'll open the door pop in the key and away wink

It's just a question of whether he can use it legally.
Before or after it's still illegal.


The new law's only to affect those who have their cars legally off road and unsinsured
I'm trying desperately hard to believe you ain't being deliberately obtuse here saaby. wink

You seem to be forgetting it also affects those who have a car off road on private property uninsured and SORN'ed but like to drive about in it regardless...which was illegal before but they needed to be actually CAUGHT driving it before they could be 'done'...now they don't have to be driving it to be prosecuted.
smile

Nick_F

10,154 posts

248 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
oldsoak said:
saaby93 said:
oldsoak said:
The car is insured over here too. That's what this is supposed to make sure happens in all cases where it should.
It means that 'Johnny Criminal' can't avoid paying insurance and just SORN his car and still use it on a road when he feels like it.
Of course he can still use it, he'll open the door pop in the key and away wink

It's just a question of whether he can use it legally.
Before or after it's still illegal.


The new law's only to affect those who have their cars legally off road and unsinsured
I'm trying desperately hard to believe you ain't being deliberately obtuse here saaby. wink

You seem to be forgetting it also affects those who have a car off road on private property uninsured and SORN'ed but like to drive about in it regardless...which was illegal before but they needed to be actually CAUGHT driving it before they could be 'done'...now they don't have to be driving it to be prosecuted.
smile
Eh? If SORN in place then no prosecution unless you get 'CAUGHT driving...'

saaby93

32,038 posts

180 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
oldsoak said:
I'm trying desperately hard to believe you ain't being deliberately obtuse here saaby. wink

You seem to be forgetting it also affects those who have a car off road on private property uninsured and SORN'ed but like to drive about in it regardless...which was illegal before but they needed to be actually CAUGHT driving it before they could be 'done'...now they don't have to be driving it to be prosecuted.
smile
not being obtuse, just testing how it will play out. All they'll have to do is register it SORN and use it.

oldsoak

5,618 posts

204 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
oldsoak said:
I'm trying desperately hard to believe you ain't being deliberately obtuse here saaby. wink

You seem to be forgetting it also affects those who have a car off road on private property uninsured and SORN'ed but like to drive about in it regardless...which was illegal before but they needed to be actually CAUGHT driving it before they could be 'done'...now they don't have to be driving it to be prosecuted.
smile
not being obtuse, just testing how it will play out. All they'll have to do is register it SORN and use it.
Christ on a bike...They do that now.... but up until now if that car was kept on private property Plod had to catch them using it...now they don't...geddit yet?

EU_Foreigner

2,836 posts

228 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
I know what you are saying about the getting caught when using it, but why make a half hearted law when you could catch all with a proper system of "car insurance" rather then "person insurance"?

oldsoak

5,618 posts

204 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
EU_Foreigner said:
I know what you are saying about the getting caught when using it, but why make a half hearted law when you could catch all with a proper system of "car insurance" rather then "person insurance"?
I'm not going around that particular roundabout again.

Richard C

1,685 posts

259 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
oldsoak said:
smile

At the moment you have to be caught driving an uninsured vehicle.
Since when are vehicles insured. rolleyes At the moment a policy may be bought that entitles a driver sometimes including others to drive a vehicle. I am permitted to drive another's vehicle that carries a current tax disk on my insurance.

saaby93

32,038 posts

180 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
oldsoak said:
Christ on a bike...They do that now.... but up until now if that car was kept on private property Plod had to catch them using it...now they don't...geddit yet?
how do they get them for having a SORNed car off road?
Surely they have to catch them usng it on road = same as now

oldsoak

5,618 posts

204 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
Richard C said:
oldsoak said:
smile

At the moment you have to be caught driving an uninsured vehicle.
Since when are vehicles insured. rolleyes At the moment a policy may be bought that entitles a driver sometimes including others to drive a vehicle. I am permitted to drive another's vehicle that carries a current tax disk on my insurance.
I'd look at my policy again if I were you...
http://www.life-assurance-bureau.co.uk/car-insuran...
smile

oldsoak

5,618 posts

204 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
oldsoak said:
Christ on a bike...They do that now.... but up until now if that car was kept on private property Plod had to catch them using it...now they don't...geddit yet?
how do they get them for having a SORNed car off road?
Surely they have to catch them usng it on road = same as now
Now I know you're being obtuse...THEY DON'T get them for having a SORNed car off road....they 'get' them for having an UNINSURED SORN'ed car.
I'm taking the dog out for some fresh air before I blow a fuse biggrin

Noger

7,117 posts

251 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
EU_Foreigner said:
I know what you are saying about the getting caught when using it, but why make a half hearted law when you could catch all with a proper system of "car insurance" rather then "person insurance"?
Like the Jersey WID ? Still doesn't insure the vehicle, just shows that someone has insured it.

Much like the french vingette, the idea that this confers insurance to any driver is incorrect.

Nick_F

10,154 posts

248 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
oldsoak said:
saaby93 said:
oldsoak said:
Christ on a bike...They do that now.... but up until now if that car was kept on private property Plod had to catch them using it...now they don't...geddit yet?
how do they get them for having a SORNed car off road?
Surely they have to catch them usng it on road = same as now
Now I know you're being obtuse...THEY DON'T get them for having a SORNed car off road....they 'get' them for having an UNINSURED SORN'ed car.
I'm taking the dog out for some fresh air before I blow a fuse biggrin
I repeat: under the new rules someone who has declared SORN will still have to be caught driving in order to be prosecuted. No change.

saaby93

32,038 posts

180 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
oldsoak said:
Now I know you're being obtuse...THEY DON'T get them for having a SORNed car off road....they 'get' them for having an UNINSURED SORN'ed car.
It says they'll be exempt if uninsured and SORNed
It said:
Implementation of the new rules in 2011 will allow those drivers who are not currently using their cars, and have left them uninsured for one year, to seek exemption by sorting out off-road storage and make a "statutory off-road notification" (Sorn). They will then also be exempted from vehicle tax. Those who already have a Sorn in place can continue to use this.
oldsoak said:
I'm taking the dog out for some fresh air before I blow a fuse biggrin
feet up coffee

BigBob

1,471 posts

227 months

Tuesday 12th January 2010
quotequote all
So, am I right in thinking that if you fail to SORN or forget to renew SORN you'll not only get the demand for £80.00 but also a fine/points for no insurance?


BB