Not wearing a seatbelt...

Author
Discussion

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

219 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
So, are you objecting to wearing seatbelts, or objecting to being told you haveto?

Jspesh

796 posts

218 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
When I do some shopping in tescos and drive round to the petrol station at 10-15mph, I don't bother with my seatbelt. Any other time I wear it though.

Flat in Fifth

44,352 posts

253 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
I'm quite calm thanks.

To precis. You keep talking about high speed impacts where, yes, some of the injuries can come from the seatbelt.

How about lower speed collisions? Many more of those I would suspect.

Yes in an ideal world HMG should educate educate educate, but I thought they tried that with Jimmy S and clunk click. If education doesn't work and people are not making informed decisions then should compulsion and enforcement automatically follow is what I believe you are really asking.

Possibly, the problem is with so many things that the devil is in the detail.

Julian64

14,317 posts

256 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
The legislation provides for a number of specific exemptions from the seat belt wearing requirements on medical and other grounds. Please consult your doctor if you think you should not wear a seat belt on medical grounds.
As for the others these include:-

"(b) the driver of or a passenger in a motor vehicle constructed or adapted for carrying goods, while on a journey which does not exceed 50 metres and which is undertaken for the purpose of delivering or collecting any thing;

(c) a person driving a vehicle while performing a manoeuvre which includes reversing;

(d) a qualified driver (within the meaning given by regulation 9 of the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1987) who is supervising the holder of a provisional licence (within the meaning of Part III of the Act) while that holder is performing a manoeuvre which includes reversing;

(e) a person by whom, as provided in the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1987, a test of competence to drive is being conducted and his wearing a seat belt would endanger himself or any other person;

(f) a person driving or riding in a vehicle while it is being used for fire brigade or police purposes or for carrying a person in lawful custody (a person who is being so carried being included in this exemption);

(g) the driver of—
(i) a licensed taxi while it is being used for seeking hire, or answering a call for hire, or carrying a passenger for hire, or
(ii) a private hire vehicle while it is being used to carry a passenger for hire;

(h) a person riding in a vehicle, being used under a trade licence, for the purpose of investigating or remedying a mechanical fault in the vehicle;

(j) a disabled person who is wearing a disabled person's belt; or

(k) a person riding in a vehicle while it is taking part in a procession organised by or on behalf of the Crown."


Well if thats all the highway code says, why am I looking at a pad of seatbelt wearing exemption certificates?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

272 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
Top line Julian.

Please consult your Doctor...