Hardwood found not guilty
Discussion
La Liga said:
Forgive me for not trusting someone making a conclusion without having access to the necessary information and data to actually form such a conclusion.
Unless he has access to the prosecution file and was at the trial, then I'll add a little more weight to him saying the CPS should review the case again.
Do you have such access?Unless he has access to the prosecution file and was at the trial, then I'll add a little more weight to him saying the CPS should review the case again.
Can I quash one canard - the standard of proof for an Inquest finding of unlawful killing is the same as the criminal standard.
Note also that burden of proof and standard of proof are not the same thing. Burden indicates which party has to prove something. Standard indicates the level to which a thing has to be proved.
Note also that burden of proof and standard of proof are not the same thing. Burden indicates which party has to prove something. Standard indicates the level to which a thing has to be proved.
Breadvan72 said:
Can I quash one canard - the standard of proof for an Inquest finding of unlawful killing is the same as the criminal standard.
Note also that burden of proof and standard of proof are not the same thing. Burden indicates which party has to prove something. Standard indicates the level to which a thing has to be proved.
Thank you. I had not realised that (it wasn't part of the Law Society Finals or the Law Tripos!). Note also that burden of proof and standard of proof are not the same thing. Burden indicates which party has to prove something. Standard indicates the level to which a thing has to be proved.
PS wouldn't you shoot down a canard? (It would probably make better eating than a quashed one)
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff