Sun Letters - Speed Cams Kill

Sun Letters - Speed Cams Kill

Author
Discussion

maxrider

Original Poster:

2,481 posts

237 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all

[quote=The Sun]
Caught out ... speed camera

ROAD deaths have soared in areas where MORE speed cameras have been installed, an investigation by Motorcycle News has revealed.

In North Wales – where 56,247 speeding tickets were issued – deaths rose by 18 per cent, yet in Durham – where there are no Gatso cameras – deaths fell by a quarter.

Readers are appalled.




NOW we know speed cameras claim more lives than they are supposed to save.

Contrary to what some think, practically all motorists are sensible and drive at speeds appropriate to road conditions at the time — often well UNDER the speed limit.

With cameras about, there is a tendency to drive UP to the speed limit regardless of road conditions, particularly if drivers think they might be holding up cars behind



CHRIS SHIPP
Kingsbridge, Devon


NOW it has been shown that speed cameras do little or nothing for road safety, can we expect all the so-called “safety camera partnerships” to stop pretending?

How about having all their vans simply labelled “tax collectors”. At least it would be honest.

We would all support cameras if they were highly visible and slowed the traffic — but if they did that they would not make any money.


GEORGE EDWARDS
Harrogate, North Yorks


MANY drivers have got into the habit of braking sharply just before they reach speed cameras and then putting their foot down once they have passed.

Others are too busy looking at their speedometers to pay attention to the road. Speed kills but so do dangerous practices like these.


MATTHEW MORRISON
Walsall, West Midlands


IF the only reason speed cameras were installed was to cut deaths, this new evidence shows they must be taken down. Motorists are penalised enough as it is.


ANNA MORTON
Gravesend, Kent


I AM not surprised that camera partnerships are refusing to remove speed cams even though they have been proved to cause more road deaths.

In London, the head of the ambulance service revealed speed humps were killing 500 people a year by delaying the emergency services.

Proper evidence from a top professional — but what did the London Assembly do? Attacked him for speaking out.
That’s how these fanatics deal with facts.


MARTIN JONES
Southall, West London


ALTHOUGH road fatalities are terrible but inevitable, I can not wait for the police explanation for the recent findings.

No one could ever be convinced that this plague on our nation was for anything else other than raising revenue.

All drivers convicted of marginally exceeding speed limits, where no danger has been caused to any other road user, should have penalty points removed from their licences and fines refunded from the vast amount of cash generated.


PETER FITZPATRICK
Accrington, Lancs


THE SUN’S editorial sums up the main reason for more speed cam-related accidents — people jamming on their brakes.

It would be cheaper for careless, irresponsible speeders to pay attention to the road instead of spending their time looking for the camera.


MIKE HARVEY
Redditch, Worcs


WHAT is particularly worrying is that deaths of child pedestrians have increased, giving Britain one of the worst records in Europe.

Research shows that 85 per cent of pedestrians hit at 40mph will die, 45 per cent at 30mph but only five per cent at 20mph.

The Government needs to look at other ways to make our roads safer for kids.

Children’s charity NCH and End Child Poverty are campaigning for more 20mph zones around schools and built-up areas.

This is an effective way of reducing child pedestrian accidents and making our roads safer.


GEORGE McNAMARA
NCH Policy Officer, London


WE all know that Gatsos are a form of extra tax on the motorist.

The Government can not really grab any more money from motorists through fuel tax because of the high oil price — so they allow the authorities to put these speed cameras up.


JAMIE LUCAS
Farnborough, Hants


WE are all creatures of habit and soon get to know where the mechanical spies are. Even when driving on unfamiliar roads, the sudden increase in brake lights gives the game away.

The only way that speed cams will cut accidents is to move them around, keeping them inconspicuous.


GRAHAM DIXON
Preston, Lancs
[/quote]

"Some" good responses here, but unfortunately the press still seem to be picking letters from the lentilists and the 'speed kills' brigade as if they formed a significant proportion of the population...
They don't :rolleyes:

Mike Harvey/Graham Dixon - you are f:censored:g numpties.

George McNamara...'The Government needs to look at other ways to make our roads safer for kids.'

Three words... 'Green..Cross..Code' you tw@t

KB_S1

5,967 posts

230 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all
One guys letter said:

"WE are all creatures of habit and soon get to know where the mechanical spies are. Even when driving on unfamiliar roads, the sudden increase in brake lights gives the game away.

The only way that speed cams will cut accidents is to move them around, keeping them inconspicuous."

And how exactly will this help? if you don't know the camera is there then how will it slow someone down?

Wish these people would think a bit more, cameras have no real use other than revenue.

scorp

8,783 posts

230 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all
KB_S1 said:

And how exactly will this help? if you don't know the camera is there then how will it slow someone down?

Wish these people would think a bit more, cameras have no real use other than revenue.


Well, the camera serves to punish not prevent you from speeding. It is a deterrent to encourage you not to speed a second time.

The only real way to prevent people speeding, is to fit some kind of engine limiter and gps or similiar tracking. This would of course be a total disaster.

gone

6,649 posts

264 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all
Most worrying is that these are the views of Sun readers!

'The Sun' readers forum ilustrated with pictures that reflect the sort of mentality/views that eminates from such a well informed section of the public

WildCat

8,369 posts

244 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all
Perhaps Mr Dixon ist working for the lancs Prats...und Sun newspaper ist about level of his intelligence

7db

6,058 posts

231 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all
It is common practice in some publications to write ones own letters for the letters page, in order to voice extreme views that the publication couldn't voice. I couldn't possibly say whether the Sun does this.

scorp

8,783 posts

230 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all
7db said:
It is common practice in some publications to write ones own letters for the letters page, in order to voice extreme views that the publication couldn't voice. I couldn't possibly say whether the Sun does this.


You mean 'Dear Diedre' isn't real?

gone

6,649 posts

264 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all
scorp said:

7db said:
It is common practice in some publications to write ones own letters for the letters page, in order to voice extreme views that the publication couldn't voice. I couldn't possibly say whether the Sun does this.



You mean 'Dear Diedre' isn't real?


I think Diedre is real. Maybe she has a vivid imagination
How does she manage to get those spy cameras into so many peoples homes who have relationship problems?
Why are they always beautiful people?
Why does the Trisha show not have the same people as in Diedres photo problem?

They should come to where I work and see some of the munters I have to deal with who shag each others lives apart.

james_j

3,996 posts

256 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all
Jeremy Clarkson highlighted these facts last Sunday on Top Gear.

I just hope other publications and media have the good sense to publish this. Far more have been killed in just a few weeks because of this obsession with speed than have been killed in the recent bombings; and the camera lovers / car haters still pursue their twisted agenda...it's a disgrace.