Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
2 3
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

muckymotor

Original Poster:

989 posts

90 months

[news] 
Sunday 17th June 2012 quote quote all
As I've just become the proud owner of a Volvo V70 tank I've been paying more attention than normal to other Volvos. There's been a large Volvo meet this weekend at Thoresby Hall so I've seen more than usual as the venue isn't too far away from me.

Earlier today I passed an S60 with a pair of blue reflectors stuck to the rear bumper, something like these



Legal or not as I'm sure at night they will pretty much look like blue lights when car headlights pick them out? It struck me as the same sort of thing that some horse riders and bikers do with the lookalike police clothing but even sadder.

magpie215

1,908 posts

58 months

[news] 
Sunday 17th June 2012 quote quote all
I would imagine you would fall foul of lighting regs with those fitted.

Flibble

1,037 posts

50 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
Prohibited by Road Vehicles Lighting Regulations:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1989/1796/regul...
RVLR said:
No vehicle shall be fitted with a lamp which is capable of showing any light to the rear, other than a red light, except–

<Various exemptions none of which apply to private cars>
#

Edit: also in the same regulations:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1989/1796/regul...

RVLR said:
No vehicle, other than an emergency vehicle, shall be fitted with–
(a)a blue warning beacon or special warning lamp, or
(b)a device which resembles a blue warning beacon or a special warning lamp, whether the same is in working order or not.
Edited by Flibble on Monday 18th June 00:14

Pontoneer

2,550 posts

55 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
The exemptions permitting amber direction indicators , white reversing lamps and white number plates all apply to private cars .

Nothing in the link specifically prohibits the reflectors shown above .

Gareth79

2,620 posts

115 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
Pontoneer said:
The exemptions permitting amber direction indicators , white reversing lamps and white number plates all apply to private cars .

Nothing in the link specifically prohibits the reflectors shown above .
Blue reflectors are not specifically prohibited, no, but they are prohibited by the blanket prohibition of lamps showing anything but red to the rear, except the exemptions (NB: a reflector is a "lamp"). The second one, that it could look like a special warning lamp would be more work to prosecute, but it would most likely succeed.

Re. private cars: I'm sure he was referring to 2. (h) and (k) which permit certain vehicles to show blue light to the rear.


Edited by Gareth79 on Monday 18th June 00:51

Advertisement

0a

8,434 posts

63 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
Legal or not these must be in the "top 10 guaranteed to get you pulled over every time" list!

Crossflow Kid

4,615 posts

60 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
muckymotor said:
It struck me as the same sort of thing that some horse riders and bikers do with the lookalike police clothing but even sadder.
Yeah, pretty sad......being seen.

GC8

9,528 posts

59 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
I was always under the impression that blue retro-reflective material was prohibited too, although Im struggling to find anything to back that up (now that other summaries/links have disappeared).

Pontoneer

2,550 posts

55 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
I , too , would have expected them to be illegal , but reading the regs above see nothing definitive .

I also am not so sure about a reflector being a lamp - clearly , a lamp emits light by itself but a reflector can only reflect light which falls on it from an external source - the two are not the same .

Everything reflects light to a greater or lesser degree and , it could be argued , that 'clear over base' metallic type paintwork is retro reflective - are we therefore going to outlaw blue metallic paintwork in case it looks like a blue light under some circumstances ?

Better to start with blue-looking headlamps and those annoying blue neon washer jets some people have .

Crossflow Kid

4,615 posts

60 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
Thought steady blue was ok, if not entirely sensible, whilst it's flashing/storbing blue which is naughty, hence the proliferation of ickle blue LED washer jets.

chriscpritchard

232 posts

34 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
Pontoneer said:
I , too , would have expected them to be illegal , but reading the regs above see nothing definitive .

I also am not so sure about a reflector being a lamp - clearly , a lamp emits light by itself but a reflector can only reflect light which falls on it from an external source - the two are not the same .

Everything reflects light to a greater or lesser degree and , it could be argued , that 'clear over base' metallic type paintwork is retro reflective - are we therefore going to outlaw blue metallic paintwork in case it looks like a blue light under some circumstances ?

Better to start with blue-looking headlamps and those annoying blue neon washer jets some people have .
you could argue it "resembles a blue warning beacon or a special warning lamp, whether the same is in working order or not." and so falls foul of the regs.

GC8

9,528 posts

59 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
Retro reflective material and reflectors are regarded as being one in the same thing, and reflectors are covered under the Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations 1989.

Its all far from clear, though.

SS2.

7,383 posts

107 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
muckymotor said:
Earlier today I passed an S60 with a pair of blue reflectors stuck to the rear bumper, something like these

The lighting regulations provide that rear retro reflectors must be red in colour.

daz3210

5,000 posts

109 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
It couldn't have been an unmarked car could it?

Pontoneer

2,550 posts

55 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
chriscpritchard said:
you could argue it "resembles a blue warning beacon or a special warning lamp, whether the same is in working order or not." and so falls foul of the regs.
Indeed you could ; the matter would have to be decided in court .

XDA

1,826 posts

54 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
Sure it wasn't an unmarked police car?

Or perhpas just one of the usual volvo driving knobs who try and pretend they are in an unmarked car?

muckymotor

Original Poster:

989 posts

90 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
Definately not an unmarked car, too old and had a tow bar.

Interesting replies though.

XDA

1,826 posts

54 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
muckymotor said:
Definately not an unmarked car, too old and had a tow bar.
Just a knob then. There's only one reason why someone would put a blue reflector on the rear of their car...

ThunderSpook

1,412 posts

80 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
Crossflow Kid said:
Thought steady blue was ok, if not entirely sensible, whilst it's flashing/storbing blue which is naughty, hence the proliferation of ickle blue LED washer jets.
No, they are also totally illegal.

daz3210

5,000 posts

109 months

[news] 
Monday 18th June 2012 quote quote all
If someone were to have blue lights on my car for some legitimate purpose off road, what would they have to do when on the road? Cover them?

I'm thinking something like a rescue vehicle used at a racetrack.

2 3
Reply to Topic