Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

g3org3y

Original Poster:

6,839 posts

60 months

[news] 
Friday 20th July 2012 quote quote all
Just wondering how much of case could be made.

Just driving into London this evening. Off the lights gave the old E30 some beans, prob doing 45ish but autobox was holding the revs coupled with blowing back box making the car sound loud.

Out steps a police officer in a luminous vest, asked me to pull over 'for a chat'.

Pulled over at the next street to find 2x police vans, multiple police officers and some other pulled over drivers! (Apparently there was some operation going on that evening).

Of course, proceeded to get a telling off (probably rightly so) for 'excessive speed', as well as the usual questions regarding car ownership, insurance etc. He also checked all the tyres.

Anyway, he stated that since I seemed a nice chap (obviously doesn't really know me) and suitably apologetic he'll let me off.

My question is - without a speed gun rating what offence could you be charged with since apart from looking (and sounding) as though you were going quickly there's no objective/recorded evidence.

- Is 'excessive speed' (of unknown quantity) a possible offence?
- Perhaps it would be driving without due care?

Just wondering, thanks smile

mrmr96

11,955 posts

73 months

[news] 
Friday 20th July 2012 quote quote all
g3org3y said:
Just wondering how much of case could be made.

Just driving into London this evening. Off the lights gave the old E30 some beans, prob doing 45ish but autobox was holding the revs coupled with blowing back box making the car sound loud.

Out steps a police officer in a luminous vest, asked me to pull over 'for a chat'.

Pulled over at the next street to find 2x police vans, multiple police officers and some other pulled over drivers! (Apparently there was some operation going on that evening).

Of course, proceeded to get a telling off (probably rightly so) for 'excessive speed', as well as the usual questions regarding car ownership, insurance etc. He also checked all the tyres.

Anyway, he stated that since I seemed a nice chap (obviously doesn't really know me) and suitably apologetic he'll let me off.

My question is - without a speed gun rating what offence could you be charged with since apart from looking (and sounding) as though you were going quickly there's no objective/recorded evidence.

- Is 'excessive speed' (of unknown quantity) a possible offence?
- Perhaps it would be driving without due care?

Just wondering, thanks smile
You could be charged with speeding, as an officers opinion is (can be) sufficient evidence.

Fastdruid

1,218 posts

21 months

[news] 
Friday 20th July 2012 quote quote all
In a 30 you can be 'done' by the opinion of two officers (although slight legal technicality that they have to see you at the same time).

No measurements, timing, radar, laser or anything else is required.

g3org3y

Original Poster:

6,839 posts

60 months

[news] 
Friday 20th July 2012 quote quote all
mrmr96 said:
You could be charged with speeding, as an officers opinion is (can be) sufficient evidence.
Fair enough. It was a fair pull, I was being bit of a tt (but I do think the car sounds faster than it is!).

I did engage one of the other officer about the car, we actually had a decent chat about it in the time the other officer was checking the insurance details etc.

vonhosen

27,136 posts

86 months

[news] 
Friday 20th July 2012 quote quote all
You picked a great place, what with there being hardly any Police in London at the moment.
Advertisement

Red 4

1,359 posts

56 months

[news] 
Friday 20th July 2012 quote quote all
In answer to your question...

1 officer plus corroboration.

Which means the opinion of another officer or by means of an approved device (laser, etc.)

streaky

18,235 posts

118 months

[news] 
Saturday 21st July 2012 quote quote all
Red 4 said:
In answer to your question...

1 officer plus corroboration.

Which means the opinion of another officer or by means of an approved device (laser, etc.)
FWIW in context, except on Motorways, where no corroboration is required by virtue of s17 RTRA 1984.

Streaky

Dwight VanDriver

6,388 posts

113 months

[news] 
Saturday 21st July 2012 quote quote all
Con andf Use regs ?

Avoidance of excessive noise

97. No motor vehicle shall be used on a road in such manner as to cause any excessive noise which could have been avoided by the exercise of reasonable care on the part of the driver.

dvd

liner33

3,662 posts

71 months

[news] 
Saturday 21st July 2012 quote quote all
A friend of mine got a s59 because it "sounded like he was speeding" , the officer couldnt see him as he was at least 1/4 of a mile away

g3org3y

Original Poster:

6,839 posts

60 months

[news] 
Saturday 21st July 2012 quote quote all
Red 4 said:
In answer to your question...

1 officer plus corroboration.

Which means the opinion of another officer or by means of an approved device (laser, etc.)
In this instance, there was only one officer that saw/heard me pulling me over. The rest were round the corner on another street (and to my knowledge there was no speed recording device).

ben5732

323 posts

25 months

[news] 
Saturday 21st July 2012 quote quote all
Goold old E30s.... Had exactly the same with mine, got a ticking off that was all.

jazzyjeff

3,504 posts

128 months

[news] 
Saturday 21st July 2012 quote quote all
vonhosen said:
You picked a great place, what with there being hardly any Police in London at the moment.
rofl

eldar

6,995 posts

65 months

[news] 
Saturday 21st July 2012 quote quote all
vonhosen said:
You picked a great place, what with there being hardly any Police in London at the moment.
Thought London was full of police, mostly from elsewhere. Overtime, seeing as G4S is paying? smile

Tonsko

2,549 posts

84 months

[news] 
Saturday 21st July 2012 quote quote all
eldar said:
vonhosen said:
You picked a great place, what with there being hardly any Police in London at the moment.
Thought London was full of police, mostly from elsewhere. Overtime, seeing as G4S is paying? smile

Reply to Topic