Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
2 3
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

andymc

Original Poster:

1,036 posts

77 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
Just had mum on the phone, she was involved in a very light bump at the roundabout, she basically rear ended someone, broken number plate etc, very little damage, the car she bumped was an old S reg banger, anyway she offered to settle without the insurance being involved, he wasnt having it and said this was the 4th time this had happened to him, him, his wife and child in the car, mum now thinking its a scam of some kind due to all the horror stories etc, very little she can do is there? except wait
Andymc

daz3210

5,000 posts

110 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
Maybe try and get the Police to record it, but if there are no reported injuries they may not.


10 Pence Short

27,918 posts

87 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
Your mum crashed into someone else and wanted to avoid insurance, and she thinks the other side are scamming her?


C.A.R.

1,290 posts

58 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
Unfortunately you can't have a 'minor bump' in this day and age.

The driver and any other passengers no doubt have chronic whiplash and are requesting to go through insurance, collect £2,000 a head and pass go.

And no, there's nothing you can do about it.

joe_90

3,387 posts

101 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
andymc said:
Just had mum on the phone, she was involved in a very light bump at the roundabout, she basically rear ended someone, broken number plate etc, very little damage, the car she bumped was an old S reg banger, anyway she offered to settle without the insurance being involved, he wasnt having it and said this was the 4th time this had happened to him, him, his wife and child in the car, mum now thinking its a scam of some kind due to all the horror stories etc, very little she can do is there? except wait
Andymc
Dare we ask the question.....?
And was it her fault? or did the car just stop?
Advertisement

joe_90

3,387 posts

101 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
10 Pence Short said:
Your mum crashed into someone else and wanted to avoid insurance, and she thinks the other side are scamming her?
ffs 10ps.. you can be an arse sometimes.. a broken fking number plate on an old S reg.. Yep.. put that thru the insurance..

10 Pence Short

27,918 posts

87 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
joe_90 said:
10 Pence Short said:
Your mum crashed into someone else and wanted to avoid insurance, and she thinks the other side are scamming her?
ffs 10ps.. you can be an arse sometimes.. a broken fking number plate on an old S reg.. Yep.. put that thru the insurance..
Someone once stopped dead on me after they pulled out from a junction right in front of me and I gesticulated, in their words to "teach me a lesson". There was a minor collision, which made a small scuff on the rear bumper of his 3 Series.

When he got his car to the garage, the car had taken on £2500 of structural damage.

I learned two lessons- don't assumed there isn't damage just because it isn't obvious and don't gesticulate to other drivers.


StottyZr

4,194 posts

33 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
Probably shouldn't be said on the internet... But, to forgo the imminent fraudulent whiplash claims, couldn't she simply deny it ever happened?

joe_90

3,387 posts

101 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
10 Pence Short said:
joe_90 said:
10 Pence Short said:
Your mum crashed into someone else and wanted to avoid insurance, and she thinks the other side are scamming her?
ffs 10ps.. you can be an arse sometimes.. a broken fking number plate on an old S reg.. Yep.. put that thru the insurance..
Someone once stopped dead on me after they pulled out from a junction right in front of me and I gesticulated, in their words to "teach me a lesson". There was a minor collision, which made a small scuff on the rear bumper of his 3 Series.

When he got his car to the garage, the car had taken on £2500 of structural damage.

I learned two lessons- don't assumed there isn't damage just because it isn't obvious and don't gesticulate to other drivers.
On the other hand, my wife has done the same, and had 2 vans crash into her car (both leaving dents), both times we told the drivers not to worry about it, and when my wife hit a car, we paid for the scratch to be fixed (£100).. and that was that.. karma I guess .

As with the 3 series, I have a 3 series track car, and taken it to bits quite a lot, god knows how you did 2.5K of chassis damage to that with a small scratch.

10 Pence Short

27,918 posts

87 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
The hit was right in the middle of the rear bumper. My Accord had plenty of visible damage to the front, but in the 3 series the rear boot floor had crumpled out of sight.

My overarching point in this thread was that you cannot assume because someone wants to go through insurance that they are trying a scam. Placed in a similar situation I would insist on getting the insurance details the other driver is legally obliged to give me. If it turned out the damage (including any potential injury to passengers) could be dealt with outside of insurance, then by all means settle it that way once the liability can be quantified.

We get plenty of threads in here where people complain about other parties who initially agreed to go outside of insurance, then change their minds later once the damage is known. I would prefer to avoid that situation where possible.

daz3210

5,000 posts

110 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
Wonder if the third party would change their tune if they were told their car was to be written off.


Silver

4,052 posts

96 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
10 Pence Short said:
Your mum crashed into someone else and wanted to avoid insurance, and she thinks the other side are scamming her?
Suggesting not going through the insurance if the other driver is agreeable is hardly a scam.

HustleRussell

4,214 posts

30 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
10 Pence Short said:
Your mum crashed into someone else and wanted to avoid insurance, and she thinks the other side are scamming her?
Your joking right? this is a classic scam... brake test someone who is following too close/not paying attention, they go into the back of you, it is automatically the following driver's fault, rear ended 'victim' claims a fortune in personal injury/expenses etc.
Engage brain before posting.
And yes, some common sense must be applied when considering settling up privately vs insurance. The most minor crashes are often £500+. Last time I read about it, the average repair cost for an insurance repair was about £1,400.

10 Pence Short

27,918 posts

87 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
Crashing into the back of people at roundabout is a classic accident.

From the post above we have no evidence the victim is trying to scam the OP's mother. We do have evidence that his mother crashed into his vehicle and is liable for her negligence.

Instead of me getting real, maybe those who like to run around making unfounded allegations and assumptions should put their brains in gear before posting?

Silver

4,052 posts

96 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
I was once caught out like this, though I don't think it was an actual scam but simple opportunism on the other driver's part.

In 1996, I rear-ended a 10 year old battered Fiesta at a busy roundabout. It was totally my fault - he started to move off, I moved forward while looking right only to find that he'd changed his mind and stopped. It was no more than a gentle nudge. He got out and told me there was no damage but we exchanged numbers anyway. Next thing I know, his mate is calling me to say there's £700 worth of damage to the Fiesta and when am I sending a cheque.

I passed it straight to the insurance company, and both they and the assessor were convinced he was trying to pull a fast one but had no proof. By the time the car was assessed there was a hefty dent in the back but still no corresponding damage on mine. They did pay out but only about £150, IIRC.

Having also been in an accident with a driver who reversed into me then tried to claim I drove into them (and who I suspect was uninsured). They wanted to settle up privately but then started playing silly buggers. I also had problems with a former work colleague who scraped my car in the office car park, tried to pretend he hadn't despite numerous witnesses, then quibbled about the repair cost.

So basically now, I'd always just go straight to the insurance company.

williredale

1,244 posts

22 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
You'd have thought the other driver would have thought about what they were doing to cause so many people to crash into them. Maybe after the second time it happened rather than the fourth? Perhaps he likes being bummed by insurance premiums?

Prizam

241 posts

11 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
Unfortunately, even if this is a scam. Its still your Mum's fault.

She should have left enough room to stop in time, even if the person in front was to initiate a random emergency stop.

Your Mum can offer to pay the damages through her insurance company, meaning that although there is a "Claim", she wont loose her NCB etc...

That said, if there is a stupid whiplash claim she might just want to let insurance deal with it.

The only way to prove anything is to have a camera continently recording in your car. Something that is seemingly becoming an unnecessary evil in this day and age.

HustleRussell

4,214 posts

30 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
10PS- none of us were there, and we have only the briefest description of what happened. Contrary to what you said in a previous post, there is a risk that some sort of scam is involved and if the crasher's gut feeling is that the third party is dodgy, she's the only one to judge.
That said, it probably is no scam and from my past experiences I'd be reluctant to accept a private settlement unles the damage was very minor.

P.S. my poor little brain is permanently in overdrive.

andymc

Original Poster:

1,036 posts

77 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
thanks guys, time will tell and I will update as soon as i know, the man stopped in the middle of the roundabout

spikey78

136 posts

51 months

[news] 
Thursday 20th September 2012 quote quote all
I hate to say it, but be prepared to have your piss boiled.. Recently had a broadly similar shunt-literally 1mph, no damage to either car, took loads of photos etc.. Next thing got a call from a claims handling company resulting in my insurance co giving the tt £3200.. Nice work if you can get it
2 3
Reply to Topic