best way to sell R300 at moment ?

best way to sell R300 at moment ?

Author
Discussion

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

205 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
Never driven an SV but i have sat in one and i prefer the narrow car to sit in.

Why is hard to explain but an american magazine compared a caterham to a few others and had a tiny wee throw away comment which sums up a narrow car perfectly.

"You don't drive a caterham you wear it"

Fat Arnie

1,655 posts

264 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
Dino, I've driven both - same spec in terms of engine, gearbox, wheels/tyres etc etc. Whats more I drove two cars of each type, back to back 5 mins apart.

The SV is dynamically no match.

darth_pies

697 posts

218 months

Tuesday 15th July 2008
quotequote all
Fat Arnie said:
Dino, I've driven both - same spec in terms of engine, gearbox, wheels/tyres etc etc. Whats more I drove two cars of each type, back to back 5 mins apart.

The SV is dynamically no match.
That depends on your definition of 'dynamics'.

The SV is more stable and has more grip. In it's own right it's an excellent chassis and a slightly less frenetic drive. The extra interior and boot space also make it a better bet for touring.

Some of the staff at Caterham own SV's and they get to drive every car in the range.....so they can't be that bad!

R300/400/500 SV have all been sold as factory models......there was even one R500 Evolution SV!

rubystone

11,254 posts

260 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
darth_pies said:
there was even one R500 Evolution SV!
Two, if you count Fatcat's (non-factory though)

subirg

724 posts

277 months

Thursday 17th July 2008
quotequote all
Fat Arnie said:
Dino, I've driven both - same spec in terms of engine, gearbox, wheels/tyres etc etc. Whats more I drove two cars of each type, back to back 5 mins apart.

The SV is dynamically no match.
I agree. I have driven both and I find the narrow body car more responsive. To me, the SV felt a touch vague in comparison. Ofcourse - we are talking very small differences here. Both types are excellent in their own rights and at the end of the day it all comes down to personal taste - there is no wrong answer!

Fat Arnie

1,655 posts

264 months

Friday 18th July 2008
quotequote all
The SV is much heavier and feels more like a Sierra than a Seven.

RMac

347 posts

222 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2008
quotequote all
Crikey - I'm in agreement with Arnie!

I don't like fatcats either - they are not quite sierra like but ultimately I think they lack a little bit of finesse that the narrow one has.

re' the original post. I have just sold an r300 spec superlight for peanuts, it's not a good time to sell as everyone seems to have a tight hold on their cash at the minute but everything sells at a price! If your r300 was £17k for example, I am sure you would have a small queue for it.

Apart from pistonheads & blatchat, I can't really think of anywhere to sell a caterham.

will_

6,027 posts

204 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2008
quotequote all
Simon, your pics are still terrible - get the car out somewhere nice, in some sunshine, and get some decent pics!

Fat Arnie

1,655 posts

264 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2008
quotequote all
Make your own video to sell your car. Soon gets all over the web like a rash.

Here's my effort, but what I really need is some decent track coverage, whihc is hard to get. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V70i2KJOtZ0

rubystone

11,254 posts

260 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
RMac said:
re' the original post. I have just sold an r300 spec superlight for peanuts
There's the rub - modified cars just don't fetch the money. But as Rich says, price your car at a tad under £17k and you should have some success in selling it....

will_

6,027 posts

204 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
rubystone said:
RMac said:
re' the original post. I have just sold an r300 spec superlight for peanuts
There's the rub - modified cars just don't fetch the money. But as Rich says, price your car at a tad under £17k and you should have some success in selling it....
Looks like it's sold....!

dino ferrana

791 posts

253 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Sorry I think this all just "I don't like it because it is different". Arnie, you said you drove them back to back and didn't like it, well fair enough that is an opinion. But you seem stuck with the notion it is much heavier? 25kg is heavier, especially in the contect of a Caterham's overall weight, but much is definitely stretching it.

As will all Caterhams a lot will depend on how the car is set up, even two that appear to be set up the same can have big difference due to the tolerances of a hand made chassis.

P.Nott

227 posts

190 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
If I remember correctly that vid of Arnies was made on the same day he struggled to keep up with an SV fitted with a 1600 k series! I've seen the rearward vid taken from that very car.

Fat Arnie

1,655 posts

264 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
P.Nott you are totally incorrect, I do not think you were there, and therefore do not comment on matters you know nothing about. We were in fact filming the front of my car. This would not have been very easy if I had overtaken him.

Fat Arnie

1,655 posts

264 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
dino ferrana said:
Sorry I think this all just "I don't like it because it is different". Arnie, you said you drove them back to back and didn't like it, well fair enough that is an opinion. But you seem stuck with the notion it is much heavier? 25kg is heavier, especially in the contect of a Caterham's overall weight, but much is definitely stretching it.

As will all Caterhams a lot will depend on how the car is set up, even two that appear to be set up the same can have big difference due to the tolerances of a hand made chassis.
Dino, they were both Caterham's own CMC cars. I would imagine they spent ages trying to get them as similar as possible.

P.Nott

227 posts

190 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
So thats why you were driving like your pants were on fire while the driver of the SV was managing to keep it all under control was it?wobble It all looked very lairy from where i saw it but i suppose that was all for dramatic effect.

And what makes you think i wasnt there?whistle

Fat Arnie

1,655 posts

264 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Note to self: Add P. Nott to tt list.

P.Nott

227 posts

190 months

Thursday 24th July 2008
quotequote all
I'm surprised you have any room left on the list.byebye

James.S

585 posts

213 months

Thursday 24th July 2008
quotequote all
Don't think much of this is helping him to sell his car, which, incidentally looks very nice. My 2p is that I have have driven several std chassis and an SV fairly hard on the track and didn't really notice a great deal of difference, not that couldn't be ironed out in the setup anyway.

I think the refrence to a sierra is a bit OTT, but I have never driven SV on a road so maybe its something to do with that.

As regard selling......tough market to be selling most things at the moment I am afraid, you seem to be doing as much as possible.

Best of luck.....

PS, video of the car at Croix.......get a proper steering wheel, will help you considerably.


Mr POD

5,153 posts

193 months

Thursday 24th July 2008
quotequote all
Price and WHERE advertised are key.

Who do you think your market is ? Be careful advertising on one make website's - People already have a car, that's why they are there.

What about magazines like evo, or erm practical classics ?