RE: Caterham 7 Roadsport

RE: Caterham 7 Roadsport

Monday 12th March 2007

Caterham 7 Roadsport

Can the new Ford-engined Seven still cut it, or will you pine for the K-Series? James Mills reports.


Caterham 7 Roadsport
Caterham 7 Roadsport

It’s doubtful that Colin Chapman could have envisaged such a prolonged shelf life for the Lotus Seven, his greatest gift to petrolheads.

But here we are, shortly to celebrate 50 years of the car which refreshes drivers’ parts other cars can’t reach. And just like Chapman’s first Lotus Seven to fire to life, the latest Jubilee spin-off from Caterham’s Dartford factory features Ford power beneath its flyweight, louvred aluminium bonnet.

none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none

New engine

It goes without saying that this is a big deal. As the bread and butter offering of the family, the Ford Sigma engine is trading places with that venerable stalwart of the Seven’s history, the Rover K-Series.

No need to spell out why that is. But why Ford’s 1.6-litre Sigma to take its place? Because it’s light, modern, has the delivery characteristics to suit the Seven and is clean – crucial if Caterham is to meet current EU4 emissions regulations – and comes with the R&D muscle of Ford, which will develop the powerplant further to satisfy 2009’s EU5 legislation.

In an age of nanny-state legislation governing the public’s consumption of cars, without Ford’s assistance Caterham’s future would be none too bright. And the world without Caterham would be very dull indeed.

The 1,595cc unit is an all-alloy lump with a cross flow, 16-valve cylinder head and twin overhead camshafts. With a higher compression ratio than the K-Series, and Caterham’s own tweaks – modified inlet cam timing, Caterham throttle body, engine management system and exhaust - your right foot is treated to 125bhp at 6,100rpm and 120lb-ft at 5,350rpm.

That may not sound a great deal but as any seasoned Seven driver will delight in explaining that, in a car weighing 550Kg (in Roadsport 125 trim), it equates to 227bhp per tonne and 0-60mph in just 5.9 seconds.

Move up the scale to the Roadsport 150 and there’s 150bhp at 6,900rpm but a slightly disappointing 120lb-ft at 5,600rpm. which means 270bhp per tonne and 5.0 seconds to 60mph. Do the right thing and tick the Superlight box on the order form and with 300bhp per tonne you’re talking 0-60mph in 4.7 seconds.

Torque about change

Torque is claimed to be the biggest single improvement over the K-Series, and it has to be said the 1.6-litre engine is flexible, pulling cleanly from 1,000rpm in fifth, but is equally happy hunting out the red line.

And when you do get it wound up there’s all the noise, performance and excitement you could reasonably expect from the baby of the range. At times I can’t help feeling it doesn’t have the crisp sweet-revving character of the ‘K’, but nonetheless it’s a great starting point for any Caterham virgin. Especially if all the customer cars can boast a gearshift as light and smooth as our test car’s five-speeder.

Shoe-horning the Sigma engine into the Seven’s chassis was no simple matter, however. It didn’t fit. At the same time as the engine programme, the new management wanted to further refine and improve the chassis’ spaceframe design, which resulted in an end to the firm’s relationship with Arch motors – whose enginers bronze welded each chassis by hand – and an increased commitment with Caged (now Steel Fabrications Ltd) which designed and constructed all the Seven’s roll bars and race cages.

The company talks proudly of CAD modelling, FEA finite element analysis, computer controlled tube and sheet laser cutters and robotic welding cells. So the rise of the machines even touches Caterham. Whatever next -- snow in the Sahara? The question is, what does it have to show for it on the road?

On the road

I have to say, the spaceframe chassis feels a lot stiffer than the couple of Sevens I’ve run in the past. Caterham claims an increase of 12 per cent, but the impression on your backside and fingertips is far greater. The trademark flexing and creaking of the chassis is less noticeable. Which is good news, as the suspension geometry can work as it was intended to, keeping the wheels in contact with terra firma.

Driving any Caterham is usually a life-affirming experience. And I’m glad to say that’s still very much the case in the new baby of the range. There may not be a glut of power, but if you haven’t driven one in a while there’s still a whole new world of sensory stimulation that comes as a sharp wake-up call.

The test car’s Avon ZV3 tyres wouldn’t be my first choice, but there’s a lot of fun to be had trying to maintain momentum once up to speed. The DeDion chassis’ natural balance is nicely neutral. Push beyond that into understeer and you can play around with the throttle, coaxing it into gentle lift-off oversteer and then a whiff of power oversteer if you gas it again in tighter second and third gear bends. And the beauty is, with the touchy-feely tactile feedback – through the ever-wondrous steering and seat of the pants - you trust it intimately.

Criticisms? The brakes showed an unnerving willingness to lock up at the front on our car in the wet, but that’s easily fine tuned to taste. And the four-point harness really should be five, as it slips up your torso no matter how tightly you fasten the lap strap.

Meanwhile, the hood remains as quaint as ever. (Don’t slow down and you won’t get wet.)

Driveability

It goes without saying that you shouldn’t approach the Roadsport 125 expecting 100mph-plus thrills, or the ability to hold court at track days.  And it also goes without saying that not everyone craves the full-blown, mind-numbing performance of top-end versions.

As a starting point, then, the Roadsport 125 does all you can realistically ask of it. The Sigma’s day to day drivability is excellent, top-end performance is stirring enough and the Seven’s chassis is better than ever. And as a pointer of what to expect, it should have Caterham fans excited about the Seven’s future. Roll on the R300...

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

L100NYY

Original Poster:

35,208 posts

243 months

Monday 12th March 2007
quotequote all
It would be interesting to have a go in one of these Sigma's, 12 per cent stiffer sounds tres interesting and of course the increase in torque in something this light must be pretty noticeable.

I am oh so glad that Caterham are still going strong and are continuing to tweak the narrow bodied cars as to me they are proper 7's and one day I will be back in one (hopefully the Academy one day).

Good work guys thumbup

ps love the colour scheme too.

mafioso

2,349 posts

214 months

Monday 12th March 2007
quotequote all
Hmmmmmm looks very nice! I am surprised, though, that they haven't gone with the new dash from the CSR, or something similar!? Still nice though!

L100NYY

Original Poster:

35,208 posts

243 months

Monday 12th March 2007
quotequote all
mafioso said:
Hmmmmmm looks very nice! I am surprised, though, that they haven't gone with the new dash from the CSR, or something similar!? Still nice though!


I prefer the old dash personally.

lord summerisle

8,138 posts

225 months

Monday 12th March 2007
quotequote all
L100NYY said:
mafioso said:
Hmmmmmm looks very nice! I am surprised, though, that they haven't gone with the new dash from the CSR, or something similar!? Still nice though!


I prefer the old dash personally.


same here.

ssoanes

7 posts

205 months

Monday 12th March 2007
quotequote all
Ditto, keep the old dash. But for me it would be the Duratec anyone got 31K spare?

I do think the Ford is a positive move forward, I've had a K and it was fun, but the engine is now long in the tooth. It would be good to try the new Sigma

getoffmyland

9 posts

210 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
Nice article. Likewise with the old dash…

It's great to see the company still going strong, I was sceptical at first about another Ford engine after all these years, but I might be won over. I love my racing K and it’s served me well, but the choice for a cottage manufacturer must be slim and this looks like a healthy choice based on reviews. The only downside I would imagine for existing owners would be some fairly hefty work to upgrade current engines with a sigma if it ever went pop/fancy a change. It will also be interesting to see how this affects the race series, does anyone know how easy to tune these engines are? I’m sure it’s a cheaper affair than a K…

zippy500

1,883 posts

269 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
Im 99.9% sure I saw this car on sunday travelling towards Cirencester on the A419 on Sunday afternoon.

Was on my way to view a HPC.

rubystone

11,254 posts

259 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
zippy500 said:
Im 99.9% sure I saw this car on sunday travelling towards Cirencester on the A419 on Sunday afternoon.

Was on my way to view a HPC.


I hope it was a genuine HPC....there are a few out there that are not what they seem - don't forget to check the chassis number stamped on the pedalbox suround too - you may have to unscrew the cover though....Tango 7 has a genuine one for sale - Newcastle Under Lyme area

dino ferrana

791 posts

252 months

Tuesday 13th March 2007
quotequote all
getoffmyland, there are still a lot of K's around for replacements, it is just that Caterham couldn't base their future production on them. If you think about the number of cars using the K, there will be parts and whole engines kicking around for a good few years yet.

Must have a go in a Sigma, it seems to have been well received. Apparently the engine is slightly lighter than a K?

steveww

15 posts

227 months

Wednesday 14th March 2007
quotequote all
125bhp @ 6100 rpm that it what I get out of the standard Lotus/Ford twinc in my old Elan and that is only 8 valves, carbs and dizzy. Surely engine design must have moved on more by now? Sure the old twinc would not pass any modern EU emissions standards and has been known to throw the odd flame or two out the back. Still I expected more power than that from a modern 1.6

Shaun_E

747 posts

260 months

Wednesday 14th March 2007
quotequote all
Don't think you'd get 150,000 miles out of the twink without a rebuild though and it certainly wouldn't pass any emissions standards. This is the base engine in the range after all and early 7s had far fewer horses. There is a 150bhp Sigma engined car as well.

Yellow Perilous

3 posts

214 months

Thursday 15th March 2007
quotequote all
I have been running the Sigma engine in my Shawspeed for the last two years. The engine straight out of a tin top installed in my car with OMEX, decent exhaust and rolling roaded made 125bhp. The addition of Shawspeeds cams took it up to 176bhp and it's about to hopefully go close to 200bhp with the addition of Jenveys. It's a brilliant engine, torquey, revey and very light, exactly what you want for a '7' style car. It's the engine to replace the 'Pinto'. Shawspeed have built a 220bhp version.

tommobot

648 posts

207 months

Sunday 18th March 2007
quotequote all
I'm pretty sure its the same engine that is found in the 1.6 Focus, and the Fiesta Zetec S. Its probably about 6 years old. I remember in my old Fiesta it was a great little engine to be fair. It seemed to have a suprisng amount of 'go' in the lower revs which was very pleasing

notthehamster

134 posts

210 months

Tuesday 20th March 2007
quotequote all
The article seems to imply that Caterham are breaking with tradition by dropping the K in favour of Ford. The 1700 I built in 1990 (G480 XRX) was a lovely car. Plenty of torque, lots of flame, very revable, and nice rorty Webers. Long live Ford engined Caterhams! RIP K.

ewenm

28,506 posts

245 months

Tuesday 20th March 2007
quotequote all
tommobot said:
I'm pretty sure its the same engine that is found in the 1.6 Focus, and the Fiesta Zetec S. Its probably about 6 years old. I remember in my old Fiesta it was a great little engine to be fair. It seemed to have a suprisng amount of 'go' in the lower revs which was very pleasing

I thought the Sigma and Zetec engines were different...?

dino ferrana

791 posts

252 months

Tuesday 20th March 2007
quotequote all
They are but this is where Ford's ridiculous naming policy is confusing. I think most engines in the line up have been known by most of the names they use. Versions of the Zetec have been badged Duratec, despite being nothing to do with the all ally Duratec HE.

Ford further confused everyone by making Zetec a trim level as well!

notthehamster

134 posts

210 months

Tuesday 20th March 2007
quotequote all
They even managed to turn a manufacturing business into a trim level - Ghia.

cyberface

12,214 posts

257 months

Tuesday 20th March 2007
quotequote all
The Sigma IIRC was the engine in the Puma. Yamaha designed it. I had a Racing Puma, this had 156 bhp from the 1.7 litre variant, not a lot more to be had without big mods.

But with balanced bottom end and lots of revs, I'd reckon you'd get a reliable 200 OK out of it - certainly the Pumas racing in the Super 1600 (or whatever it was called) rally championship had 200+ bhp.

bigbcraig

38 posts

207 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2007
quotequote all
I think a new engine is a gereat step forward, and stifer/better chassis and suspension is always welcome, but i'm not sure this is the best engine. New technology and better emissions are always good, but I would've hoped for something more atheletic.

Still dreamingof the RST-V8, i guess

bazzio

35 posts

200 months

Wednesday 26th September 2007
quotequote all
steveww said:
125bhp @ 6100 rpm that it what I get out of the standard Lotus/Ford twinc in my old Elan and that is only 8 valves, carbs and dizzy. Surely engine design must have moved on more by now? Sure the old twinc would not pass any modern EU emissions standards and has been known to throw the odd flame or two out the back. Still I expected more power than that from a modern 1.6
i agree with you mate, i had a 1995 honda civic vti 1.6 that had 160bhp!! thats 12 years ago!!
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED