Typhon power?

Author
Discussion

ccharlie6

Original Poster:

773 posts

240 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
was there any announcement at the motorshow about the power levels of the Typhon because this was one of the things i was looking forward to.

NCE 61

2,386 posts

281 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
580bhp, and 450lb torque it'll be untouchable by anything less than an F1, was told 530bhp/tonne, and looks like 300lbs of torque is aviable from 3000 rpm onwards.

Was mentioned in this thread

www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=101555&f=5&h=0&p=9

BCA

8,622 posts

257 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
The "untouchable by anything less than an F1" was my own personal opinion, not a statement made officially. Alos, as I have said before, thats all down to whether it gets the traction...

The power figures are from the press pack info/little dyno graph/BS himself.

fish

3,976 posts

282 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
Without restricters in I think you'll find it's nearer to 680bhp.....

PinkPanther

1,010 posts

264 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
fish said:
Without restricters in I think you'll find it's nearer to 680bhp.....


Seconded... told from an official source that the engine had been put on a dyno and was developing 680bhp. Nice!

Supersonic

1,163 posts

262 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
Holy , I take it we won't see that kind of power in the road cars though?

>> Edited by Supersonic on Wednesday 26th May 18:03

BCA

8,622 posts

257 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
580 is the official word for road cars... havent got a clue what you are talking about restrictor wise??

bad boy

821 posts

264 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
680 bhp!!!!!!

ccharlie6

Original Poster:

773 posts

240 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
yes what do you mean by restrictors? is that put in by TVR themselves to detune the engine? as i am only familiar with restrictors in sportscar racing

mrs fish

30,018 posts

258 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
They have apparently been playing around with restricting it because 680bhp is too much for a road car, so they have to restrict it somehow.

luca brazzi

3,975 posts

265 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
mrs fish said:
apparently because 680bhp is too much for a road car, so they have to restrict it somehow.
If I bought one, I'd like it unrestricted please....surely its my decision. Just being ultra greedy I suppose.

TimW

3,848 posts

247 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
luca brazzi said:


If I bought one, I'd like it unrestricted please....surely its my decision.



Are you sure

DoctorD

1,542 posts

256 months

Thursday 27th May 2004
quotequote all
BCA said:
580 is the official word for road cars... havent got a clue what you are talking about restrictor wise??



There is no official word yet! There's only one car made (i.e. ours, or prime-als I should say) and its producing 'well over' 600bhp and more than 500lbft on the dyno so let's just say your figures are a little 'conservative'..

Around about 530bhp/tonne is close enough to the truth though.

>> Edited by DoctorD on Thursday 27th May 18:03

BCA

8,622 posts

257 months

Friday 28th May 2004
quotequote all
Im just quoting from the TVR press pack and from what Ben Samuelson said to me, does it get much more official than that??

Will be good if it does have much more power, part of me wants TVR to leave the official figures lower than the real though...

woody

2,187 posts

284 months

Friday 28th May 2004
quotequote all
BCA said:

'part of me wants TVR to leave the official figures lower than the real though... '


For once

DoctorD

1,542 posts

256 months

Friday 28th May 2004
quotequote all
One of the nice things about the Typhon is that it's not an off-the-peg kind of car. Each step of the build process has been a custom decision from the type of seats, choice of gear selector, gear ratios, differential, tyre choice, brake sizes and even down to what name will be displayed on it (i.e. Typhon, Tuscan R, etc..), likewise the amount of power and torque that will be produced.

Prime_al has had some very specific requirements that have been achieved with his car that perhaps TVR will not replicate on other cars (unless asked to do so). For that reason it may not be possible to perform a definitive test on a Typhon because I suspect each car will vary somewhat. For example the final drive on Prime_Als car has been changed to provide longer gearing, otherwise it would not have been physically possible for the Typhon to crack the 200mph barrier. Whether this kind of change will be applied to other Typhons I'm not so sure. Also determining the final engine performance has been very much an interactive process between TVR and the customer so for that reason I don't quite see how a generic set of figures can have much meaning in the real world.

That's one of the benefits of buying a Typhon compared to a Ferrari or Porsche, TVR are providing a more tailored product.

Marki

15,763 posts

270 months

Friday 28th May 2004
quotequote all
Trouble with this is its still a speed 6 or am i wrong ?

DoctorD

1,542 posts

256 months

Friday 28th May 2004
quotequote all
Yes it uses the Speed 6 engine at it's core, but with much strengthening and modification..

Marki

15,763 posts

270 months

Saturday 29th May 2004
quotequote all
DoctorD said:
Yes it uses the Speed 6 engine at it's core, but with much strengthening and modification..


Lets hope so

whitey

2,508 posts

284 months

Saturday 29th May 2004
quotequote all
Marki said:
Trouble with this is its still a speed 6 or am i wrong ?


yes, shame it's not a V8 but...the Speed 6 is one fantastic engine....every time I get thoughts of going back to a V8 TVR, I take my Tuscan for a drive and the noise and performance quickly puts those thoughts to bed....