Best 5 games of the last 6/8 months....

Best 5 games of the last 6/8 months....

Author
Discussion

Furyous

Original Poster:

23,731 posts

223 months

Sunday 1st October 2006
quotequote all
Can you come up with the definitive top 5 games from the last 6/8 months or so, and also, what you would say the ABSOLUTE minimum pc spec to play them well would be......

Looking to take the plunge inot pc gaming and want to get a feel for whats hot and whats not.

TIA

F

D_Mike

5,301 posts

242 months

Sunday 1st October 2006
quotequote all
rFactor!

Halflife 2

Company of Heroes

Civilisation 4

solitaire

not sure about spec, sorry.

Digby

8,252 posts

248 months

Sunday 1st October 2006
quotequote all
It will totaly depend on the type of game you prefer really.
One mans meat and all that..
You can get all sorts of experiences from the same genre.
Some driving games are simulators, others involve weapons, jumps and boosts.
Some FPS (first person shooter) games involve full on, fairly authentic WW2 gunfire, others involve guns that shoot slime and stuff at aliens or monsters.

You could simply google for the best selling games or most popular probably, but that may not make them the best in many peoples eyes.Plus often the online ability of many can make of break them for many people.
Battle field 2 would be a good example.Pretty poor as a single player event, superb online!.
I could for example suggest how utterly boring Doom 3 was to me, then a million people will tell you i am mad.
I could say how much i love GT Legends (GTL), Rfactor and GTR, but you may prefer a fast and furious slant so Need For Speed Underground 2 would be better.
Some people lose months of their lives to online universes in games such as World Of Warcraft and Eve, others prefer a single player experience and lose just as much time with things like Elder Scrolls Oblivion.

Very hard to suggest a top 5 for me, i could only tell you what i dedicated the most time too if that would help?.

As for PC specs, it's much the same story.How fussy are you?.Do you want maximum eye candy in games and large resolutions, or are you happy to play on lower details and lower FPS (frames per second)?.
On that front, PC wise it is always best to get the maximum you can afford.PC technology gets old FAST so you don't have to spend a fortune to get a decent gaming rig that will run most things well and look pretty.
However, if you don't go cutting edge, you can forget maximum details, a 1600x1200 + resolution and high FPS in more modern games.
That is especially evident in car racing games for example.You can spend an age getting something running well and looking nice only to find that when you slap 35 A.I cars into your race, you find out your graphics card runs like an asthmatic ant with heavy shopping (thanks Black Adder).

That wasn't a great deal of help really was it?

Maybe tell us what you like or what you prefer and the suggestions will come thick and fast.









Edited by Digby on Sunday 1st October 18:20

Furyous

Original Poster:

23,731 posts

223 months

Sunday 1st October 2006
quotequote all
Porbably the same as most on here, true life drivers and fps.

Trouble is, here and elsewhere, everyones is talking in groups of capital letters, RTL, ETC ETC, its not as easy to work out what they're talking about.

Im coming from a ps2 thats about on its last legs, but games I played and enjoyed on that would be Grand Tourismo and any of the Splinter Cell or earlier Doom style stuff.

Nothing original, but my pc is spec isnt huge.... xp2,p4 3.00 gb,512 ram, radeon x300 graphics.

I dont want to buy a game if its not going to run.Ram is cheap, so not worried, more concerned about the graphics capabilities.

Cheers

F

xiphias

5,888 posts

229 months

Sunday 1st October 2006
quotequote all
My parents have near enough the same spec as you, and if you turn down the graphics a bit, most stuff will run.

D_Mike

5,301 posts

242 months

Sunday 1st October 2006
quotequote all
yep, my parents have that too, except with a gig of RAM. I have the same spec but with a spanglier graphics card and only 512mb of RAM... stuff runs more slowly on my PC than on theirs. They can run HL2, call of duty 2, civ 4, GTL etc. all as well as my PC can. I need to buy some RAM I think.

FourWheelDrift

88,711 posts

286 months

Sunday 1st October 2006
quotequote all
Other than rFactor I haven't really bought a game over the last 6-8 months. If you're not buying the best PC available to run the very latest games on at the highest level graphics levels look at older games (12-18months old) which you can do. You'll have much more fun that way maxxing them out than running something newer at low or meduim settings.

Older games that I pretty much max out on my machine. (2Ghz AMD, 1GB RAM, 7800GS 256mb AGP nVidia card)

Rome : TotalWar
GTR & GTL
Theif : Deadly Shadows
Battlefield 2 (except some very big city maps)
Doom 3

Furyous

Original Poster:

23,731 posts

223 months

Sunday 1st October 2006
quotequote all
Sounds like more ram, maybe another 512 ?

If I was going to go for another card, without spending a fortune, any recommendations?

Cheers fellas, looks like pc gaming is the way forward.

F

__LEE__

7,520 posts

245 months

Sunday 1st October 2006
quotequote all
Furyous said:
Sounds like more ram, maybe another 512 ?

If I was going to go for another card, without spending a fortune, any recommendations?

Cheers fellas, looks like pc gaming is the way forward.

F


I play the odd game with my XP 2.5ghz, 1gb, Geforce GT6600 and found that when I increased ram from 512 to 1gb there was a huge jump in my machines performance.

I actually bought the ram because I use the machine for work and need more ram for VMware stuff.

Dakkon

7,826 posts

255 months

Monday 2nd October 2006
quotequote all
Well Oblivion has to be one of the top 5 made PC gamers No.1 game this year.

-DeaDLocK-

3,367 posts

253 months

Monday 2nd October 2006
quotequote all
D_Mike said:
yep, my parents have that too, except with a gig of RAM. I have the same spec but with a spanglier graphics card and only 512mb of RAM... stuff runs more slowly on my PC than on theirs. They can run HL2, call of duty 2, civ 4, GTL etc. all as well as my PC can. I need to buy some RAM I think.

I've got twin 7800GTXs mated to an Athlon X2 and 2GB of RAM, and I'm really annoyed at how slow some games seem to run at the settings I want them to.

I think I have to reassess my priorities. But I feel cheated out of my money for the game if I'm not getting the ultra quality textures with 8x AA at 1280x1024.

dick dastardly

8,315 posts

265 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2006
quotequote all
Is 'Hitman: Blood Money' out on the PC? If so then get it. I had the PS2 game and it's brilliant.

Zod

35,295 posts

260 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2006
quotequote all
-DeaDLocK- said:
D_Mike said:
yep, my parents have that too, except with a gig of RAM. I have the same spec but with a spanglier graphics card and only 512mb of RAM... stuff runs more slowly on my PC than on theirs. They can run HL2, call of duty 2, civ 4, GTL etc. all as well as my PC can. I need to buy some RAM I think.

I've got twin 7800GTXs mated to an Athlon X2 and 2GB of RAM, and I'm really annoyed at how slow some games seem to run at the settings I want them to.

I think I have to reassess my priorities. But I feel cheated out of my money for the game if I'm not getting the ultra quality textures with 8x AA at 1280x1024.
Me too and I need to run my games at 1900x1200 on my 24" monitor. You never get to that stage where you are ahead of game requirements.

DucatiGary

7,765 posts

227 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2006
quotequote all
-DeaDLocK- said:

I've got twin 7800GTXs mated to an Athlon X2 and 2GB of RAM, and I'm really annoyed at how slow some games seem to run at the settings I want them to.

I think I have to reassess my priorities. But I feel cheated out of my money for the game if I'm not getting the ultra quality textures with 8x AA at 1280x1024.


I think you have a problem somwhere if your stuttering at 1280x max everything, when using 7800GTX in SLi, have you tried using everest ?

normally tells you where the bottle necks are.