Random portraits thread
Discussion
Kind of - it looks a bit off compared to the stuff you did with Jenn, which from you is a bit surprising. I thought you'd have more subject/fill lighting in the shadow than foreground if you know what I mean
Edit - pull mine apart if you want, I still cant shift the hue probs
Edit - pull mine apart if you want, I still cant shift the hue probs
Edited by andy-xr on Sunday 24th May 18:04
A portrait shot I took back in 1987 of a school friend.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonrb/3589510682/
Taken with an Olympus OM-2n using Ilford HP5 film and self-developed. Scanned from the negative a few days ago.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonrb/3589510682/
Taken with an Olympus OM-2n using Ilford HP5 film and self-developed. Scanned from the negative a few days ago.
bit of an impromptu shoot yesterday. Vicki normally does very edgy alternate stuff, attracts weirdo's she says so wanted some nicer stuff for her portfolio
and for Andy here is what was used sparingly, the light was just fantastic without it
full contact sheet => http://www.flickr.com/photos/swindon/sets/72157619...
and for Andy here is what was used sparingly, the light was just fantastic without it
full contact sheet => http://www.flickr.com/photos/swindon/sets/72157619...
stigmundfreud said:
bit of an impromptu shoot yesterday. Vicki normally does very edgy alternate stuff, attracts weirdo's she says so wanted some nicer stuff for her portfolio
I simply love the narrowness of the depth of field of this pic - how the background and the very foreground are out of focus, but the subject (dribbles) is crisply in focus. Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff