SD Cards
Author
Discussion

Racefan_uk

Original Poster:

2,935 posts

285 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
I've got a camera that records to SD card, I'm looking for a bigger size card from the 2GB one I have now, possibly 4 or 8GB, but just wondering one small thing...

Will a Sandisk card work just as well as a Panasonic 'brand' one will?

I'm 99% sure it will, as long as it's from a reliable source and not some ebay retard selling didgy goods, but just wondered if any of the PH collective would have a better insight?

andy-xr

13,204 posts

233 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
Bigger ones are usually SDHC, so you need to make sure your camera is OK with it

If it is, check out the 16GB ones at Play.com - I've got a couple for my camera

h0b0

9,070 posts

225 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
i would have more fiath in the the Scan Disk (SD) card than the Pan one as the pan will be just re-branded. I have 2 16GB class 6 cards that i bought for $30 each a month ago and work fine in my HD camera. Although now I think that is probably expensive. Check that the PC, card reader and camera can read anything of decent size because the older stuff cant.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
Manufacturers sometimes list the cameras that have been tested ok with their cards.

Get one from Play.com...really daft prices.

These are fast...


Racefan_uk

Original Poster:

2,935 posts

285 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
I think 8GB is my limit and my instructions say SDHC is the only option at that size anyway. Seeing as how the Panny one is 30 quid and the SanDisk one is a tenner on amazon, I know where I'm looking at first!

Legmaster

1,274 posts

236 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
www.7dayshop.com

Accept no substitute.

Hunky Dory

1,094 posts

234 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
Nothing wrong with SanDisk cards. thumbup
Almost certainly they will be "better" than the branded Panasonic ones, particularly if you can stretch to Extreme 2 or 3's.


FlossyThePig

4,143 posts

272 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
Using the CHDK hack on my Canon found virtually no difference in the speed of Sandisk Extreme III compared to Ultra II, but that's on my camera.

Established 1984

1,237 posts

214 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
h0b0 said:
i would have more fiath in the the Scan Disk (SD) card than the Pan one as the pan will be just re-branded. I have 2 16GB class 6 cards that i bought for $30 each a month ago and work fine in my HD camera. Although now I think that is probably expensive. Check that the PC, card reader and camera can read anything of decent size because the older stuff cant.
teacher SD stands for Secure Digital not SanDisk. smile

I use SanDisk Ultra II in my dslr (4 & 8gb) and are more than happy with them. I won't pay signifcantly more for panasonic ones.


ETA: I just read that the SD format was developed by Panasonic, Sandisk and Toshiba. So I don't think we can dismiss the Panasonic ones as 'just re-branded'.

Edited by Established 1984 on Wednesday 3rd December 19:44

GingerWizard

4,721 posts

227 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
I've got a micro SD sandisk, 8GB in my phone, its fine. bullet proof actually, uploads fast, if anything its my phone software that is slow. Cost me about 20 notes on ebay. For the money they are..........., win win me'thinks!

GingerWizard

Dogwatch

6,381 posts

251 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
www.mymemory.co.uk are worth a look. They have a 'what's suitable for my camera?' function too.