Seatbelt mod part all made and fitted

Seatbelt mod part all made and fitted

Author
Discussion

B16JUS

Original Poster:

2,385 posts

238 months

Saturday 28th January 2012
quotequote all
after many a drive untwisting the seatbelt it was time to do this mod

made by a local company and powdercoated took 5 min to fit and my god makes putting on and off so much easyer

next on the list is all new gauges from stack




GreenV8S

30,214 posts

285 months

Sunday 29th January 2012
quotequote all
B16JUS said:
next on the list is all new gauges from stack
Hang on to the originals, a working set of TVR gauges is worth money.

B16JUS

Original Poster:

2,385 posts

238 months

Sunday 29th January 2012
quotequote all
GreenV8S said:
B16JUS said:
next on the list is all new gauges from stack
Hang on to the originals, a working set of TVR gauges is worth money.
Yes was going to sell them all on apart from the speedo to prove millage before new speedo fitted

These are the new dials that are going in, all made by Stack with black face and led backlight








moffspeed

2,706 posts

208 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
ah the old seat belt mounting chestnut...

I'm so keen to do something similar as one of the few negative experiences of "S" ownership is disentangling the 'belt and persuading the inertia reel to take up the slack. Someone has previously suggested a similar mod. but the concern was expressed that, in the event of an accident, the load would be in the long axis of the mounting bolt and encourage failure as opposed to the original design whereby the load would be at right-angles to the mounting bolt.

Anyone with an engineering background care to comment ?

B16JUS

Original Poster:

2,385 posts

238 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
moffspeed said:
ah the old seat belt mounting chestnut...

I'm so keen to do something similar as one of the few negative experiences of "S" ownership is disentangling the 'belt and persuading the inertia reel to take up the slack. Someone has previously suggested a similar mod. but the concern was expressed that, in the event of an accident, the load would be in the long axis of the mounting bolt and encourage failure as opposed to the original design whereby the load would be at right-angles to the mounting bolt.

Anyone with an engineering background care to comment ?
I would say if you spank a S that hard that the direction of the bolt of the seatbelt is a issue, you would be injured badly anyway

SteveOS3

494 posts

192 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
I sent my insurers the spec's of the mod', some photos' and a link to the tvrsseries.com webpage and they were happy to approve the mod; it is worth checking with your insurers that they are ok with the mod too.


SteveO

Ragtop

592 posts

202 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
moffspeed said:
Anyone with an engineering background care to comment ?
Firstly, the tension in the part of the belt that passes over your shoulder (approximately in the horizontal direction) is reacted by the same tension in the part of the belt that goes into the reel (approximately in the vertical direction), hence the reaction at the buckle is ~45degrees to the bolt axis regardless of whether it's horizontal or vertical.

Secondly, broadly speaking, bolts are stronger in tension than lateral shear.

Thirdly, provided the threads are in good nick, the force in the belt required to load the bolt(s) to ductile failure would cut you in half if the belt didn't snap first.

I've done this mod, and it works extremely well.


Regards,
Graham

phillpot

17,121 posts

184 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
Ragtop said:
lots of sensible stuff....
I'd have thought the "weakest link" and therefore first thing to give, by a long way, would be the bonding of the mounting post into the body tub?

Even back in the 80's that must have passed some sort of crash testing?

B16JUS

Original Poster:

2,385 posts

238 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
Ragtop said:
moffspeed said:
Anyone with an engineering background care to comment ?
Firstly, the tension in the part of the belt that passes over your shoulder (approximately in the horizontal direction) is reacted by the same tension in the part of the belt that goes into the reel (approximately in the vertical direction), hence the reaction at the buckle is ~45degrees to the bolt axis regardless of whether it's horizontal or vertical.

Secondly, broadly speaking, bolts are stronger in tension than lateral shear.

Thirdly, provided the threads are in good nick, the force in the belt required to load the bolt(s) to ductile failure would cut you in half if the belt didn't snap first.

I've done this mod, and it works extremely well.


Regards,
Graham
So was i right in saying for this to be a issue you would already be dead / inhalf or very injured already lol

moffspeed

2,706 posts

208 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
maybe I should buy a Volvo 240...

But seriously is this seat belt mod available anywhere ??

Andy Lynch

445 posts

163 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
moffspeed

I am looking to get a pair made, if you want a pair, PM me and I will get 2 pairs made, for cost price.

Andy

TurboTony

908 posts

172 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
Any reason why the 7/16" rose joint cannot be used? I believe that someone had done this.

B16JUS

Original Poster:

2,385 posts

238 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
moffspeed said:
maybe I should buy a Volvo 240...

But seriously is this seat belt mod available anywhere ??
I used a company in Romford if your local

Gerald-TVR

4,896 posts

198 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
SteveOS3 said:
it is worth ESSENTIAL checking with your insurers that they are ok with the mod too.


SteveO
I think

GreenV8S

30,214 posts

285 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
Gerald-TVR said:
I think
I think too.

From an engineering point of view it looks OK to me, but it's obviously a safety critical modification which means it is a relevant fact and must be disclosed to the insurers.

v8s4me

7,242 posts

220 months

Sunday 5th February 2012
quotequote all
TurboTony said:
Any reason why the 7/16" rose joint cannot be used? I believe that someone had done this.
None at all IMHO - see here

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Am just about to renew my insurance so will update if there are any issues.