Turn your freezer off???
Turn your freezer off???
Author
Discussion

R666 TUS

Original Poster:

1,052 posts

269 months

Saturday 2nd July 2005
quotequote all
Just seen the latest barmy Government idea
on the news to give everyone a card limiting
our energy use in kg's of carbon energy used?
So in order to use the Tiv your fridge/freezer
T.V. etc will have to go so you dont go over
your limit.
Whatever next..... :rolleyes:

Col

randlemarcus

13,646 posts

260 months

Saturday 2nd July 2005
quotequote all
Simple then, turn the TV off, throw away the radio, drop the newspaper subscription, then you dont have to listen to the sh1t piped straight from Downing Street, and can just get on with life.
If only we could turn off the source as easily...

turbobloke

117,155 posts

289 months

Saturday 2nd July 2005
quotequote all
R666 TUS said:
Just seen the latest barmy Government idea on the news to give everyone a card limiting
our energy use in kg's of carbon energy used...
These idiot politico 5hit-4-brains seriously need to fk off and learn some science. Then again, they know the greeny scare stories are b0ll0x already. So they can just fk off

MrV

2,748 posts

257 months

Saturday 2nd July 2005
quotequote all
Was thinking it was just me who had heard this lastest lonney idea ,Im just about reaching the point of no return with this country and the tts that voted this lot in again


How the hell they can make this idea even sound appealing is beyond me

R666 TUS

Original Poster:

1,052 posts

269 months

Saturday 2nd July 2005
quotequote all
If your really good and dont use your car
you can save up enough credits to go on a plane
for your hols.

runt

314 posts

256 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
Prime Minister,our nearest star does go through varying periods of activity..planet Earth is 4500m yrs old..

DJFish

6,017 posts

292 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
Due to the Kyoto agreement, industry has to limit it's CO2 output or pay/trade for it.
It'll come to either us limiting our energy use or paying more for it.
That's the price of change.

turbobloke

117,155 posts

289 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
DJFish said:
Due to the Kyoto agreement, industry has to limit it's CO2 output or pay/trade for it.
It'll come to either us limiting our energy use or paying more for it. That's the price of change.
Hard to disagree with this, BLiar has shown steady commitment to Kyoto and we're signed up. This has implications. Then there's that last line. It's not the price of change, it's the price of science abuse and an electorate dumbed down enough to believe the scaremongering and comply.

DJFish

6,017 posts

292 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
turbobloke said:

it's the price of science abuse and an electorate dumbed down enough to believe the scaremongering and comply.


Hey ho!
Emissions trading makes my job more interesting and I live on a hill so whether it's a real cause of global warming or not, I'm still a winner!

cotty

42,224 posts

313 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
Why not hook all the rowing/cycling machines in the gyms all over the country into the national grid

turbobloke

117,155 posts

289 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
Good idea but they'd have us rowing and cycling into a mask with a funnel on our butts, then tax us on the carbon dioxide and methane we emit.

cotty

42,224 posts

313 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Good idea but they'd have us rowing and cycling into a mask with a funnel on our butts, then tax us on the carbon dioxide and methane we emit.


You forgot about taxing the air we breath, mind you it seem like they do that now

alans

3,770 posts

285 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
China are planning on building 500 new coal fired power stations over the next 10yrs. My car will make an ioata of difference?
Alan

turbobloke

117,155 posts

289 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
alans said:
China are planning on building 500 new coal fired power stations over the next 10yrs. My car will make an ioata of difference? Alan

It's worse: the UK government is directly involved in that project.

WORKSHOP ON CHINA-UK RESEARCH COLLABORATION ON CLEANER COAL TECHNOLOGIES

Report No. COAL R194, DTI/Pub URN 00/967 where on page 7 we have:

In contrast to UK coals, Chinese coals are generally regarded as being low in sulphur. Nevertheless, some 35% of coal reserves in China exceed 1% sulphur and, in 1995, out of a total coal production in China of 1.29bt, >150Mt had sulphur content of 2.0% or over. Much of China’s coal is burnt untreated with only ~30% of the total production washed. With production in China predicted to rise to 1.8bt per annum by 2010, sulphur emissions from coal represent a serious threat to the global environment.

The sulphur dioxide emitted is acknowledged to be a major environmental danger. Even if collaboration cleans up the emissions in terms of sulphur, getting on for 2bt per annum means that any savings in CO2 emissions we make will be wiped out entirely by China, not to mention India...and the rest.

The UN IPCC Kyoto Protocol excludes China and other developing nations and, is nothing to do with the environment through climate change - it's everything to do with redistribution of wealth at individual and international levels.

The DTI know it and the UN know it.

>> Edited by turbobloke on Sunday 3rd July 16:14

GreenV8S

31,017 posts

313 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
There are several big underground coal fires in China, one huge one has been burning for decades and burned a humungous amount of coal, millions of tons iifc. So we'll ramp up the price of fuel, reduce petrol consumpion by a few % by preventing the very poor from travelling, drop energy consumption for the country as a whole by thousandths of a percent and for the world as a whole by naff all. And this will help the environment how, exactly?

On the other hand it will give the government a huge cash income which will grow and grow as the price of fuel goes up, and they can applaud themselves for doig their bit to 'protect' the environment, and they can also achieve their political objective of stopping people from using private transport. I should say 'other' people because of course politicians are far too important to use public transport.

turbobloke

117,155 posts

289 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
One other thing worth mentioning, PHers may have noticed that there is a gradual replacement of traditional traffic lights by new LED varieties, these are cheaper, last longer, have better visibility in glare AND when most of the 'old' style signals have been replaced, the lower power consumption will save the authorities hundreds of thousands of pounds per annum AND reduce CO2 emissions by the equivalent of two power stations per annum. As part of the transport sector, this - together with the motor industry's successful reductions in average CO2 emissions - means we have more than done our bit already.

Offer to plant trees as part of your carbon credits and see what happens...the words of a Kyoto delegate will be echoing across the land

"planting trees won't bring about the societal changes we seek"

Lois

14,706 posts

281 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
I thought we won WW2 so we didn't have to live in a dictatorship

rooster

2,241 posts

266 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
I am seriously thinking of living in France, great appreciation for TVRs, great booze,food,weather, roads and cheap petrol, houses etc!

BliarOut

72,863 posts

268 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
em, I'll just run an extension lead out to the street light.
[/PikeyMode]

If the Yanks don't sign up to Kyoto, the UK preserving energy really is a bit like pissing in the ocean.

DJFish

6,017 posts

292 months

Sunday 3rd July 2005
quotequote all
Yes, but at least we can sit high in our ivory towers saying 'we told you so' while the waves are lapping against the door.