The Rowing Thread!

The Rowing Thread!

Author
Discussion

Sway

26,419 posts

195 months

Sunday 8th April 2012
quotequote all
She had the ability to ease the turn, and should have done. However, she may have been doing so - wash can have a distinct effect on an 8s manoeuvrability...

Bloody shame, with no bias to either crew I was seriously impressed with Oxford's restart. Tight bladework, excellent power rhythm. Pulling half a length so quickly in a heavier boat and lighter crew is an achievement, and set them up for a win.

As for the swimmer, it's a pity Pinsett saw him, we could have seen how effective cleaver blades really are.

Busa mav

2,565 posts

155 months

Sunday 8th April 2012
quotequote all
Sway said:
She had the ability to ease the turn, and should have done. However, she may have been doing so - .
also consider that even if she was easing off the turn , given the calls from the umpire the Cambridge boat would/ should have been following the Oxford boat over to push them out of the turn .

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Sunday 8th April 2012
quotequote all
Sway said:
She had the ability to ease the turn, and should have done. However, she may have been doing so - wash can have a distinct effect on an 8s manoeuvrability...

Bloody shame, with no bias to either crew I was seriously impressed with Oxford's restart. Tight bladework, excellent power rhythm. Pulling half a length so quickly in a heavier boat and lighter crew is an achievement, and set them up for a win.

As for the swimmer, it's a pity Pinsett saw him, we could have seen how effective cleaver blades really are.
Sadly, they're not as effective as the first ever Dreissigacker blades in the mid-1980s. Those were banned after a year or so, because the blades were so thin that they were lethal to anything living that was in the water. There were supposedly incidents of sliced-up ducks. I used a set once ion pre-cleaver days and they were wonderful for the way they slipped in and out of the water at catch and finish.

Sway

26,419 posts

195 months

Sunday 8th April 2012
quotequote all
Busa mav said:
also consider that even if she was easing off the turn , given the calls from the umpire the Cambridge boat would/ should have been following the Oxford boat over to push them out of the turn .
Bloody right they would have been, it's the classic 'get out of jail' card any cox worth their weight will be playing. I love the tideway for it's navigational complexity - depending on start number, there's some interesting lines in the HoR, particularly after Hammersmith.

Which Cambridge position was in the clash with 6?

Busa mav

2,565 posts

155 months

Sunday 8th April 2012
quotequote all
Sway said:
Which Cambridge position was in the clash with 6?
Looks possibly 4 and 5 as they were rowing a cock eyed layout with 2, 4 and 5 on bow side.

piquet

614 posts

258 months

Sunday 8th April 2012
quotequote all
Zod said:
Sadly, they're not as effective as the first ever Dreissigacker blades in the mid-1980s. Those were banned after a year or so, because the blades were so thin that they were lethal to anything living that was in the water. There were supposedly incidents of sliced-up ducks. I used a set once ion pre-cleaver days and they were wonderful for the way they slipped in and out of the water at catch and finish.
yep, a guy a used to row with decapitated a duck during a race, he become pretty renowned for it

ajprice

27,680 posts

197 months

Sunday 8th April 2012
quotequote all
Busa mav said:
Looks possibly 4 and 5 as they were rowing a cock eyed layout with 2, 4 and 5 on bow side.
I noticed the odd layout, as I'm not a rowist, why would that be? Is it an oar layout that they just thought was better than every other to a side, or something to do with them being left or right handed?


AJLintern

4,207 posts

264 months

Sunday 8th April 2012
quotequote all
Don't think it has anything to do with handedness as there are still four on each side. I prefer rowing bow side as I find it easier to feather the blade with my left hand and it just feels more natural for some reason. Perhaps the guy selected for bow in the Cambridge boat preferred to row stroke side and they rearranged things accordingly? confused

tertius

6,860 posts

231 months

Sunday 8th April 2012
quotequote all
It is usually in order to balance differing power outputs - different seats exert a different turning moment on the boat, and sometimes you just can't get the boat to run straight with the normal configuration so you might try a rig like that.

Busa mav

2,565 posts

155 months

Sunday 8th April 2012
quotequote all
They may just have a need to shift some weight about in the boat.

I think it is gimmick though , but if they think it is doing something then all is good.

You would normally see it in a four where bow and stroke are one side , with 2 and 3 the other.


Looks like a woman at 5, so may be something to do with the power biggrin



Edited by Busa mav on Sunday 8th April 23:04

Highway Star

3,576 posts

232 months

Sunday 8th April 2012
quotequote all
My college 8 rowed with a 'frig' like that, our stroke was a bowsider but our two fat boys were strokesiders and went at 5 and 4, it just made sense for us that way and worked (div1 blades). There was another college that had a double frig, with 7 and 6 on the same side and then 5 and 4 on the same side, now that looked really strange.

ewenm

28,506 posts

246 months

Sunday 8th April 2012
quotequote all
Busa mav said:
Looks like a woman at 5, so may be something to do with the power biggrin
Apparently "he" hadn't cut his hair since being on the losing side last year...

TallbutBuxomly

12,254 posts

217 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
tertius said:
It is usually in order to balance differing power outputs - different seats exert a different turning moment on the boat, and sometimes you just can't get the boat to run straight with the normal configuration so you might try a rig like that.
This.

AlexiusG55

655 posts

157 months

Monday 9th April 2012
quotequote all
Zod said:
Sadly, they're not as effective as the first ever Dreissigacker blades in the mid-1980s. Those were banned after a year or so, because the blades were so thin that they were lethal to anything living that was in the water. There were supposedly incidents of sliced-up ducks. I used a set once ion pre-cleaver days and they were wonderful for the way they slipped in and out of the water at catch and finish.
Until a couple of years ago Concept2 Vortex Edge blades were banned for college clubs on the Cam, as the river's so narrow that blade clashes between boats going in opposite directions are commonplace (there are bits that are too narrow for 2 eights to pass without one pulling blades in). The pre-2009 blades are still outlawed.

AstonZagato

12,734 posts

211 months

Saturday 21st April 2012
quotequote all
I was sorry to miss it - a holiday meant that I have seen none of it.

When I was an oarsman, I hated the cox trying to steal water in a race. Once the blades are overlapping, it becomes a lottery, especially if both crews are of equal or similar experience. Clashes are just too unpredictable. As an oarsman, I wanted to beat the crew next to me by being better, fitter, stronger - and if we snapped a blade or lost our rhythm all my months of brutal training (we were doing 30 hours a week at times), I would not have been a happy bunny.

That said, I wouldn't want the cox to cede water to a crew. All I wanted to know was that I had the same stream - no worse. Then I was happy to flog myself to death.

RichB

51,741 posts

285 months

Saturday 21st April 2012
quotequote all
As this thread has reopened can I ask the experts a question; do they run the race on a rising tide? And if so why not time the start for the turn of the tide so there is no current? In that way there would be no advantage to either side? As I have never rowed what am I missing?

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Saturday 21st April 2012
quotequote all
Highway Star said:
My college 8 rowed with a 'frig' like that, our stroke was a bowsider but our two fat boys were strokesiders and went at 5 and 4, it just made sense for us that way and worked (div1 blades). There was another college that had a double frig, with 7 and 6 on the same side and then 5 and 4 on the same side, now that looked really strange.
It's about power and weight distribution. It's only done rarely.

I rowed in an eight with a bowside stroke for several years. The best stroke was better on bowside, so we rigged it that way.

HowMuchLonger

3,006 posts

194 months

Saturday 21st April 2012
quotequote all
RichB said:
As this thread has reopened can I ask the experts a question; do they run the race on a rising tide? And if so why not time the start for the turn of the tide so there is no current? In that way there would be no advantage to either side? As I have never rowed what am I missing?
The bit that you are missing is that there is always a current on the thames. smile

RichB

51,741 posts

285 months

Saturday 21st April 2012
quotequote all
HowMuchLonger said:
The bit that you are missing is that there is always a current on the thames. smile
Really? Having grown up in Kew and Hammersmith it appears from the bank that there is a period when the river is stationary

TallbutBuxomly

12,254 posts

217 months

Saturday 21st April 2012
quotequote all
RichB said:
eally? Having grown up in Kew and Hammersmith it appears from the bank that there is a period when the river is stationary
and the land either side of it moves instead?tongue out