Murray's Clearly Not Turning Into Henman mark II
Discussion
Justices said:
im said:
Justices: You've £3,500 riding on this match
This is really gonna hurt or you've got too much money chap.
Not this one, on the next This is really gonna hurt or you've got too much money chap.
The French Open?
IIRC you thought his best chance was either at this or the US Open.
The sets Djokovic won he won very comfortably.
Justices: Have you REALLY just done £3.5k on this match
No, REALLY REALLY, on Murray to win a particular tournament...Wow.
I was gonna offer to reduce the bet to £10 for you should Murray go out here but I feel I'd be insulting you.
Still, you've 3 bites of the cherry left, although the next up - the French - is almost unwinnable for Murray.
ETA: Perhaps I spoke too soon...
Justices: Have you REALLY just done £3.5k on this match
No, REALLY REALLY, on Murray to win a particular tournament...Wow.
I was gonna offer to reduce the bet to £10 for you should Murray go out here but I feel I'd be insulting you.
Still, you've 3 bites of the cherry left, although the next up - the French - is almost unwinnable for Murray.
ETA: Perhaps I spoke too soon...
Edited by im on Friday 27th January 13:18
ViperPict said:
To quantify how much of a better record Murray has (to date) than Henman, look at a time series of their world ranking position (perhaps 100-rank) over an eqivalent period and integrate that curve. I appreciate that's not exactly comparing like with like (Murray faces far stiffer opponents than Henman did) but it would a conservative metric of how much more Murray has already achieved than Henman.
Yep, no doubting Murray is far-far superior to 'Tiger' Tim ('Tiger' - yeah right)Unfortunately they don't give out Grand Slams for 'integrated curves' or 'conservative metrics'
Nice try though.
Gassing Station | Sports | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff