Just been suspended, disciplinary tomorrow.

Just been suspended, disciplinary tomorrow.

Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

122,165 posts

266 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
I'm more concerned about how the OP is feeling. He's gone very quiet.

singlecoil

33,854 posts

247 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I'm more concerned about how the OP is feeling. He's gone very quiet.
Indeed, but it's hardly surprising considering the 'good going over' that he's received here, much of it from PH regulars who seem to really enjoy putting the boot in. One wonders what it is about their own lives that makes them so keen to kick somebody when he's down (even/especially if it's his own fault). Let he who is without any mistakes in his own life cast the first stone.

zaphod42

50,760 posts

156 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I'm more concerned about how the OP is feeling. He's gone very quiet.
I think he said he was going to change his login so that he could separate this thread and others from future postings, which is fair I think...

aka_kerrly

12,432 posts

211 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
zaphod42 said:
Eric Mc said:
I'm more concerned about how the OP is feeling. He's gone very quiet.
I think he said he was going to change his login so that he could separate this thread and others from future postings, which is fair I think...
Perhaps his boss is on PH as well.

chiswick67

Original Poster:

4,193 posts

192 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
afternoon all... I am very much still on here, but have taken a review of my online anonymity, I have been watching this thread with interest. Am currently at home, licking my wounds, searching for a job. Will very much live to fight another day.

Peoples concern for me is not needed, but is very much appreciated.


aka_kerrly

12,432 posts

211 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
^ That is good, hopefully others will have learnt from your experience to.

Good luck on the job hunt!

KrazyIvan

4,341 posts

176 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
chiswick67 said:
afternoon all... I am very much still on here, but have taken a review of my online anonymity, I have been watching this thread with interest. Am currently at home, licking my wounds, searching for a job. Will very much live to fight another day.

Peoples concern for me is not needed, but is very much appreciated.

No I am hounslow1967.....just kidding, good luck with finding a new job

chiswick67

Original Poster:

4,193 posts

192 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
KrazyIvan said:
chiswick67 said:
afternoon all... I am very much still on here, but have taken a review of my online anonymity, I have been watching this thread with interest. Am currently at home, licking my wounds, searching for a job. Will very much live to fight another day.

Peoples concern for me is not needed, but is very much appreciated.

No I am hounslow1967.....just kidding, good luck with finding a new job
Cheers guys... I did not fully understand how the profiles etc on here worked, hence my reason for chucking up loads of different names... anyway, like I have said, I have rejoined now under an anonymous username, and we will be a tad more guarded on what I post in future.

Eric Mc

122,165 posts

266 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
Best of luck.

Mr Whippy

29,109 posts

242 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
chiswick67 said:
KrazyIvan said:
chiswick67 said:
afternoon all... I am very much still on here, but have taken a review of my online anonymity, I have been watching this thread with interest. Am currently at home, licking my wounds, searching for a job. Will very much live to fight another day.

Peoples concern for me is not needed, but is very much appreciated.

No I am hounslow1967.....just kidding, good luck with finding a new job
Cheers guys... I did not fully understand how the profiles etc on here worked, hence my reason for chucking up loads of different names... anyway, like I have said, I have rejoined now under an anonymous username, and we will be a tad more guarded on what I post in future.
You don't need an anonymous username really, just don't post private things on the internet. No matter how separated you think things are there are links from one profile to another elsewhere etc.

Keep questionable things that are to do with work away from any permanent media... especially media that can be googled!

Dave

Kermit power

28,732 posts

214 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
Jerry Can said:
Eric Mc said:
This is a new phenomnenon actually. Most people who move away, or even just move jobs, gradually allow old friends and aquaintances fade away as their lives are now following different paths. This has always been "the norm" and entirely natural.

its only a new phenomenon due to the requirement for worker mobility. back in the day, probably at a time you remember, most people grew up and lived and worked in the same town/area all their lives, and so never lost touch with their friends from school etc.

Bookface just redresses this balance in a 21st Century kind of way.
I think you've missed out the rise of the middle class.

Go back to the days of more or less a working class and a ruling class and yes, working class people would've stayed put their entire lives, whilst the ruling classes would've migrated between city and country depending on the time of year.

Move on into the 20th century though - especially the latter half of it - and the middle classes very much did have to move to get work. I grew up as a middle class kid in that era. We moved - always to move my father's career forward, and never less than 150 miles at a time - whilst my mother was pregnant with me, then again when I was 4, 11 & 15.

Now, however, despite having a very similar career to my father's, I can move jobs regularly without having to move locations. I will be able to give my kids the settled upbringing that I never had, and the only reason for this is improvements in technology which mean that I can work as part of a virtual team, rather than having to be in the same office as everyone else.

Yes, people need to be somewhere with decent transport links and broadband speed, but once you've got that, I'd say job mobility (the ability to do your job anywhere) has largely replaced worker mobility.

V8mate

45,899 posts

190 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
chiswick67 said:
Sheets Tabuer said:
So is there anything in your T&C about social networking sites?
Don't wont to go into the long and short of it, but lets just say, there was more to this than meets the eye. I will not post full details on an open forum for obvious reasons....



grumpy
Why not? Your former employer is now fair game. Get out there and rubbish 'em to death biggrin

Eric Mc

122,165 posts

266 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
Jerry Can said:
its only a new phenomenon due to the requirement for worker mobility. back in the day, probably at a time you remember, most people grew up and lived and worked in the same town/area all their lives, and so never lost touch with their friends from school etc.

Bookface just redresses this balance in a 21st Century kind of way.


Maybe the English have been reluctant to move around to look for work but the Irish have done this for centuries. My dad (born 1928) worked all over the world on ships and worked for a number of years in London. Many of his generation emigrated - as I did in the 1980s.

So, my memory is of a time and people who were quite willing to move about to find work.

Pothole

34,367 posts

283 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Jerry Can said:
its only a new phenomenon due to the requirement for worker mobility. back in the day, probably at a time you remember, most people grew up and lived and worked in the same town/area all their lives, and so never lost touch with their friends from school etc.

Bookface just redresses this balance in a 21st Century kind of way.


Maybe the English have been reluctant to move around to look for work but the Irish have done this for centuries. My dad (born 1928) worked all over the world on ships and worked for a number of years in London. Many of his generation emigrated - as I did in the 1980s.

So, my memory is of a time and people who were quite willing to move about to find work.
A time and a totally different place...Although my own Father joined the Royal Navy at 16, the Merchant Navy in the 50s and the Foreign Office in the 60s. He got about a bit.

Eric Mc

122,165 posts

266 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
Pothole said:
Eric Mc said:
Jerry Can said:
its only a new phenomenon due to the requirement for worker mobility. back in the day, probably at a time you remember, most people grew up and lived and worked in the same town/area all their lives, and so never lost touch with their friends from school etc.

Bookface just redresses this balance in a 21st Century kind of way.


Maybe the English have been reluctant to move around to look for work but the Irish have done this for centuries. My dad (born 1928) worked all over the world on ships and worked for a number of years in London. Many of his generation emigrated - as I did in the 1980s.

So, my memory is of a time and people who were quite willing to move about to find work.
A time and a totally different place...Although my own Father joined the Royal Navy at 16, the Merchant Navy in the 50s and the Foreign Office in the 60s. He got about a bit.
So, are you saying that people in earlier times WERE willing to travel to find work? If so, you are more or less agreeing with me and disagreeing with the assertion that was madeI that somehow I belonged to a time where people DIDN'T travel to find work.

I'm not THAT ancient. I don't come from a time where people spent there entire lives in a village and married their cousins.


Conian

8,030 posts

202 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
it's harder to move around now, you cant just show up in a town and find a place to live, renting a place seems to take 6 weeks while agreements are drawn up and references sorted out, deposits and rents are so big that you need a few £1000 to get a place.
times they are a changing.

NorthernBoy

12,642 posts

258 months

Monday 3rd October 2011
quotequote all
Pothole said:
ongratulations! Do you truly believe the rest of the world should be just like you, or are you prepared to entertain a little variety?
Interestingly, it was fear of being just like him (living in Farnborough) that made me hand in my notice at the Royal Aerospace Establishment, move to London without two brass farthings to rub together, and start all over again.

It's a bit funny that I now find myself being looked down on as "a bit sad" by someone living my nightmare.

Eric Mc

122,165 posts

266 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Farnborough is brilliant. I wouldn't live anywhere else.

It's even got a pub.

Don1

15,963 posts

209 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Same old story - the strongest, yet weakest part of the Information Security sphere is the person.

OP, sorry to hear of your loss, but I'm glad that you're learning a lesson. Others would be wise to pay heed.

Pothole

34,367 posts

283 months

Tuesday 4th October 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Pothole said:
Eric Mc said:
Jerry Can said:
its only a new phenomenon due to the requirement for worker mobility. back in the day, probably at a time you remember, most people grew up and lived and worked in the same town/area all their lives, and so never lost touch with their friends from school etc.

Bookface just redresses this balance in a 21st Century kind of way.


Maybe the English have been reluctant to move around to look for work but the Irish have done this for centuries. My dad (born 1928) worked all over the world on ships and worked for a number of years in London. Many of his generation emigrated - as I did in the 1980s.

So, my memory is of a time and people who were quite willing to move about to find work.
A time and a totally different place...Although my own Father joined the Royal Navy at 16, the Merchant Navy in the 50s and the Foreign Office in the 60s. He got about a bit.
So, are you saying that people in earlier times WERE willing to travel to find work? If so, you are more or less agreeing with me and disagreeing with the assertion that was madeI that somehow I belonged to a time where people DIDN'T travel to find work.

I'm not THAT ancient. I don't come from a time where people spent there entire lives in a village and married their cousins.
You sure your parents weren't cousins? It would explain a lot in this thread.