Views required on 3 watches

Views required on 3 watches

Author
Discussion

bermyandy

Original Poster:

2,050 posts

219 months

Vesuvius 996

35,829 posts

272 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
bermyandy said:



Panerai always look best plain to me, so the third one, thanks.

Irish

3,991 posts

240 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
bermyandy said:


There is/was a very nice panerai for sale on chrono24 which looks like it is from someone in the city if you are interested:

www.chrono24.com/web/en/suchen/u/index.htm?showid=1250115&SUCH_PBIS=5000&SUCH_PWAEHR=GBP&STANDORTLAND_ID=UK&MODELL=Panerai&SORTIERUNG=1&myattstring=103@104@&lastshow=0&anzahlgesamt=1

I would go with the Panerai.

jamieboy

5,911 posts

230 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
None of them really do it for me, but I'd probably take the IWC.

I prefer the plainer Panerais to the two that you've chosen, but I'd also probably prefer a stainless steel Aquatimer chrono-automatic with the silver markings to the Titanium split minute one.

grumbledoak

31,575 posts

234 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
Not a fan of the IWC (that model, not the watches in general).

Of the two Panerai I'd have to have the power reserve function, though I know it isn't a particularly useful feature. If you get #3 you'll wish you'd spent that little more to get the "doo-dad", IMO.

maxf

8,411 posts

242 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
The IWC is the split minute and the most 'complicated' of the 3. Its a neat feature but if you aren't going to use it you could save yourself £2.5k (IIRC) you could buy the aquatimer chronograph which looks identical ( www.blitzwatches.co.uk/productdetail.asp?productid=1439 ) (although doesn't have the split minute function). With the change buy a 2nd hand Panerai!

The IWC is much smaller than the Panerai's if that matters (ie if you have popeye arms )


Edited by maxf on Wednesday 2nd May 12:04



Edited by maxf on Wednesday 2nd May 12:04

johnfm

13,668 posts

251 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
I'd have an IWC over a Panerai - but not that one - but to each their own. It depends on what you like in a watch - all tastes are different! Good luck either way...

jamieboy

5,911 posts

230 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
maxf said:
The IWC is much smaller than the Panerai's if that matters (ie if you have popeye arms )
It's deceptive, they're both 44mm. Having previously only seen it in pictures, when I tried the Aquatimer chrono on I was suprised how big it was compared to my PAM 0111, and the chrono is smaller than the split-minute.

hutchingsp

51,843 posts

211 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
How about the cheaper IWC and a plain Luminor Base or similar.. two for one..

bermyandy

Original Poster:

2,050 posts

219 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
hutchingsp said:
How about the cheaper IWC and a plain Luminor Base or similar.. two for one..


The cheaper IWC, I assume you mean without the split minute, just looks that little bit too small for my liking - the reason for likeing the split minute one is just that its that little bit chunkier

They do it in a black and white, if the yellow is an issue for some on that one?

jamieboy

5,911 posts

230 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
bermyandy said:
They do it in a black and white, if the yellow is an issue for some on that one?
Do they? I know my catalogue is out of date, but they only show the split-minute in yellow on their website.

I think the chrono-automatic with yellow is titanium and the one with grey/white is stainless steel, but I could be wrong.


Edited by jamieboy on Wednesday 2nd May 12:59

bermyandy

Original Poster:

2,050 posts

219 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
jamieboy said:
bermyandy said:
They do it in a black and white, if the yellow is an issue for some on that one?
Do they? I know my catalogue is out of date, but they only show the split-minute in yellow on their website.

I think the chrono-automatic with yellow is titanium and the one with grey/white is stainless steel, but I could be wrong.


Edited by jamieboy on Wednesday 2nd May 12:59


Ah very true... I think i just assumed as they did the smaller one in yellow or black, they would do the same on the larger one

maxf

8,411 posts

242 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
jamieboy said:
maxf said:
The IWC is much smaller than the Panerai's if that matters (ie if you have popeye arms )
It's deceptive, they're both 44mm. Having previously only seen it in pictures, when I tried the Aquatimer chrono on I was suprised how big it was compared to my PAM 0111, and the chrono is smaller than the split-minute.


Ah, apologies. I thought the split minute was thicker rather than 'bigger'. How about an IWC Portuguese? Not as sporty but pretty timeless (in terms of looks, not functionality ) - www.blitzwatches.co.uk/productdetail.asp?productid=1518

bermyandy

Original Poster:

2,050 posts

219 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
maxf said:
jamieboy said:
maxf said:
The IWC is much smaller than the Panerai's if that matters (ie if you have popeye arms )
It's deceptive, they're both 44mm. Having previously only seen it in pictures, when I tried the Aquatimer chrono on I was suprised how big it was compared to my PAM 0111, and the chrono is smaller than the split-minute.


Ah, apologies. I thought the split minute was thicker rather than 'bigger'. How about an IWC Portuguese? Not as sporty but pretty timeless (in terms of looks, not functionality ) - www.blitzwatches.co.uk/productdetail.asp?productid=1518


Would need to be a metal strap - leather ones always go a bit minging!

flow99

1,246 posts

209 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
Best thing is to try them on, pays your money and takes your choice!

Noted comments regarding size, I have a few watches, amongst them are two 44mm IWC's and a 44mm Panerai. Whilst the case diameter is comparable, the Panerai feels much larger due to apparent extra thickness and with the locking mecanism over the winder.

Hope it helps?

Vesuvius 996

35,829 posts

272 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all

Spent a happy half hour in Watches of Switzerland in the City today.

Tried on a White Gold Daytona.

:horn:


Them Panerai's are cool, man!!




Edited by Vesuvius 996 on Wednesday 2nd May 17:54

bermyandy

Original Poster:

2,050 posts

219 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
Vesuvius 996 said:

Spent a happy half hour in Watches of Switzerland in the City today.

Tried on a White Gold Daytona.

:horn:


Them Panerai's are cool, man!!




Edited by Vesuvius 996 on Wednesday 2nd May 17:54


Did they have any metal strapped panerais?

F1sh

262 posts

226 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
Would have to take the IWC myself.

F1sh

tertius

6,861 posts

231 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
F1sh said:
Would have to take the IWC myself.

F1sh


If I was forced to, I'd take the IWC as well, but there are many watches I'd prefer over any of those.

bermyandy

Original Poster:

2,050 posts

219 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
had a small change and went for this in the end

www.blitzwatches.co.uk/productdetail.asp?productid=1440