UARS Satellite re-entry

Author
Discussion

davepoth

29,395 posts

201 months

Thursday 22nd September 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
If they are orbiting in a vacuum at about absolute zero, what can cooling do?
It's surprisingly difficult to get rid of heat in a vacuum.

Simpo Two

85,883 posts

267 months

Thursday 22nd September 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
It's surprisingly difficult to get rid of heat in a vacuum.
Radiation seems to work for the sun smile

And if the heat of the reactor is absorbed by the sodium, how does that then dissipate its heat? Surface area has no role (I think) as that's a convection thing.

davepoth

29,395 posts

201 months

Thursday 22nd September 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Radiation seems to work for the sun smile

And if the heat of the reactor is absorbed by the sodium, how does that then dissipate its heat? Surface area has no role (I think) as that's a convection thing.
Three methods of losing heat - conduction, convection and radiation. Only radiation works in space, so the radiators need to be a lot larger than they would be on earth. Anyway, that's why sodium cooled - sodium can get massively hotter than water while remaining liquid meaning it can remove more heat energy from the core.

Sheets Tabuer

19,161 posts

217 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
How accurate is stellarium?

Been tracking it on there for a few days and it's getting lower, it also indicated the same height as the nasa page yesterday.

Eric Mc

122,332 posts

267 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Simpo Two said:
If they are orbiting in a vacuum at about absolute zero, what can cooling do?
It's surprisingly difficult to get rid of heat in a vacuum.
Absolutely. The Space Shuttle's biggest issue once in orbit was getting rid of excess heat generated by the chemical reactions going on in the Fuel Cells.

It was absolutely essential that the Shuttle opened its cargo bay doors within about 40 to 60 minutes of reaching orbit. Inside the cargo bay doors were huge radiators. If those doors couldn't be opened for any reason, the Shuttle would start to overheat and the mission would have to be aborted.


In this picture you can see the radiator surfaces on the inner face of the cargo bay doors -


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

56 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
BuzzLightyear said:
A little research shows that UARS (YouArse?)
That's the story here, never mind that there is a 1:3500 chance someone is going to get hit by space debris in the great re entry lottery.

The best part is that someone called a satellite 'you arse'. hehe

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

56 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
What time is it all going to arrive?

Eric Mc

122,332 posts

267 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
el stovey said:
BuzzLightyear said:
A little research shows that UARS (YouArse?)
That's the story here, never mind that there is a 1:3500 chance someone is going to get hit by space debris in the great re entry lottery.

The best part is that someone called a satellite 'you arse'. hehe
It takes a warped mind to notice that smile

rufusruffcutt

1,539 posts

207 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
Last update from NASA:

"Fri, 23 Sep 2011 03:01:35 AM GMT

As of 9:30 p.m. EDT Sept. 22, 2011, the orbit of UARS was 110 mi by 115 mi (175 km by 185 km). Re-entry is possible sometime during the afternoon or early evening of Sept. 23, Eastern Daylight Time. The satellite will not be passing over North America during that time period. It is still too early to predict the time and location of re-entry with any more certainty, but predictions will become more refined in the next 24 hours."

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/uars/index.html

The live tracking site is struggling with internet overload at the moment:

http://www.n2yo.com/

This all reminds me of Skylabs re-entry in '79 over Australia.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

56 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
rufusruffcutt said:
Last update from NASA:

. . . .The satellite will not be passing over North America during that time period. . .
Funny that . .

Simpo Two

85,883 posts

267 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Three methods of losing heat - conduction, convection and radiation. Only radiation works in space, so the radiators need to be a lot larger than they would be on earth. Anyway, that's why sodium cooled - sodium can get massively hotter than water while remaining liquid meaning it can remove more heat energy from the core.
Right, so the heat gradient between the hot sodium and cold space is greater. Gottit.

What stops the heat soaking back into whatever it is that is wanting to be cooled?

Eric Mc

122,332 posts

267 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
If it hits me, will it cause me to me to burst into flames too?

Simpo Two

85,883 posts

267 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
If it hits me, will it cause me to me to burst into flames too?
At last you'll be able to 'write yourself off' hehe

Sonic

4,007 posts

209 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Not sure i agree with that...

The chance of you winning the lottery is 1 in ~14 million.

The chance of the satellite hitting a person (i.e anybody) is 1 in 3,200. There are ~7 billion people in the world, so the chance of it hitting you specifically, based on the previous statistic, is 1 in ~22.4 trillion.

And besides, there's no roll-over if it doesn't hit anybody!

Edited by Sonic on Friday 23 September 12:48

Simpo Two

85,883 posts

267 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
The other great misunderstanding of the statistic (R4 this morning) was that since there are 9 billion people on Earth, then at odds of one in 3,200, it meant 2,812,500 people would be killed...

Everybody should learn some stats at school.

Man-At-Arms

5,914 posts

181 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
Sonic said:
And besides, there's no roll-over if it doesn't hit anybody!
rofl

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

264 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
So no further info as to location?

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

264 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
Sheets Tabuer said:
How accurate is stellarium?

Been tracking it on there for a few days and it's getting lower, it also indicated the same height as the nasa page yesterday.
banghead What catalogue did you load up for that?

Scottydon

107 posts

190 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all

Eric Mc

122,332 posts

267 months

Friday 23rd September 2011
quotequote all
Thanks for the link.