The Apprentice 2024
Discussion
Doofus said:
williamp said:
..they've also got the antisemitism diversity box ticked
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/31/appren...
Odd they still let him on the show. Others they would have been...removed
Isn't Seralan Jewish?https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/31/appren...
Odd they still let him on the show. Others they would have been...removed
tim0409 said:
Doofus said:
williamp said:
..they've also got the antisemitism diversity box ticked
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/31/appren...
Odd they still let him on the show. Others they would have been...removed
Isn't Seralan Jewish?https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/31/appren...
Odd they still let him on the show. Others they would have been...removed
2HFL said:
Gave it half an hour, with Shugs regurgitating his dire jokes and everyone obediently laughing along, followed by the usual cluster of a task, literally no change from any other series.
So, that was enough for me, I won’t be wasting my Thursday nights watching it..
Did better than me, I lasted ten minutes and just thought 'fk this!'. So, that was enough for me, I won’t be wasting my Thursday nights watching it..
Tyrell Corp said:
A 'colouful' bunch, I'm all for diversity, but no way is that an accurate representation of UK. I think they are seriously over-egging it now.
(some cultures perhaps more entrepreneurial by nature, coupled with sociological factors so some ethnic minorities will naturally be over-represented in business...i get it)
Radec said:
Lads are losing this task, PM with no clue.
Leave Rishi Sunak alone, he's trying his best It was a poor show, surprised the guy survived after the "event" that was laid on. Scottish dancing in a field whilst wearing chinos with no music playing just was odd. I'm sure the usual tasks (tearing around London streets trying to buy obscure tat / making pet food / app for kids) will feature
Edited by CourtAgain on Saturday 3rd February 19:25
Tycho said:
Just watched it on catchup and can't believe the PM didn't get fired. He was the worst of a bad bunch. The series needs to go back to a job rather than an investment so he has an incentive to fire the worst candidate rather than keep them in because he likes the look of their business plan. Not one ounce of initiative or common sense between the lot of them. I wouldn't like to be treated by the medical "professionals" in the group.
There was one candidate in the previous series who labelled himself as "The James Bond of the business world".asfault said:
blueg33 said:
Business plans should only be submitted at the end of the process
Ha yeah I think sur allen made that mistake when he realised sometimes a good candidate got through with a crap business.Actually he did have a plan... IIRC it was for a fixed-fee online estate agency, but ahead of its time, so Sugar, Hewer, Claude et al couldn't comprehend it.
Within a year Purple Bricks was on the scene.
I didn't expect Elon Musk to get fired.
Why does Lord Sugar always fire people 'with regret'?
When all the teams are back in the boardroom with Lord Sugar, why do the candidates bicker with their team leaders trying to allocate blame for failure, when at that point the losing team hasn't been identified and that teams leader is yet to choose the two coming back with them? Surely they are putting themselves up being chosen? Personally I'd lick the team leaders arse so I wasn't chosen.
I reckon they should have a series of The Apprentice completely made up of all the candidates that have been fired in the first episode.
Why does Lord Sugar always fire people 'with regret'?
When all the teams are back in the boardroom with Lord Sugar, why do the candidates bicker with their team leaders trying to allocate blame for failure, when at that point the losing team hasn't been identified and that teams leader is yet to choose the two coming back with them? Surely they are putting themselves up being chosen? Personally I'd lick the team leaders arse so I wasn't chosen.
I reckon they should have a series of The Apprentice completely made up of all the candidates that have been fired in the first episode.
Edited by The Gauge on Saturday 3rd February 23:47
Bluedot said:
Looks like they've acknowledged peoples gripes with it just being Love Island in suits, maybe we'll get a more rounded bunch of contestants this year.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-6810...
Yet still ridiculous tasks that have nothing to do with business (dude gets fired for making brownies, seriously? Pretty much the only food that wasn't a disaster). Still the forced lack of communication between sub-teams to ramp up the drama/incompetence.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-6810...
The tray bake toad in the hole (some sausages, some batter) that they had to cook themselves for something stupid like £60 a head quoted. It's so far removed from reality it's a parody of itself now.
Will give it one more episode but if anything they seem to have ramped up the 'reality' show aspect of it.
Edited by Ancient Wheelbarrow on Monday 5th February 07:39
vixen1700 said:
2HFL said:
Gave it half an hour, with Shugs regurgitating his dire jokes and everyone obediently laughing along, followed by the usual cluster of a task, literally no change from any other series.
So, that was enough for me, I won’t be wasting my Thursday nights watching it..
Did better than me, I lasted ten minutes and just thought 'fk this!'. So, that was enough for me, I won’t be wasting my Thursday nights watching it..
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff