Theres a load of nekkidness on C4
Discussion
philthy said:
As I said, modern day bogeyman.
If this actually happened (not doubting you, just not read about it anywhere), imagine how many other people now have these images on their hard drives? There is no defence.
There is a world of difference between a 14 year old posting images of herself on the internet, and someone torturing a child and photographing it.
Except in UK law.
I'm only going what I read on a random Yahoo article.If this actually happened (not doubting you, just not read about it anywhere), imagine how many other people now have these images on their hard drives? There is no defence.
There is a world of difference between a 14 year old posting images of herself on the internet, and someone torturing a child and photographing it.
Except in UK law.
I have no idea if it's true or an apocryphal tale. Apparently she is being charged using Megans Law, much to the annoyance of the family that campaigned to have it introduced in the first place. Even they, having gone through what they did, realise this absurd.
loltolhurst said:
completely agree and am sure many people have them on their hard drives unfortunately - just look at how many people are arrested for other things and images are discovered. a 18 year old with pics of his 17 year old girlfriend could be charged for example and labelled a paedo.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5...
Interesting to read that the mother of the girl whom "Megans" law is named after, wants the 14 year old in the article treated differently.http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5...
Would she want a 50 year old male with those pictures on his hard drive, however innocently, to be treated differently?
Fittster said:
BJG1 said:
do old women really look like that? I'm 20 and am now really not looking forward to 10 years time!
, when you get to 30 you'll have to consider 40 year old women!
What a load of sensationalist, unrealistic and confusing (for the poor mites) b
ks. Where do I start?
How about; Body Image. What the hell were those wonky swamp donkeys for? To say that everyone is an ugly, lumpy, hairy, droopy rotter when nekkid? OK, most girls are not the inflate-a-date, orange, enhanced, blond slag star of some porn – and good on em; personally I hate that look - but they made out that ALL porn portrays women like this. Wrong; only porn that caters for the fapper that likes inflate-a-date, orange, enhanced, blond slag porn stars have these types of 'women' in it. If internet porn teaches us anything it is that the human race and our sexual perversions are so massively diverse and horrifically wide ranging that there really is porn of everything, not just your gravity defying, Y shaped, coked up we bint. I know why they used those foul trogs in the show; how many women do you know that are happy to stand up in front of a few hundred giggling, sniggering brats? It seems only desperate, mothering, thatch heavy, lop sided, wobbly, hippy types are.
Porn. People will go and look for what they like, no matter how depraved or wrong it seems to you; you can't dictate what a person finds attractive. There is a very good evolutionary reason why most lads like athletic bodies, symmetrical, pert and large tits and youthful vaginas that don't look like a dropped pie or a guerrilla autopsy. It is normal to find this appealing because it is built into our genes. The examples used in the show were terribly biased. 9 pictures of mangled spaniel’s ears and one picture of a pair of ridiculous inflatable jumper lumps? Of course everyone will gravitate toward the enhanced pair. Why did they not have a true reflection of tits through the whole spectrum of size, shape and symmetry rather than the two extremes? That is teaching the wrong message, warping the world view the wrong way, and I find it simply irresponsible.
And to harp on about shaving down there? What the fk? Why not get at men for shaving their faces? We do it because most girls like it smooth and it make us look younger. Or why not get at girls shaving their armpits? Or why not just attack general personal hygiene? I bet that presenter bint, with more makeup than face, has a plucked clunge, so I found it a bit hypocritical her quizzing the yoof about the style of their pubic region. Let people do whatever the feck they want. Shaving is shaving, be it on your face or your biff – what the hell is the problem and why bring it up? She should have asked the little idiots about some of those haircuts! Astonishing st.
Kids and Porn. They will see it, it is not accidental and they do not innocently stumble upon it. They ACTIVELY look for it; you looked for it when you were their age so why should they be any different? Regardless of where it comes from, as soon as those grubby little urges sprout forth they will go a looking. In my day it was some grotty old grumble mags found in the woods, or stolen from under the mattress of mate’s older brother, and traded on the playground. Today it is on the internet, mobile pones and on the telly. It is far easier to get hold of; but isn’t everything nowadays – it’s called civilisation, progress, enlightenment and technology. In a liberal, advanced society it is inevitable, and welcome. I say let em learn. Curiosity and learning is what being a kid is all about. Parents are always naive as to the true goings on in their kid’s bedroom / playground / pants / mind. They are dirty little fkers just like you and me and they will look at porn, smoke, drink, take drugs and fk. Why? They are human, dumb, and curious like the rest of us. “Not my little Mackenzie / Destiny!” I hear you scream. Yes, I am afraid so.
And then the true message of the show; some misguided, poorly informed and impossible to implement campaign against porn on the internet. The internet makes a mockery out of the UK censorship laws; it has broken down barriers and is totally free to all to contribute, including the wronguns of this world. Ignorance of its scope and the technology involved is not an excuse; if she and parents can’t grasp why it is near impossible to restrict access to a clever kid then don’t preach about what you don’t understand and can’t change. Rather than idiotically demanding the impossible, why don’t you (or your researchers) learn the truth and present it in a non-sensationalist manner? The acronym PC means Personal Computer. This is amazingly accurate; as soon as you get a PC you can do whatever the feck you want to it. It is infinitely alterable in hardware and software so no measures by PCfkingWorld is going to stop you doing whatever the hell you want. Here is another truism; kids are determined and probably cleverer than you, so they will easily bypass your weak, ill-informed and pathetic attempts to block them.
And the moronic, melodramatic, ‘shocking’ revelation that there is kiddy porn freely and quickly available on the net was obviously put in to tug at the Maddie softened, JAIDS infected bleeding hearts of this idiotic country. After an extensive flogging-on career I have never stumbled upon this sort of material, even in some pretty dark recesses of the internet. I am under no illusion it is there, as I said above there is porn of everything, but maybe I have not seen it because I don’t go looking for it. She should be asked a few questions by the authorities because you need to have a focused delve into some pretty bad places to get to that kind of wrong on screen.
As you can tell I am a little angry at this hypocritical, sensationalist, simplistic, diluted, confusing and pointless attack on a natural part of human sexuality and technology. I thought it may be informative and funny, but alas – I was wrong. I think the next instalment is on later today. My bladder is already simmering away nicely so lets see if I can get a whistling cock by tonight.
Oh, and should I send a version of this rant to the producers of Channel 4?
ks. Where do I start? How about; Body Image. What the hell were those wonky swamp donkeys for? To say that everyone is an ugly, lumpy, hairy, droopy rotter when nekkid? OK, most girls are not the inflate-a-date, orange, enhanced, blond slag star of some porn – and good on em; personally I hate that look - but they made out that ALL porn portrays women like this. Wrong; only porn that caters for the fapper that likes inflate-a-date, orange, enhanced, blond slag porn stars have these types of 'women' in it. If internet porn teaches us anything it is that the human race and our sexual perversions are so massively diverse and horrifically wide ranging that there really is porn of everything, not just your gravity defying, Y shaped, coked up w
e bint. I know why they used those foul trogs in the show; how many women do you know that are happy to stand up in front of a few hundred giggling, sniggering brats? It seems only desperate, mothering, thatch heavy, lop sided, wobbly, hippy types are.Porn. People will go and look for what they like, no matter how depraved or wrong it seems to you; you can't dictate what a person finds attractive. There is a very good evolutionary reason why most lads like athletic bodies, symmetrical, pert and large tits and youthful vaginas that don't look like a dropped pie or a guerrilla autopsy. It is normal to find this appealing because it is built into our genes. The examples used in the show were terribly biased. 9 pictures of mangled spaniel’s ears and one picture of a pair of ridiculous inflatable jumper lumps? Of course everyone will gravitate toward the enhanced pair. Why did they not have a true reflection of tits through the whole spectrum of size, shape and symmetry rather than the two extremes? That is teaching the wrong message, warping the world view the wrong way, and I find it simply irresponsible.
And to harp on about shaving down there? What the f
k? Why not get at men for shaving their faces? We do it because most girls like it smooth and it make us look younger. Or why not get at girls shaving their armpits? Or why not just attack general personal hygiene? I bet that presenter bint, with more makeup than face, has a plucked clunge, so I found it a bit hypocritical her quizzing the yoof about the style of their pubic region. Let people do whatever the feck they want. Shaving is shaving, be it on your face or your biff – what the hell is the problem and why bring it up? She should have asked the little idiots about some of those haircuts! Astonishing st.Kids and Porn. They will see it, it is not accidental and they do not innocently stumble upon it. They ACTIVELY look for it; you looked for it when you were their age so why should they be any different? Regardless of where it comes from, as soon as those grubby little urges sprout forth they will go a looking. In my day it was some grotty old grumble mags found in the woods, or stolen from under the mattress of mate’s older brother, and traded on the playground. Today it is on the internet, mobile pones and on the telly. It is far easier to get hold of; but isn’t everything nowadays – it’s called civilisation, progress, enlightenment and technology. In a liberal, advanced society it is inevitable, and welcome. I say let em learn. Curiosity and learning is what being a kid is all about. Parents are always naive as to the true goings on in their kid’s bedroom / playground / pants / mind. They are dirty little f
kers just like you and me and they will look at porn, smoke, drink, take drugs and fk. Why? They are human, dumb, and curious like the rest of us. “Not my little Mackenzie / Destiny!” I hear you scream. Yes, I am afraid so.And then the true message of the show; some misguided, poorly informed and impossible to implement campaign against porn on the internet. The internet makes a mockery out of the UK censorship laws; it has broken down barriers and is totally free to all to contribute, including the wronguns of this world. Ignorance of its scope and the technology involved is not an excuse; if she and parents can’t grasp why it is near impossible to restrict access to a clever kid then don’t preach about what you don’t understand and can’t change. Rather than idiotically demanding the impossible, why don’t you (or your researchers) learn the truth and present it in a non-sensationalist manner? The acronym PC means Personal Computer. This is amazingly accurate; as soon as you get a PC you can do whatever the feck you want to it. It is infinitely alterable in hardware and software so no measures by PCf
kingWorld is going to stop you doing whatever the hell you want. Here is another truism; kids are determined and probably cleverer than you, so they will easily bypass your weak, ill-informed and pathetic attempts to block them.And the moronic, melodramatic, ‘shocking’ revelation that there is kiddy porn freely and quickly available on the net was obviously put in to tug at the Maddie softened, JAIDS infected bleeding hearts of this idiotic country. After an extensive flogging-on career I have never stumbled upon this sort of material, even in some pretty dark recesses of the internet. I am under no illusion it is there, as I said above there is porn of everything, but maybe I have not seen it because I don’t go looking for it. She should be asked a few questions by the authorities because you need to have a focused delve into some pretty bad places to get to that kind of wrong on screen.
As you can tell I am a little angry at this hypocritical, sensationalist, simplistic, diluted, confusing and pointless attack on a natural part of human sexuality and technology. I thought it may be informative and funny, but alas – I was wrong. I think the next instalment is on later today. My bladder is already simmering away nicely so lets see if I can get a whistling cock by tonight.
Oh, and should I send a version of this rant to the producers of Channel 4?
spandexx said:
What a load of sensationalist, unrealistic and confusing (for the poor mites) bks. Where do I start?
.......
My bladder is already simmering away nicely so lets see if I can get a whistling cock by tonight.
ks. Where do I start? .......
My bladder is already simmering away nicely so lets see if I can get a whistling cock by tonight.
That must be one of the best rants I have read. It's the willy show tonight so you should fit in well if you can make yours whistle!
I quite liked number2 on the line up last night
tonyvid said:
spandexx said:
What a load of sensationalist, unrealistic and confusing (for the poor mites) bks. Where do I start?
.......
My bladder is already simmering away nicely so lets see if I can get a whistling cock by tonight.
ks. Where do I start? .......
My bladder is already simmering away nicely so lets see if I can get a whistling cock by tonight.
That must be one of the best rants I have read. It's the willy show tonight so you should fit in well if you can make yours whistle!
I quite liked number2 on the line up last night
AstonV12 said:
spandexx said:
What a load of sensationalist, unrealistic and confusing (for the poor mites) bks. Where do I start?
How about; Body Image. What the hell were those wonky swamp donkeys for? To say that everyone is an ugly, lumpy, hairy, droopy rotter when nekkid? OK, most girls are not the inflate-a-date, orange, enhanced, blond slag star of some porn – and good on em; personally I hate that look - but they made out that ALL porn portrays women like this. Wrong; only porn that caters for the fapper that likes inflate-a-date, orange, enhanced, blond slag porn stars have these types of 'women' in it. If internet porn teaches us anything it is that the human race and our sexual perversions are so massively diverse and horrifically wide ranging that there really is porn of everything, not just your gravity defying, Y shaped, coked up we bint. I know why they used those foul trogs in the show; how many women do you know that are happy to stand up in front of a few hundred giggling, sniggering brats? It seems only desperate, mothering, thatch heavy, lop sided, wobbly, hippy types are.
Porn. People will go and look for what they like, no matter how depraved or wrong it seems to you; you can't dictate what a person finds attractive. There is a very good evolutionary reason why most lads like athletic bodies, symmetrical, pert and large tits and youthful vaginas that don't look like a dropped pie or a guerrilla autopsy. It is normal to find this appealing because it is built into our genes. The examples used in the show were terribly biased. 9 pictures of mangled spaniel’s ears and one picture of a pair of ridiculous inflatable jumper lumps? Of course everyone will gravitate toward the enhanced pair. Why did they not have a true reflection of tits through the whole spectrum of size, shape and symmetry rather than the two extremes? That is teaching the wrong message, warping the world view the wrong way, and I find it simply irresponsible.
And to harp on about shaving down there? What the fk? Why not get at men for shaving their faces? We do it because most girls like it smooth and it make us look younger. Or why not get at girls shaving their armpits? Or why not just attack general personal hygiene? I bet that presenter bint, with more makeup than face, has a plucked clunge, so I found it a bit hypocritical her quizzing the yoof about the style of their pubic region. Let people do whatever the feck they want. Shaving is shaving, be it on your face or your biff – what the hell is the problem and why bring it up? She should have asked the little idiots about some of those haircuts! Astonishing st.
Kids and Porn. They will see it, it is not accidental and they do not innocently stumble upon it. They ACTIVELY look for it; you looked for it when you were their age so why should they be any different? Regardless of where it comes from, as soon as those grubby little urges sprout forth they will go a looking. In my day it was some grotty old grumble mags found in the woods, or stolen from under the mattress of mate’s older brother, and traded on the playground. Today it is on the internet, mobile pones and on the telly. It is far easier to get hold of; but isn’t everything nowadays – it’s called civilisation, progress, enlightenment and technology. In a liberal, advanced society it is inevitable, and welcome. I say let em learn. Curiosity and learning is what being a kid is all about. Parents are always naive as to the true goings on in their kid’s bedroom / playground / pants / mind. They are dirty little fkers just like you and me and they will look at porn, smoke, drink, take drugs and fk. Why? They are human, dumb, and curious like the rest of us. “Not my little Mackenzie / Destiny!” I hear you scream. Yes, I am afraid so.
And then the true message of the show; some misguided, poorly informed and impossible to implement campaign against porn on the internet. The internet makes a mockery out of the UK censorship laws; it has broken down barriers and is totally free to all to contribute, including the wronguns of this world. Ignorance of its scope and the technology involved is not an excuse; if she and parents can’t grasp why it is near impossible to restrict access to a clever kid then don’t preach about what you don’t understand and can’t change. Rather than idiotically demanding the impossible, why don’t you (or your researchers) learn the truth and present it in a non-sensationalist manner? The acronym PC means Personal Computer. This is amazingly accurate; as soon as you get a PC you can do whatever the feck you want to it. It is infinitely alterable in hardware and software so no measures by PCfkingWorld is going to stop you doing whatever the hell you want. Here is another truism; kids are determined and probably cleverer than you, so they will easily bypass your weak, ill-informed and pathetic attempts to block them.
And the moronic, melodramatic, ‘shocking’ revelation that there is kiddy porn freely and quickly available on the net was obviously put in to tug at the Maddie softened, JAIDS infected bleeding hearts of this idiotic country. After an extensive flogging-on career I have never stumbled upon this sort of material, even in some pretty dark recesses of the internet. I am under no illusion it is there, as I said above there is porn of everything, but maybe I have not seen it because I don’t go looking for it. She should be asked a few questions by the authorities because you need to have a focused delve into some pretty bad places to get to that kind of wrong on screen.
As you can tell I am a little angry at this hypocritical, sensationalist, simplistic, diluted, confusing and pointless attack on a natural part of human sexuality and technology. I thought it may be informative and funny, but alas – I was wrong. I think the next instalment is on later today. My bladder is already simmering away nicely so lets see if I can get a whistling cock by tonight.
Oh, and should I send a version of this rant to the producers of Channel 4?
10/10 ks. Where do I start? How about; Body Image. What the hell were those wonky swamp donkeys for? To say that everyone is an ugly, lumpy, hairy, droopy rotter when nekkid? OK, most girls are not the inflate-a-date, orange, enhanced, blond slag star of some porn – and good on em; personally I hate that look - but they made out that ALL porn portrays women like this. Wrong; only porn that caters for the fapper that likes inflate-a-date, orange, enhanced, blond slag porn stars have these types of 'women' in it. If internet porn teaches us anything it is that the human race and our sexual perversions are so massively diverse and horrifically wide ranging that there really is porn of everything, not just your gravity defying, Y shaped, coked up w
e bint. I know why they used those foul trogs in the show; how many women do you know that are happy to stand up in front of a few hundred giggling, sniggering brats? It seems only desperate, mothering, thatch heavy, lop sided, wobbly, hippy types are.Porn. People will go and look for what they like, no matter how depraved or wrong it seems to you; you can't dictate what a person finds attractive. There is a very good evolutionary reason why most lads like athletic bodies, symmetrical, pert and large tits and youthful vaginas that don't look like a dropped pie or a guerrilla autopsy. It is normal to find this appealing because it is built into our genes. The examples used in the show were terribly biased. 9 pictures of mangled spaniel’s ears and one picture of a pair of ridiculous inflatable jumper lumps? Of course everyone will gravitate toward the enhanced pair. Why did they not have a true reflection of tits through the whole spectrum of size, shape and symmetry rather than the two extremes? That is teaching the wrong message, warping the world view the wrong way, and I find it simply irresponsible.
And to harp on about shaving down there? What the f
k? Why not get at men for shaving their faces? We do it because most girls like it smooth and it make us look younger. Or why not get at girls shaving their armpits? Or why not just attack general personal hygiene? I bet that presenter bint, with more makeup than face, has a plucked clunge, so I found it a bit hypocritical her quizzing the yoof about the style of their pubic region. Let people do whatever the feck they want. Shaving is shaving, be it on your face or your biff – what the hell is the problem and why bring it up? She should have asked the little idiots about some of those haircuts! Astonishing st.Kids and Porn. They will see it, it is not accidental and they do not innocently stumble upon it. They ACTIVELY look for it; you looked for it when you were their age so why should they be any different? Regardless of where it comes from, as soon as those grubby little urges sprout forth they will go a looking. In my day it was some grotty old grumble mags found in the woods, or stolen from under the mattress of mate’s older brother, and traded on the playground. Today it is on the internet, mobile pones and on the telly. It is far easier to get hold of; but isn’t everything nowadays – it’s called civilisation, progress, enlightenment and technology. In a liberal, advanced society it is inevitable, and welcome. I say let em learn. Curiosity and learning is what being a kid is all about. Parents are always naive as to the true goings on in their kid’s bedroom / playground / pants / mind. They are dirty little f
kers just like you and me and they will look at porn, smoke, drink, take drugs and fk. Why? They are human, dumb, and curious like the rest of us. “Not my little Mackenzie / Destiny!” I hear you scream. Yes, I am afraid so.And then the true message of the show; some misguided, poorly informed and impossible to implement campaign against porn on the internet. The internet makes a mockery out of the UK censorship laws; it has broken down barriers and is totally free to all to contribute, including the wronguns of this world. Ignorance of its scope and the technology involved is not an excuse; if she and parents can’t grasp why it is near impossible to restrict access to a clever kid then don’t preach about what you don’t understand and can’t change. Rather than idiotically demanding the impossible, why don’t you (or your researchers) learn the truth and present it in a non-sensationalist manner? The acronym PC means Personal Computer. This is amazingly accurate; as soon as you get a PC you can do whatever the feck you want to it. It is infinitely alterable in hardware and software so no measures by PCf
kingWorld is going to stop you doing whatever the hell you want. Here is another truism; kids are determined and probably cleverer than you, so they will easily bypass your weak, ill-informed and pathetic attempts to block them.And the moronic, melodramatic, ‘shocking’ revelation that there is kiddy porn freely and quickly available on the net was obviously put in to tug at the Maddie softened, JAIDS infected bleeding hearts of this idiotic country. After an extensive flogging-on career I have never stumbled upon this sort of material, even in some pretty dark recesses of the internet. I am under no illusion it is there, as I said above there is porn of everything, but maybe I have not seen it because I don’t go looking for it. She should be asked a few questions by the authorities because you need to have a focused delve into some pretty bad places to get to that kind of wrong on screen.
As you can tell I am a little angry at this hypocritical, sensationalist, simplistic, diluted, confusing and pointless attack on a natural part of human sexuality and technology. I thought it may be informative and funny, but alas – I was wrong. I think the next instalment is on later today. My bladder is already simmering away nicely so lets see if I can get a whistling cock by tonight.
Oh, and should I send a version of this rant to the producers of Channel 4?
quality phrases, good diction and show of anger.
And makes total sense too. Have one of these as well
for "They are dirty little fkers just like you and me"You do know I look like a fool for laughing out loud dont you?
Good work
Edited by AstonV12 on Tuesday 31st March 14:53
spandexx said:
What a load of sensationalist, unrealistic and confusing (for the poor mites) bks. Where do I start?
How about; Body Image. What the hell were those wonky swamp donkeys for? To say that everyone is an ugly, lumpy, hairy, droopy rotter when nekkid? OK, most girls are not the inflate-a-date, orange, enhanced, blond slag star of some porn – and good on em; personally I hate that look - but they made out that ALL porn portrays women like this. Wrong; only porn that caters for the fapper that likes inflate-a-date, orange, enhanced, blond slag porn stars have these types of 'women' in it. If internet porn teaches us anything it is that the human race and our sexual perversions are so massively diverse and horrifically wide ranging that there really is porn of everything, not just your gravity defying, Y shaped, coked up we bint. I know why they used those foul trogs in the show; how many women do you know that are happy to stand up in front of a few hundred giggling, sniggering brats? It seems only desperate, mothering, thatch heavy, lop sided, wobbly, hippy types are.
Porn. People will go and look for what they like, no matter how depraved or wrong it seems to you; you can't dictate what a person finds attractive. There is a very good evolutionary reason why most lads like athletic bodies, symmetrical, pert and large tits and youthful vaginas that don't look like a dropped pie or a guerrilla autopsy. It is normal to find this appealing because it is built into our genes. The examples used in the show were terribly biased. 9 pictures of mangled spaniel’s ears and one picture of a pair of ridiculous inflatable jumper lumps? Of course everyone will gravitate toward the enhanced pair. Why did they not have a true reflection of tits through the whole spectrum of size, shape and symmetry rather than the two extremes? That is teaching the wrong message, warping the world view the wrong way, and I find it simply irresponsible.
And to harp on about shaving down there? What the fk? Why not get at men for shaving their faces? We do it because most girls like it smooth and it make us look younger. Or why not get at girls shaving their armpits? Or why not just attack general personal hygiene? I bet that presenter bint, with more makeup than face, has a plucked clunge, so I found it a bit hypocritical her quizzing the yoof about the style of their pubic region. Let people do whatever the feck they want. Shaving is shaving, be it on your face or your biff – what the hell is the problem and why bring it up? She should have asked the little idiots about some of those haircuts! Astonishing st.
Kids and Porn. They will see it, it is not accidental and they do not innocently stumble upon it. They ACTIVELY look for it; you looked for it when you were their age so why should they be any different? Regardless of where it comes from, as soon as those grubby little urges sprout forth they will go a looking. In my day it was some grotty old grumble mags found in the woods, or stolen from under the mattress of mate’s older brother, and traded on the playground. Today it is on the internet, mobile pones and on the telly. It is far easier to get hold of; but isn’t everything nowadays – it’s called civilisation, progress, enlightenment and technology. In a liberal, advanced society it is inevitable, and welcome. I say let em learn. Curiosity and learning is what being a kid is all about. Parents are always naive as to the true goings on in their kid’s bedroom / playground / pants / mind. They are dirty little fkers just like you and me and they will look at porn, smoke, drink, take drugs and fk. Why? They are human, dumb, and curious like the rest of us. “Not my little Mackenzie / Destiny!” I hear you scream. Yes, I am afraid so.
And then the true message of the show; some misguided, poorly informed and impossible to implement campaign against porn on the internet. The internet makes a mockery out of the UK censorship laws; it has broken down barriers and is totally free to all to contribute, including the wronguns of this world. Ignorance of its scope and the technology involved is not an excuse; if she and parents can’t grasp why it is near impossible to restrict access to a clever kid then don’t preach about what you don’t understand and can’t change. Rather than idiotically demanding the impossible, why don’t you (or your researchers) learn the truth and present it in a non-sensationalist manner? The acronym PC means Personal Computer. This is amazingly accurate; as soon as you get a PC you can do whatever the feck you want to it. It is infinitely alterable in hardware and software so no measures by PCfkingWorld is going to stop you doing whatever the hell you want. Here is another truism; kids are determined and probably cleverer than you, so they will easily bypass your weak, ill-informed and pathetic attempts to block them.
And the moronic, melodramatic, ‘shocking’ revelation that there is kiddy porn freely and quickly available on the net was obviously put in to tug at the Maddie softened, JAIDS infected bleeding hearts of this idiotic country. After an extensive flogging-on career I have never stumbled upon this sort of material, even in some pretty dark recesses of the internet. I am under no illusion it is there, as I said above there is porn of everything, but maybe I have not seen it because I don’t go looking for it. She should be asked a few questions by the authorities because you need to have a focused delve into some pretty bad places to get to that kind of wrong on screen.
As you can tell I am a little angry at this hypocritical, sensationalist, simplistic, diluted, confusing and pointless attack on a natural part of human sexuality and technology. I thought it may be informative and funny, but alas – I was wrong. I think the next instalment is on later today. My bladder is already simmering away nicely so lets see if I can get a whistling cock by tonight.
Oh, and should I send a version of this rant to the producers of Channel 4?
Yes.ks. Where do I start? How about; Body Image. What the hell were those wonky swamp donkeys for? To say that everyone is an ugly, lumpy, hairy, droopy rotter when nekkid? OK, most girls are not the inflate-a-date, orange, enhanced, blond slag star of some porn – and good on em; personally I hate that look - but they made out that ALL porn portrays women like this. Wrong; only porn that caters for the fapper that likes inflate-a-date, orange, enhanced, blond slag porn stars have these types of 'women' in it. If internet porn teaches us anything it is that the human race and our sexual perversions are so massively diverse and horrifically wide ranging that there really is porn of everything, not just your gravity defying, Y shaped, coked up w
e bint. I know why they used those foul trogs in the show; how many women do you know that are happy to stand up in front of a few hundred giggling, sniggering brats? It seems only desperate, mothering, thatch heavy, lop sided, wobbly, hippy types are.Porn. People will go and look for what they like, no matter how depraved or wrong it seems to you; you can't dictate what a person finds attractive. There is a very good evolutionary reason why most lads like athletic bodies, symmetrical, pert and large tits and youthful vaginas that don't look like a dropped pie or a guerrilla autopsy. It is normal to find this appealing because it is built into our genes. The examples used in the show were terribly biased. 9 pictures of mangled spaniel’s ears and one picture of a pair of ridiculous inflatable jumper lumps? Of course everyone will gravitate toward the enhanced pair. Why did they not have a true reflection of tits through the whole spectrum of size, shape and symmetry rather than the two extremes? That is teaching the wrong message, warping the world view the wrong way, and I find it simply irresponsible.
And to harp on about shaving down there? What the f
k? Why not get at men for shaving their faces? We do it because most girls like it smooth and it make us look younger. Or why not get at girls shaving their armpits? Or why not just attack general personal hygiene? I bet that presenter bint, with more makeup than face, has a plucked clunge, so I found it a bit hypocritical her quizzing the yoof about the style of their pubic region. Let people do whatever the feck they want. Shaving is shaving, be it on your face or your biff – what the hell is the problem and why bring it up? She should have asked the little idiots about some of those haircuts! Astonishing st.Kids and Porn. They will see it, it is not accidental and they do not innocently stumble upon it. They ACTIVELY look for it; you looked for it when you were their age so why should they be any different? Regardless of where it comes from, as soon as those grubby little urges sprout forth they will go a looking. In my day it was some grotty old grumble mags found in the woods, or stolen from under the mattress of mate’s older brother, and traded on the playground. Today it is on the internet, mobile pones and on the telly. It is far easier to get hold of; but isn’t everything nowadays – it’s called civilisation, progress, enlightenment and technology. In a liberal, advanced society it is inevitable, and welcome. I say let em learn. Curiosity and learning is what being a kid is all about. Parents are always naive as to the true goings on in their kid’s bedroom / playground / pants / mind. They are dirty little f
kers just like you and me and they will look at porn, smoke, drink, take drugs and fk. Why? They are human, dumb, and curious like the rest of us. “Not my little Mackenzie / Destiny!” I hear you scream. Yes, I am afraid so.And then the true message of the show; some misguided, poorly informed and impossible to implement campaign against porn on the internet. The internet makes a mockery out of the UK censorship laws; it has broken down barriers and is totally free to all to contribute, including the wronguns of this world. Ignorance of its scope and the technology involved is not an excuse; if she and parents can’t grasp why it is near impossible to restrict access to a clever kid then don’t preach about what you don’t understand and can’t change. Rather than idiotically demanding the impossible, why don’t you (or your researchers) learn the truth and present it in a non-sensationalist manner? The acronym PC means Personal Computer. This is amazingly accurate; as soon as you get a PC you can do whatever the feck you want to it. It is infinitely alterable in hardware and software so no measures by PCf
kingWorld is going to stop you doing whatever the hell you want. Here is another truism; kids are determined and probably cleverer than you, so they will easily bypass your weak, ill-informed and pathetic attempts to block them.And the moronic, melodramatic, ‘shocking’ revelation that there is kiddy porn freely and quickly available on the net was obviously put in to tug at the Maddie softened, JAIDS infected bleeding hearts of this idiotic country. After an extensive flogging-on career I have never stumbled upon this sort of material, even in some pretty dark recesses of the internet. I am under no illusion it is there, as I said above there is porn of everything, but maybe I have not seen it because I don’t go looking for it. She should be asked a few questions by the authorities because you need to have a focused delve into some pretty bad places to get to that kind of wrong on screen.
As you can tell I am a little angry at this hypocritical, sensationalist, simplistic, diluted, confusing and pointless attack on a natural part of human sexuality and technology. I thought it may be informative and funny, but alas – I was wrong. I think the next instalment is on later today. My bladder is already simmering away nicely so lets see if I can get a whistling cock by tonight.
Oh, and should I send a version of this rant to the producers of Channel 4?
Yup, good rant, 10/10, despite lacking many numbers or personal insults.
I remember some time ago watching a hill climb in Austria, that used to take place every year, at a place called "Rachau".
I thought it would be a laugh to go, so entered "Rachau" in Google. Imagine my surprise at what popped up. Nearly two pages of DONKEYS! before a single mention of the village of Rachau!
So, since then, I'm not surprised at anything that comes up on searches.
I remember some time ago watching a hill climb in Austria, that used to take place every year, at a place called "Rachau".
I thought it would be a laugh to go, so entered "Rachau" in Google. Imagine my surprise at what popped up. Nearly two pages of DONKEYS! before a single mention of the village of Rachau!
So, since then, I'm not surprised at anything that comes up on searches.
I have been thinking about the women from last night(not like that...) and, to be fair, they probably do represent what most woman really look like. Stay with me on this...
The programme was right to try and show that our views are distorted, I suspect a lot of the posters on this thread are 20somethings - I have news for you chappies, make the best of the 20something lasses you currently have your hands on as it doesn't get better with the passage of time. Most of those women on there had done their bit by having kids or just living life, we all get a bit porky as we get older, all sag a bit and generally don't look like we did when we were 18-20. What does happen is those older people get more confident and know what they like, that is a whole different kettle of fish!
As for what most people look like, just have a look on your nearest beach over Easter!!
As you all were.
The programme was right to try and show that our views are distorted, I suspect a lot of the posters on this thread are 20somethings - I have news for you chappies, make the best of the 20something lasses you currently have your hands on as it doesn't get better with the passage of time. Most of those women on there had done their bit by having kids or just living life, we all get a bit porky as we get older, all sag a bit and generally don't look like we did when we were 18-20. What does happen is those older people get more confident and know what they like, that is a whole different kettle of fish!
As for what most people look like, just have a look on your nearest beach over Easter!!
As you all were.
Just watched the clips on the website - so she shows a bunch of lads some photographs of knobs, and asks them (in front of each other) to identify what size is normal. And they pick the ones somewhere in the middle of the range presented, instead of the correct (smallest) one. And this, the thesis goes, is because they've been looking at too much porn. Alternative thesis - they had absolutely no idea what was really normal, but didn't want to give the impression that they had a small one by choosing from the small end of the range.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff