Your single most annoying thing/mistake in a movie!

Your single most annoying thing/mistake in a movie!

Author
Discussion

Halmyre

11,301 posts

141 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
ajprice said:
poing said:
Johnnytheboy said:
Morningside said:
computers...

Making bleeping noises when a key is pressed...
Does anyone here have the misfortune to be exposed to NCIS? My OH watches it as a daily religious duty.

Every single computer bleeps every time anyone touches it. Drives me to despair.

Along with everything else about that damn franchise
NCIS is the worst thing in the world for the computer tech.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8qgehH3kEQ&sp...
Computer tech stuff: This tumblr site posts screenshots of code on computer screens in movies or TV shows and tries to work out what the code is from https://moviecode.tumblr.com

It is often real code, something like C, Java or Python, or copied from a coding tutorial site. Sometimes its a really neat easter egg like the one for Ex Machina on page 6, but the next post after it is a silly one from CSI Cyber hehe
ISTR in 'Superman III' Richard Prior writes a computer program in BASIC that consists solely of REM statements.

p1stonhead

25,752 posts

169 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
Having a store CCTV camera ROTATE around people in Enemy of the State. Literally impossible unless the camera was on a moving track which happened to be running in a ring around their heads!

Good film though hehe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EwZQddc3kY

p1stonhead

25,752 posts

169 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
languagetimothy said:
the hero will walk slowly away from the big explosion with their back to hit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sqz5dbs5zmo

hehe

944fan

4,962 posts

187 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Or that MI6 has the money to splurge on limited edition Aston Martins full of extra expensive gadgetry for it's agents.

They might get a company Ford Focus Style with satnav and that's about it.
I know what you are saying but is a film, make believe init. Who wants to see Bond getting out of a Vaxhaul insignia in his Next suit?

Makes me laugh when people pick on tiny premises in bond films, the whole story is based on a man who works for the UK government, who has a "license" to wander the earth and kill whomever he sees fit with no justification or accountability.

stephen300o

15,464 posts

230 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
Mothersruin said:
robemcdonald said:
Mothersruin said:
Anything military.
This surprises me a bit. Whilst Stallones exploits clearly bear no resemblance to actual combat, what about films like a bridge to far, black hawk down and more recently Fury. I went to Bovingdon last week and there was an exhibit explaining how they provided a lot of support to ensure accuracy. My feeling would be those guys know what they are talking about.
As above really, actors don't move and carry themselves like soldiers regardless of the accuracy of the props etc... It's not their fault, just the way it is.
Most noticeable in Star Wars, real storm troopers don't bang their head on doorways and let their arse armour jiggle about like the actors do.

boyse7en

6,793 posts

167 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
Also every time a protagonist is falling to his death, only to grab a ledge/convenient thing with his fingertips. Not. Going. To. Happen.
And leading on from this...
Once the hero is hanging by his fingertips onto a bridge/ledge he always manages to pull himself up onto level ground effortlessly. How?

stephen300o

15,464 posts

230 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
boyse7en said:
glazbagun said:
Also every time a protagonist is falling to his death, only to grab a ledge/convenient thing with his fingertips. Not. Going. To. Happen.
And leading on from this...
Once the hero is hanging by his fingertips onto a bridge/ledge he always manages to pull himself up onto level ground effortlessly. How?
Because they are the hero, barely linked to reality, representing what we would like to see happen in a given situation.
Reality is twisted in their favour to create moments of exhilarating victory, a precursor to the super-hero, where they wind reality back further. Reality and story are not great together to equate entertainment, so reality is enhanced.
But everyone knew that already.

dudleybloke

19,986 posts

188 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
boyse7en said:
glazbagun said:
Also every time a protagonist is falling to his death, only to grab a ledge/convenient thing with his fingertips. Not. Going. To. Happen.
And leading on from this...
Once the hero is hanging by his fingertips onto a bridge/ledge he always manages to pull himself up onto level ground effortlessly. How?
Or when the hero is hanging by the fingertips of one hand he can catch a falling person with his other hand.

Halmyre

11,301 posts

141 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
stephen300o said:
Mothersruin said:
robemcdonald said:
Mothersruin said:
Anything military.
This surprises me a bit. Whilst Stallones exploits clearly bear no resemblance to actual combat, what about films like a bridge to far, black hawk down and more recently Fury. I went to Bovingdon last week and there was an exhibit explaining how they provided a lot of support to ensure accuracy. My feeling would be those guys know what they are talking about.
As above really, actors don't move and carry themselves like soldiers regardless of the accuracy of the props etc... It's not their fault, just the way it is.
Most noticeable in Star Wars, real storm troopers don't bang their head on doorways and let their arse armour jiggle about like the actors do.
Heh.

Errors in the military, or more to the point, firearms, does seem to upset a lot of people. IMDB message boards are full of complaints about how "this actor has obviously never fired a gun in anger" or "this actor has obviously never served in uniform". No st, Sherlock, and the clue is 'actor'. Nobody gives Tom Hanks pelters for never having actually flown in a Saturn V or Daniel Day Lewis for never actually having drilled for oil.

philcray

846 posts

205 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
locking & unlocking any car makes a blipping sound, no car has done this since about 1985....

turning the lights on in a warehouse makes a kchunk noise as if a massive circuit breaker is clunking into place - no it doesn't, its just a light switch like the one in a house....

DMN

2,995 posts

141 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
rb5er said:
dudleybloke said:
The amazing self repairing car.
This annoys me in Commando.
The yellow 911, battered and rolled onto its side magically becomes brand new in the next scene.
Commando is a tour de force in mistakes. The visable spring boards to make the bad guys leap in the air when something explodes are brilliant.

Issi

1,782 posts

152 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
Halmyre said:
Heh.

Errors in the military, or more to the point, firearms, does seem to upset a lot of people. IMDB message boards are full of complaints about how "this actor has obviously never fired a gun in anger" or "this actor has obviously never served in uniform". No st, Sherlock, and the clue is 'actor'. Nobody gives Tom Hanks pelters for never having actually flown in a Saturn V or Daniel Day Lewis for never actually having drilled for oil.
But you can be reasonably sure that they consulted NASA and BP for some pointers on how such things would work.

What annoys the military folk is when for example, they are showing a chap in the infantry who is a Corporal, and they give him a Tank regiment beret and Sergeant stripes.

stephen300o

15,464 posts

230 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
Issi said:
Halmyre said:
Heh.

Errors in the military, or more to the point, firearms, does seem to upset a lot of people. IMDB message boards are full of complaints about how "this actor has obviously never fired a gun in anger" or "this actor has obviously never served in uniform". No st, Sherlock, and the clue is 'actor'. Nobody gives Tom Hanks pelters for never having actually flown in a Saturn V or Daniel Day Lewis for never actually having drilled for oil.
But you can be reasonably sure that they consulted NASA and BP for some pointers on how such things would work.

What annoys the military folk is when for example, they are showing a chap in the infantry who is a Corporal, and they give him a Tank regiment beret and Sergeant stripes.
To gain a reasonable amount of realism yes,
some demand an unreasonable amount of realism
for what is just vague representation to tell a story.

Issi

1,782 posts

152 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
But then again, there are people on here who would quite happily moan that the Mercedes that they used in Fast and Furious 9 couldn't be that one, as they only made 25 of the 500 SXE 9.8 quin litre Coupes and anyway they didn't come out until November the 21st 1985, and if you look at 1hr :39 mins you can clearly see leaves on the trees behind Rex Fister.


Shakermaker

11,317 posts

102 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
Issi said:
Halmyre said:
Heh.

Errors in the military, or more to the point, firearms, does seem to upset a lot of people. IMDB message boards are full of complaints about how "this actor has obviously never fired a gun in anger" or "this actor has obviously never served in uniform". No st, Sherlock, and the clue is 'actor'. Nobody gives Tom Hanks pelters for never having actually flown in a Saturn V or Daniel Day Lewis for never actually having drilled for oil.
But you can be reasonably sure that they consulted NASA and BP for some pointers on how such things would work.

What annoys the military folk is when for example, they are showing a chap in the infantry who is a Corporal, and they give him a Tank regiment beret and Sergeant stripes.
But the rest of us can go "Oh look, that guy must be in the Army and I know he must be junior because he just saluted that other dude before telling him to stick it" as is often the storyline.

EDIT

but I get your point.

The equivalent for me was in the Inbetweeners movie.

They get dropped off by Simon's dad at North Terminal.

They then are seen to get on the Gatwick terminal shuttle, which goes to the South Terminal (where you can get dropped off anyway) but then the next scene, they are filmed at a check in desk which is still in the North terminal.

And, at the end of the film when they arrive back (and this is the same in Inbetweeners 2) they arrive back through the Domestic arrivals route, which since they had come back from Greece and/or Australia, wouldn't be the case at all.



Edited by Shakermaker on Tuesday 14th June 16:12

Morningside

24,111 posts

231 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
Another thing I have noticed is that in the post apocalyptic wastelands that all lighting are of the incandescent type. Why not low energy LED or CFL?

Guvernator

13,195 posts

167 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
Pesty said:
Terminator lets freeze and shatter the t1000

Then watch it as it all melts again and joins together instead of scooping the bits up and throwing them in the furnace next to them.
I love that movie but this bit ALWAYS bugs me. Don't just fking stare at it like mongs. It takes at least 30 seconds for it to reform during which time it is TOTALLY vulnerable. Grab the nearest bucket and broom and just sweep it up and dump it in the furnace. Instead they choose the retard option of running away again like thats worked out well for them so far.

Edited by Guvernator on Tuesday 14th June 17:36

Mr Snrub

25,018 posts

229 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
Yes go to

http://hackertyper.com/

Mash random crap on the keyboard and amaze your friends with you hacker skills.

Don't forget to shout "we're in!" at some point.
Or if someone not particularly computer literate leaves it unlocked at work, go onto that site and press F11 for full screen. Sit back and enjoy the confusion.

robemcdonald

8,875 posts

198 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
Shakermaker said:
But the rest of us can go "Oh look, that guy must be in the Army and I know he must be junior because he just saluted that other dude before telling him to stick it" as is often the storyline.

EDIT

but I get your point.

The equivalent for me was in the Inbetweeners movie.

They get dropped off by Simon's dad at North Terminal.

They then are seen to get on the Gatwick terminal shuttle, which goes to the South Terminal (where you can get dropped off anyway) but then the next scene, they are filmed at a check in desk which is still in the North terminal.

And, at the end of the film when they arrive back (and this is the same in Inbetweeners 2) they arrive back through the Domestic arrivals route, which since they had come back from Greece and/or Australia, wouldn't be the case at all.



Edited by Shakermaker on Tuesday 14th June 16:12
On a similar note. In Harry Potter: The deathly hollows part 1. When they are escaping from the death eaters at the begining of the film. Harry flies north through the dart ford tunnel (the bridge is on the right) and the cars are coming towards him. Now I had considered that the bridge might be shut, but when he flies out of the other end you can see traffic in both bores is going south and there is traffic on the bridge.

kiethton

13,949 posts

182 months

Tuesday 14th June 2016
quotequote all
https://youtu.be/14H3lx0_vfw

Margot Robbie - no more panties.....she clearly still has them on when she gets up at the end :/