Traffic Cops Channel 5
Discussion
eldar said:
I record it. Skip the repeated bits and ads, 30 mins.
BBC stuff if I can't watch it live, I get it on catch up. All the commercial channels I record and jump through the ads. 3, 4 or 5 minutes at a time. Makes you wonder how many people are watching ads. What with putting the kettle on or going for a pee.Vipers said:
What irritates me is after the ads, they recap on what you have just seen, WHY??????
Get on with the programme FFS.
In our house we call Traffic Cops and Interceptors "Coming up" and "Still to come" respectively. Traffic Cops used to be on BBC1 when it first started and it managed to fill an hour then so I don't think it's wholly filler. My theory is it reveals Ch5's opinion of the attention span of its audience. The pre-advert "coming up" bit being an attempt to prevent channel hopping when the ads come on and the recaps after the ads being for the benefit of newly arrived channel hoppers. Get on with the programme FFS.
Whatever the reason it is extremely annoying.
siremoon said:
In our house we call Traffic Cops and Interceptors "Coming up" and "Still to come" respectively. Traffic Cops used to be on BBC1 when it first started and it managed to fill an hour then so I don't think it's wholly filler. My theory is it reveals Ch5's opinion of the attention span of its audience. The pre-advert "coming up" bit being an attempt to prevent channel hopping when the ads come on and the recaps after the ads being for the benefit of newly arrived channel hoppers.
Whatever the reason it is extremely annoying.
"In our house we call Traffic Cops and Interceptors "Coming up" and "Still to come" respectively."Whatever the reason it is extremely annoying.
Or "previously".
SistersofPercy said:
droopsnoot said:
Another parade of "no further action" last night.
How the hell do you have a bloke walking out of the Co-Op with that much meat on CCTV and not be able to prosecute? SistersofPercy said:
How the hell do you have a bloke walking out of the Co-Op with that much meat on CCTV and not be able to prosecute?
The driver got off very lightly as well, he knew exactly what was going onNot sure i would have wanted to eat any of meat after it had been returned to the shop...
SydneyBridge said:
The driver got off very lightly as well, he knew exactly what was going on
Not sure i would have wanted to eat any of meat after it had been returned to the shop...
The shop would have had to bin it - once it's left the store and they have no idea what temperatures it's been subjected to it becomes a risk and in the bin it goes. Not sure i would have wanted to eat any of meat after it had been returned to the shop...
As said above I'm amazed the two from the Focus just got away with that, it sends a really bad message.
SydneyBridge said:
SistersofPercy said:
How the hell do you have a bloke walking out of the Co-Op with that much meat on CCTV and not be able to prosecute?
The driver got off very lightly as well, he knew exactly what was going onNot sure i would have wanted to eat any of meat after it had been returned to the shop...
But it begs the question of why not prosecute, but then again reading today some of the egits who painted something else with orange paint may not get to court for TWO years due to the backlog.
SistersofPercy said:
droopsnoot said:
Another parade of "no further action" last night.
How the hell do you have a bloke walking out of the Co-Op with that much meat on CCTV and not be able to prosecute? GetCarter said:
SistersofPercy said:
droopsnoot said:
Another parade of "no further action" last night.
How the hell do you have a bloke walking out of the Co-Op with that much meat on CCTV and not be able to prosecute? eldar said:
GetCarter said:
SistersofPercy said:
droopsnoot said:
Another parade of "no further action" last night.
How the hell do you have a bloke walking out of the Co-Op with that much meat on CCTV and not be able to prosecute? (along with the 40 new hospitals!)
GetCarter said:
The criminal justice system is so overloaded, understaffed and underfunded these days that most crimes get waved aside, only complete certainties are given the go ahead by the CPS. It's a bloody disgrace (and yes it's the Tories that have done us, yet again).
Easy to blame the tories for everything but they don't make day to day management decisions inside the CPS. As for "complete certainties", a recent case I was involved in was pursued relentlessly by the CPS way beyond what was appropriate and they were heavily criticised by a senior judge for wasting public money, their own time and the court's time in doing so. My view is they get bees in their collective bonnets or tunnel vision about certain cases irrespective of the chances of success and deploy disproportionate resources to those cases and thus don't pursue other cases with a better evidential basis such as some of those seen in these RPU fly-on-the-wall programmes. That's down to management not politicians.
SydneyBridge said:
SistersofPercy said:
How the hell do you have a bloke walking out of the Co-Op with that much meat on CCTV and not be able to prosecute?
The driver got off very lightly as well, he knew exactly what was going onNot sure i would have wanted to eat any of meat after it had been returned to the shop...
I bet the shop manager and owners couldn’t care less about the driving charge, but want so deterrent for the stealing.
It strikes me you can now do what you like in this country, but don’t even think about doing it in a car!
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff