Star Wars 7

Author
Discussion

HorneyMX5

5,311 posts

151 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
richtea78 said:
According to IMDB he was
Fair enough, I also rememberd that JJ has talked about minimal CGI to get back tothe feel of the original trilogy so that would tie up with lots more puppetry and small people in costumes.

Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
HorneyMX5 said:
Fair enough, I also rememberd that JJ has talked about minimal CGI to get back tothe feel of the original trilogy so that would tie up with lots more puppetry and small people in costumes.
Thanks fk.
Green screen helped to smother all reality and emotion in the st ones. It would have required serious acting chops to combat that. And apart from Emperor and Neeson, it wasn't there.

JonRB

74,835 posts

273 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
Halb said:
And apart from Emperor and Neeson, it wasn't there.
Liam Neeson has certain skills, you see. A very particular set of skills, in fact. smile

Mutley

3,178 posts

260 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
HorneyMX5 said:
Was Baker even involved in the prequels? I thought they were all CGI or remote control R2D2s in that.
I believe Baker also played an uncredited character in Phantom, in the build up to the pod race

FourWheelDrift

88,670 posts

285 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
That was Warwick Davies, unless he was also there.



He's the one sitting in front of a PC posting rubbish on Pistonheads.

Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
That was Warwick Davies, unless he was also there.



He's the one sitting in front of a PC posting rubbish on Pistonheads.
Ahh, he gave 8/10 in the Prometheus thread you say. biggrin

Mutley

3,178 posts

260 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
/hangs head in shame

Thanks!

central

16,744 posts

218 months

Halmyre

11,261 posts

140 months

Tuesday 18th March 2014
quotequote all
central said:
It's going to be st/great. (delete as per preference)


Mutley

3,178 posts

260 months

Wednesday 19th March 2014
quotequote all
Halmyre said:
It's going to be st/great. (delete as per preference)
How about Great st ?

Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Wednesday 19th March 2014
quotequote all
I won't hold out any hope, but I will secretly wish it is decent.

P-Jay

Original Poster:

10,599 posts

192 months

Wednesday 19th March 2014
quotequote all
Halb said:
I won't hold out any hope, but I will secretly wish it is decent.
I personally think these will be a lot better than the prequals, but however good they are, sadly nothing is going to make me a kid again, so they'll never be as good as the originals for me.

FourWheelDrift

88,670 posts

285 months

Wednesday 19th March 2014
quotequote all
Star Wars VII - George Lucas > Prequels

JonRB

74,835 posts

273 months

Wednesday 19th March 2014
quotequote all
I think that, whatever Disney do with the franchise, it'll be better written and better directed than the prequels. I can't see JJ Abrams doing lots of lazy two camera act-react shots of boring stilted dialog about trade embargos.

However, I do expect lots of lens flare, running around, and volume turned up to 11 action at the expense of a decent story.

Maybe it'll work and maybe it won't. I honestly think that Disney is incapable of making it any worse than the prequels though. However, it might not be Star Wars as we know it.

richtea78

5,574 posts

159 months

Wednesday 19th March 2014
quotequote all
JonRB said:
I think that, whatever Disney do with the franchise, it'll be better written and better directed than the prequels. I can't see JJ Abrams doing lots of lazy two camera act-react shots of boring stilted dialog about trade embargos.

However, I do expect lots of lens flare, running around, and volume turned up to 11 action at the expense of a decent story.

Maybe it'll work and maybe it won't. I honestly think that Disney is incapable of making it any worse than the prequels though. However, it might not be Star Wars as we know it.
That is pretty much spot on how I feel about it. I enjoyed the Star Trek movies that Abrahms did but I am not a Star Trek fan. I think the Star Wars films will be good films, Im not sure they will feel like Star Wars though. To be honest though I am not sure that anything can. I grew up watching Star Wars, how can you recapture that as an adult?

ZesPak

24,439 posts

197 months

Wednesday 19th March 2014
quotequote all
richtea78 said:
That is pretty much spot on how I feel about it. I enjoyed the Star Trek movies that Abrahms did but I am not a Star Trek fan. I think the Star Wars films will be good films, Im not sure they will feel like Star Wars though. To be honest though I am not sure that anything can. I grew up watching Star Wars, how can you recapture that as an adult?
yes

Big Star Trek fan here, and basically imho the Abrahams movies were a big FU to Trek fans. But, if you look at them separate from the "source material", they're okay SF movies for this day and age.

JonRB

74,835 posts

273 months

Wednesday 19th March 2014
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
Big Star Trek fan here, and basically imho the Abrahams movies were a big FU to Trek fans. But, if you look at them separate from the "source material", they're okay SF movies for this day and age.
In fairness, Star Trek was groaning under the weight of its own canon and didn't really have many more places to go. Rebooting the whole franchise with a parallel universe / alternate reality was quite clever, I thought. It gave them a chance to start over, but with the option for things to develop the same way if they wished.

I think the new films will do similar, inasmuch as they are going to make the Expanded Universe non-canon. They'd better not mess with it too badly though - I expect Han and Leia to be married. Anything else would be just wrong. smile


elvismiggell

1,636 posts

152 months

Wednesday 19th March 2014
quotequote all
JonRB said:
I expect Han and Leia to be married. Anything else would be just wrong. smile
Indeed, and frankly I'll be disappointed if their kids aren't Jacen, Jaina and Anakin!

Plus, and I know there's nothing in the films for it, but Mara Jade and Ben have to feature for Luke!

Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Wednesday 19th March 2014
quotequote all
I read the early SWU books, the Thrawn trilogy, which was pushed as 'what happened next' thing, but then they went mental, and I stopped reading when the quality of the books plummeted...and with the cartoons and the comics as well...
They took a great idea and again...rubbished it.
Now there is all this 'stuff' out there...I don't know much about it save for a few afternoons lost on wiki, but for them to rubbish it too much would again separate any involvement fans might have with being involved with a story. Not just for SW, but for any large franchise. Either respect the fans or frack orf.

JonRB

74,835 posts

273 months

Wednesday 19th March 2014
quotequote all
Halb said:
I read the early SWU books, the Thrawn trilogy, which was pushed as 'what happened next' thing, but then they went mental, and I stopped reading when the quality of the books plummeted...and with the cartoons and the comics as well...
They took a great idea and again...rubbished it.
Now there is all this 'stuff' out there...I don't know much about it save for a few afternoons lost on wiki, but for them to rubbish it too much would again separate any involvement fans might have with being involved with a story. Not just for SW, but for any large franchise. Either respect the fans or frack orf.
The thing about the Expanded Universe, is that in order to get permission from LucusFilm / LucusArts to publish it, it had to adhere to the existing works. This made it remarkably cohesive. It even applied to the video ghames too (eg. Dark Forces). However, I totally agree with you that the quality of the books tailed off and I lost interest round about the time they did the books on Han Solo's back story and paired him up with a sidekick almost identical to Chewbacca but not a Wookiee. I found that rather sloppy, tbh.

The Thrawn books were bloody brilliant though.

As for the comics (or 'graphic novels'), I read "Dark Empire" where Luke temporarily turns to the Dark Side, and it was very good indeed. I never got round to reading any more of these though - it's the only one I have.



Edited by JonRB on Wednesday 19th March 16:47