Bad Films I watched this weekend
Discussion
Pacific Rim.
Nice aesthetic (good to see someone else who hasn't assumed that the future has to be monochromatic and constantly raining) but apart from that oh dear.
Lots of men being men, ooh so brave, so macho, so predictable.
I particularly liked the EMP that knocked everything out but it's ok because we can use Burberry Mk2 which is like totally, you know, analog as it's nooclear.
Even Ron Perlman in gold shoes couldn't save it (although it was a valiant attempt).
Then for a film all about big, huge, ginormous thing(s) hitting one another the epic end battle took place in an environment with no references to human scale and could have just been robots 1 foot high fighting bugs.
Nice aesthetic (good to see someone else who hasn't assumed that the future has to be monochromatic and constantly raining) but apart from that oh dear.
Lots of men being men, ooh so brave, so macho, so predictable.
I particularly liked the EMP that knocked everything out but it's ok because we can use Burberry Mk2 which is like totally, you know, analog as it's nooclear.
Even Ron Perlman in gold shoes couldn't save it (although it was a valiant attempt).
Then for a film all about big, huge, ginormous thing(s) hitting one another the epic end battle took place in an environment with no references to human scale and could have just been robots 1 foot high fighting bugs.
Johnnytheboy said:
Halmyre said:
ESOG said:
Johnnytheboy said:
I know I'm a few years late, but I just sat through Black Swan.
OMFG that is without doubt one of the worse films I've ever seen.
I don't even know where to begin...
You must be on some sort of point in your life when you cannot appreciate fine theatrics such as the Black Swan. May I ask how old you are..OMFG that is without doubt one of the worse films I've ever seen.
I don't even know where to begin...
My mum and her pals (all in their twilight years!) went to see it because they thought a film about ballet dancers would be perfect entertainment...
My fundamental problems with it were:
(a) the pacing, which was far too rapid for the subject matter. It was like watching a 90 minute music video, or a normal film on slight fast forward.
(b) my own perceived lack of any sympathy for the lead character. She didn't start by being a particularly likeable person and consequently I found it very hard to care what happened to her within about ten minutes.
(c) the film busted its hallucination flush too early. So again, I no longer really took much notice of anything that happened to her because I didn't know (or care) whether it mattered.
(d) the French choreographer was such a cliché he may as well of been made of a single piece of cardboard.
My OH and I give films a rating out of ten after we watch them. We usually argue at least a bit and end up agreeing on a fairly inoffensive rating to keep the peace.
This time we both just said "zero".
I agree re vincent cassells' portrayal of the master was hackneyed and cliched - if the point was that he was contributing to her losing her mind then it would surely have been more subtle?
however "likeable" or not Portmans' character was the fact that she trained as a ballerina for a year in order to film it as a dancer was superb and as female lead performances go over the last few years it was a standout one for me.
I thought the film was a 6.5-7/10 all in.
however "likeable" or not Portmans' character was the fact that she trained as a ballerina for a year in order to film it as a dancer was superb and as female lead performances go over the last few years it was a standout one for me.
I thought the film was a 6.5-7/10 all in.
Project X.
Risible. Lazy. Self Indulgent. Unfunny.
wanted to be a combination of (pick your cliche) Porkys, American Pie, Animal House, throw in a bit of Ferris / wierd science etc.
how this has got 6.7 on IMDB is beyond me. This watched like a live rave from the 1990's without the decent soundtrack.
utter utter utter ste. avoid.
Risible. Lazy. Self Indulgent. Unfunny.
wanted to be a combination of (pick your cliche) Porkys, American Pie, Animal House, throw in a bit of Ferris / wierd science etc.
how this has got 6.7 on IMDB is beyond me. This watched like a live rave from the 1990's without the decent soundtrack.
utter utter utter ste. avoid.
Nom de ploom said:
Project X.
Risible. Lazy. Self Indulgent. Unfunny.
wanted to be a combination of (pick your cliche) Porkys, American Pie, Animal House, throw in a bit of Ferris / wierd science etc.
how this has got 6.7 on IMDB is beyond me. This watched like a live rave from the 1990's without the decent soundtrack.
utter utter utter ste. avoid.
It was like a teenage boys fantasy. I thought it was ste too.Risible. Lazy. Self Indulgent. Unfunny.
wanted to be a combination of (pick your cliche) Porkys, American Pie, Animal House, throw in a bit of Ferris / wierd science etc.
how this has got 6.7 on IMDB is beyond me. This watched like a live rave from the 1990's without the decent soundtrack.
utter utter utter ste. avoid.
Daniel1 said:
Nom de ploom said:
Project X.
Risible. Lazy. Self Indulgent. Unfunny.
wanted to be a combination of (pick your cliche) Porkys, American Pie, Animal House, throw in a bit of Ferris / wierd science etc.
how this has got 6.7 on IMDB is beyond me. This watched like a live rave from the 1990's without the decent soundtrack.
utter utter utter ste. avoid.
It was like a teenage boys fantasy. I thought it was ste too.Risible. Lazy. Self Indulgent. Unfunny.
wanted to be a combination of (pick your cliche) Porkys, American Pie, Animal House, throw in a bit of Ferris / wierd science etc.
how this has got 6.7 on IMDB is beyond me. This watched like a live rave from the 1990's without the decent soundtrack.
utter utter utter ste. avoid.
Robocop - I knew it would never live up to the original, which is one of my favourite films of all time, but I never thought it would be so anodyne and dull. There's very little character buildup, and Murphy is so bland you never relate to him or what he goes through. The fight scenes are all over far too quickly and have that 12A feel all over them and Robocop himself is far too quick and agile, losing much of the imposing awe he previously had. It also doesn't properly answer the question of why you'd even need him when they already have massive armies of perfectly capable robots.
One of the great things about the original was that OCP wasn't just Generic Evil Inc - morally questionable but didn't have any sinister motives, but all of that is quickly forgotten here in an attempt to have some sort of villain, since the ones who try and kill Murphy originally are so forgettable I couldn't tell you their names. His bike was cool though.
One of the great things about the original was that OCP wasn't just Generic Evil Inc - morally questionable but didn't have any sinister motives, but all of that is quickly forgotten here in an attempt to have some sort of villain, since the ones who try and kill Murphy originally are so forgettable I couldn't tell you their names. His bike was cool though.
Posted this in the Good films as a response to others reviews, so should be in here -
Godzilla
Saw it yesterday as the only acceptable option having got delayed on way to cinema so missed the start of X-Men & Spiderman 2.
I've not been this disappointed in a film since Prometheus.
For me the film was a full "America... fk yeah... were awesome... Lets make it all about us and not the giant monster called Godzilla"
I'd probably only give it a 4/10 for the special effects only.
And for the fact that you don't even see Godzilla until at least an hour into a film named after it is just stupid. Also in what world do you not check on a radiation feeding MUTO, stored in a radioactive storage facility. Or the fact that you then not notice a whole section of that facility is missing until you need to check its there!!!!
Can anyone explain what Godzilla shoots from its mouth too? because traditionally in the Jap/anime cartoons/movies he shoots radiation. which would have been inefective to the radiation eating MUTO's!
Godzilla
Saw it yesterday as the only acceptable option having got delayed on way to cinema so missed the start of X-Men & Spiderman 2.
I've not been this disappointed in a film since Prometheus.
For me the film was a full "America... fk yeah... were awesome... Lets make it all about us and not the giant monster called Godzilla"
I'd probably only give it a 4/10 for the special effects only.
And for the fact that you don't even see Godzilla until at least an hour into a film named after it is just stupid. Also in what world do you not check on a radiation feeding MUTO, stored in a radioactive storage facility. Or the fact that you then not notice a whole section of that facility is missing until you need to check its there!!!!
Can anyone explain what Godzilla shoots from its mouth too? because traditionally in the Jap/anime cartoons/movies he shoots radiation. which would have been inefective to the radiation eating MUTO's!
bristolracer said:
Gravity
What a pile of steaming S***e
What was all the Hype about?
Knew i should have watched Wallander (Swedish version) instead
I think you need to watch it on a cinema screen because it's about the visuals more than the story. I felt the same about Avatar, it is crap on TV but looked great on an IMAXWhat a pile of steaming S***e
What was all the Hype about?
Knew i should have watched Wallander (Swedish version) instead
P-Jay said:
I had suspected that given there was much less hype about this one than 'Shaun' and 'Fuzz' it might have some issues - but as above, it's not very funny, the story is silly, but not 'good silly' and the sort of twist at the end that was building up for 90 mins was pretty obvious from the start - mostly because it's shown, at the start.
The disc I had was slightly damaged so the last 5-10 mins didn't play properly - I don't feel cheated by that.
If that last 5-10 minutes includes the bit I think it does then you missed my personal (and pretty much only) highlight of the movie.The disc I had was slightly damaged so the last 5-10 mins didn't play properly - I don't feel cheated by that.
The drunken argument with the alien voice, underneath the worlds end pub. Pegg's very drunk Gary King character (referred to by the alien as Gary, King of the humans): "Why dont you just get back in your rocket and fk off then, you !! And it does too!
menousername said:
H22observer said:
Shutter Island.
It got 8.1/10 on IMDB, but i thought it was very poor and some scenes looked a bit low budget and cheap.
Last time i saw something this bad was Cloud Atlas.
Suprised by this... thought this was one of the best films I have seen It got 8.1/10 on IMDB, but i thought it was very poor and some scenes looked a bit low budget and cheap.
Last time i saw something this bad was Cloud Atlas.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff