Paedo beaten to a pulp
Discussion
Thankyou4calling said:
Surely he will face a pretty serious charge for this?
A horrible scenario but unless it was self defence you can't go around administering your own punishment even in America I wouldn't have thought?
Chief Chitwood "he was just acting like a dad". No charges. I like the yanks.A horrible scenario but unless it was self defence you can't go around administering your own punishment even in America I wouldn't have thought?
rollondeath said:
Chief Chitwood "he was just acting like a dad". No charges. I like the yanks.
Not sure myself. I'm a dad of a young girl & I can't say I wouldn't do the same & I can't bring myself to judge this guy, but we have the rule of law for a reason. It's a moral dilemma if you look at it with a cold objective eye, but I'm not crying for the kiddy fiddler.Thankyou4calling said:
rollondeath said:
Chief Chitwood "he was just acting like a dad". No charges. I like the yanks.
No need for a long established legal system then. Just dish it out yourself! Sounds like a recipe for anarchy to me. dandarez said:
Imagine that scenario in here in the UK.
Similar outcome and no charge for father, or father incarcerated before he could say Jack Robinson?
We are allowed to use reasonable force in our own homes here to defend a family member from an assault. Ignore those ridiculous Daily Mail comments about letting the paedo go and arresting the father.Similar outcome and no charge for father, or father incarcerated before he could say Jack Robinson?
Interesting comments (link)
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/raymond-frolander-accu...
My take on it is he (father) was protecting his child from further harm. Like crime of passion. He could have killed the scum, he didn't. It was inside the child's home and father's property.
What would you do?
'Oh, carry on raping my child while I call the cops. Do you like your coffee white, with sugar?'
Here he would no doubt have been dragged off if he'd just restrained the scum, with the scum arguing he was the one that was assaulted.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/raymond-frolander-accu...
My take on it is he (father) was protecting his child from further harm. Like crime of passion. He could have killed the scum, he didn't. It was inside the child's home and father's property.
What would you do?
'Oh, carry on raping my child while I call the cops. Do you like your coffee white, with sugar?'
Here he would no doubt have been dragged off if he'd just restrained the scum, with the scum arguing he was the one that was assaulted.
FourWheelDrift said:
dandarez said:
Imagine that scenario in here in the UK.
Similar outcome and no charge for father, or father incarcerated before he could say Jack Robinson?
We are allowed to use reasonable force in our own homes here to defend a family member from an assault. Ignore those ridiculous Daily Mail comments about letting the paedo go and arresting the father.Similar outcome and no charge for father, or father incarcerated before he could say Jack Robinson?
Vaughan Jones used reasonable force. What did he get for his trouble?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/vaughan-jones...
dandarez said:
What about ridiculous Mirror comments?
Vaughan Jones used reasonable force. What did he get for his trouble?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/vaughan-jones...
The police had no idea of what had happened and until they did they took both into custody. Once they knew they released him without charge.Vaughan Jones used reasonable force. What did he get for his trouble?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/vaughan-jones...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff