Icesave - is it in trouble ?

Author
Discussion

Gretchen

19,077 posts

218 months

Tuesday 8th April 2008
quotequote all
I blame Global Warming.


burnt

1,371 posts

251 months

Tuesday 8th April 2008
quotequote all
I think that as long as you stick to not having more than 35K in each account then you are covered by the fsa.

I'm an Icesave customer and heard the rumours (about Iceland, not Icesave specifically) but believe it all to be hype in these recession media hungry times.

limpsfield

5,896 posts

255 months

Tuesday 8th April 2008
quotequote all
Interestign discussion here:

http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?h=0...

you have the same cover as with a UK bank, but they are viewed as a higher risk and how long would it take you to get the cash back if the worst happened. It's this last bit that has put me off having an account with them although a couple of other good higher rate accounts at the moment are Bradford Bingley and Alliance & Leicester who are hardly safe as 'ouses.

bigandclever

13,851 posts

240 months

Tuesday 8th April 2008
quotequote all
As I understand it (and I have an accout with them) Icesave is a member of the financial services compensation scheme (FSCS) so you're covered up to £35k loss. However, there is a caveat that the first E20k (£15k ish??) is actually covered by the Icelandic compensation scheme, not the UK. So if it all went tits up then getting your £35k back would involve 2 regulators. If you think that a crunch is coming, and Iceland is going to get hit, and in particular Icelandic banks are going to get hit, then you might wobble a bit about gettin your first E20k back and so withdraw it. Interestingly, if the Icelandic government couldn't cover the compensation scheme then the other Nordic countries have a mechanism in place to step in and bail out one of their neighbours. So while the compensation schemes are theoretical, in that they've never been used, you could argue that there's nothing to say that this 'protection' is any better or worse than investing purely in UK banks.

Kaupthing is slightly different in that we (UK investors) use the UK banking arm of Kaupthing and so would be covered for the full £35k here on the UK compensation scheme.

Over £35k of course and you're not covered - like banks here.

Is it in trouble? Who the funk knows smile

paddyhasneeds

52,395 posts

212 months

Tuesday 8th April 2008
quotequote all
My only concern (and I do think it's more hypothetical than possible) is that with Icesave you don't have the full FSA scheme in place, you have to get the first £15k or so back through a "Passport" scheme which is administered by the banks home nation.

I have an account with Icesave, with the FSA limit in it and I'm planning on opening an account with someone like Northern Rock and transferring the bulk to that and then using the Icesave account for the overspill.

munky

5,328 posts

250 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
That's only because Kaupthing was the one that complained about the factual inaccuracy. Landsbanki (the bank behind Icesave) is quite safe. Well, safer than a fair number of UK banks anyway.

rich1231

17,331 posts

262 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
Got an email regarding a German Bank going Kaput today, cant remember the name of it.

Timmy33

12,915 posts

200 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
The only Icelandic thing I'd put my wedge in right now is Bjork personally speaking.

munky

5,328 posts

250 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
No, it was Weserbank, whoever they are. IKB seems to be on the mend

groucho

12,134 posts

248 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
I have an account with Icesave and am not particularly worried at the moment, it's all media scaremongering imo.

Thread running here

g4ry13

17,321 posts

257 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
I'm considering taking my money out of the account once I get this month's interest paid. The idea of having to wait for the icelandic authorities to clear it isn't too appealing. Ironically, I may put it with Northern Rock of all places rolleyes

Edited by g4ry13 on Thursday 10th April 00:11

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

56 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
So if you had a few hundred thousand that you want to keep safe for a year or two what would the wise man (or pistonheader) do?

groucho

12,134 posts

248 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
g4ry13 said:
I'm considering taking my money out of the account once I get this month's interest paid. The idea of having to wait to wait for the icelandic authorities to clear it isn't too appealing. Ironically, I may put it with Northern Rock of all places rolleyes
Panic withdrawing!

g4ry13

17,321 posts

257 months

Thursday 10th April 2008
quotequote all
groucho said:
g4ry13 said:
I'm considering taking my money out of the account once I get this month's interest paid. The idea of having to wait to wait for the icelandic authorities to clear it isn't too appealing. Ironically, I may put it with Northern Rock of all places rolleyes
Panic withdrawing!
Maybe, it's such a pain to set up a new account - this is my third savings account already is less than 2 years rolleyes

Even if the bank is fine, panic withdrawing can make the healthiest of banks have problems. I know it's somewhat different, but Northern Rock suffered from withdrawals on a large scale and ING has lost a lot lately from being so un-competitive. Icesave isn't so widely publicised so i'll keep it there for a bit and see how many inches it gets in the papers before making a decision.

groucho

12,134 posts

248 months

Thursday 10th April 2008
quotequote all
From their website...

Peace of mind

We are part of Landsbanki, one of the largest quoted financial services providers in Iceland. Here are a few key facts you might like to know about Landsbanki:

* We were founded in 1886 and have been operating in the UK since 2000
* We are a large and diversified financial services provider active in retail and corporate banking, investment banking, capital markets services, asset and wealth management for private banking customers and deposit taking in over 17 countries including the UK, Ireland, USA, France, Holland, Luxembourg and Hong Kong
* We had total worldwide assets of €33.4 billion that included assets exceeding £5 billion in the UK and liquid assets of €8.9 billion (as at 31 December 2007)
* We made a stable pre-tax profit for 2007 of €520 million
* We have a liquidity and capital position amongst the strongest of any bank in Northern Europe
* We have no direct or indirect exposure to the US sub-prime mortgage market or structured credit obligations like CDO’s, CLO’s and SIV’s
* We have strong credit ratings from the leading international ratings agencies - Moody's and Fitch

We also subscribe to the Banking Code and you can also rest assured that with Icesave you are offered the same level of financial protection as every bank in the UK. You can find our registered address and regulatory details here. All of this means that when you save with Icesave you can rest assured your savings are in a safe place.


So, they look pretty liquid to me. I wish all this financial jitters would stop.

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

244 months

Thursday 10th April 2008
quotequote all
munky said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
That's only because Kaupthing was the one that complained about the factual inaccuracy. Landsbanki (the bank behind Icesave) is quite safe. Well, safer than a fair number of UK banks anyway.
The market disagrees with you

Eric Mc

122,345 posts

267 months

Thursday 10th April 2008
quotequote all
They quote that their asset base is £33.4 billion worldwide and £5 billion in the UK.

That in itself is meaningless. What counts is the quality of those assets. Don't forget that all the borrowing it has lent out appears on their balance sheet as assets. If some of those assets turn out to be poor or bad debts, then the business could have problems looming.

As has been already said, Northern Rock (and many American banks) had high levels of "Assets" in their balance sheets. The fact that mauch of those assets had suddenly become valueless was not obvious until about six months ago.

Timmy33

12,915 posts

200 months

Thursday 10th April 2008
quotequote all
garyhun said:
So if you had a few hundred thousand that you want to keep safe for a year or two what would the wise man (or pistonheader) do?
Put it into index linked Goverment bonds.

munky

5,328 posts

250 months

Thursday 10th April 2008
quotequote all
NoelWatson said:
munky said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
That's only because Kaupthing was the one that complained about the factual inaccuracy. Landsbanki (the bank behind Icesave) is quite safe. Well, safer than a fair number of UK banks anyway.
The market disagrees with you
Yes it does. It also disagrees with all the ratings agencies and disgrees with the published financial accounts and disagrees with Richard Portes (London Business School & CEPR)
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&am...

Ask yourself what drives the market and who the players are and what their motives may be. There is definite evidence of market manipulation which the UK FSA (and the icelandic equiv) is looking into, including a certain US bank shorting shares and purposely failing to deliver.
Do you have blind faith that the market is right? When shares of LEH fell 35% in 2 days or HBOS 24% in 4 days or MF Global 65% in 1 day, was the market correct in the fundamental valuation of those businesses, or was it a reaction based on rumour and speculation?

briSk

14,291 posts

228 months

Thursday 10th April 2008
quotequote all
Confused.

Icesave is run as a subsiduary IN THE UK and I thought it WAS FSA regulated and therefore FCSC...???

even so i went LTSB because i don't trust the icelandics and their dodgy russian mafia money*.

  • he jests.